• Title/Summary/Keyword: fruit wall anatomy

Search Result 5, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

Fruit wall anatomy of the genus Krigia (Asteraceae, Lactuceae) and their taxonomic implications (Krigia속의 과피의 해부학적 구조와 분류학적 의미)

  • Lee, Bok Won;Park, Ji Kuk;Pak, Jae-Hong
    • Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy
    • /
    • v.34 no.4
    • /
    • pp.321-333
    • /
    • 2004
  • We researched fruit wall anatomical characters about the seven taxa of Krigia and the nearest one relative, Nothocalais cuspidata by making use of the fruit wall anatomy, and inferred systematical similarity. Among these characters, all species of the genus Krigia has identical characters in the shape of fruit and the number of rib, but showed specific differences in the shape of costa, the numbers of libriform fiber cell layers and fiber-sclereid cell layers in mesocarp, and development degree in these characters. Krigia biflora, K. cespitosa, K. occidentalis and K. wrightii have well developed libriform fiber cell, but K. dandelion, K. montana and K. virginica have undeveloped libriform fiber cell, and mostly consist of fiber-sclereid cell layers. According to the fruit wall anatomical characters, K. biflora which belonged to sect. Krigia in the previous classification system is more similar to sect. Cymbia than sect. Krigia.

Fruit Wall Anatomy of Ocotea (Lauraceae)

  • Heo, Kweon
    • Korean Journal of Plant Resources
    • /
    • v.9 no.3
    • /
    • pp.298-304
    • /
    • 1996
  • The fruit wall anatomy of Ocotea was investigated on the basis of 14 species within the genus to contribute to a better understanding of specific relationships and homogeneity of genus. The species have a similar mature fruit wall structure, but diUerences among the species are found with respect to whether or not sdc.nchyma cells are present in the mesocarp. if present, whether or not they are present in particular positions and forms. Comparisons with species studied suggested that at least a few groups of species can be distinguished in Ocotea. They arc divided into five groups on the basis of anatomical structures. i.e., group 1) O. atrriensis, O. cujumari, O. helicterifolia, O. rubra and O. schomburgkiana; group 2) O. aeiphylla, O. javitensis, and O. sp. [Werff et ai. 12676]; group 3) O. tonduzii: group 4) O. foetens, O. quixos, and O. veraguensis; and group 5) O. floribunda and O. nitida. These various variations in Ocntea were also discussed to invite its respective systematic revisions. By the comparisons with species, on the other hand, it suggested that the specialized species are evolved from non-specialized species.

  • PDF

Anatomy and Morphology of Two Hawaiian Endemic Portulaca Species

  • Kim, InSun
    • Applied Microscopy
    • /
    • v.44 no.2
    • /
    • pp.41-46
    • /
    • 2014
  • In this study, the vegetative and reproductive morphology and anatomy of two Hawaiian endemic Portulaca species were examined. Specifically, P. molokiniensis and P. sclerocarpa were compared to closely related species in the genus. The comparisons were both qualitative and quantitative, using characteristics of leaves, stems, roots, and fruits. Tissue organizations of vegetative and reproductive parts of the plants were assessed using microtechnique procedures, statistical analysis, and scanning electron microscopy. The most notable features of these two species were (1) the size and frequency of stomata in P. molokiniensis, and (2) the large number of sclerenchymatous cell layers in the thickest fruit walls of P. sclerocarpa. These findings may imply that stomata development in P. molokiniensis and thick fruit wall development in P. sclerocarpa are evolved features of survival. In particular, the development of thickened walls in indehiscent fruits likely has evolutionary implications of ecological tolerance for better adaptation.

Comparative study of fruit wall structure in Lapsana L. and Lapsanastrum J. H. Pak & K. Bremer (Asteraceae; Lactuceae) (개보리뺑이속과 서양개보리뺑이속(국화과; 상치족)의 과피벽 구조 비교 연구)

  • Pak, Jae-Hong;Choi, Kyung;Ito, Motorni
    • Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy
    • /
    • v.38 no.4
    • /
    • pp.359-369
    • /
    • 2008
  • The mature fruit wall structures were investigated in Lapsana communis, its six subspecies and the four species of Lapsanastrum (Asteraceae; Lactuceae). Lapsanastrum differs from Lapsana communis in some features: two or three protrudent costae verse equally developed costae, hairly versus glabrous exocarp, respectively. Moreover, Lapsana has no sclerenchymatous‐fiber cells in mesocarp, while Lapsanastrum has sclerenchymatous fiber cells. The differences in fruit wall structure between Lapsana and Lapsanastrum obviously support the separation of Lapsanastrum from Lapsana s. lat.

Taxonomic reconsideration of Lactuca hallaisanensis H. Lév. (한라고들빼기 (Lactuca hallaisanensis H. Lév.)의 분류학적 재고)

  • Pak, Jae-Hong;Kim, Young-Ok;Choi, Kyung
    • Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy
    • /
    • v.31 no.4
    • /
    • pp.311-319
    • /
    • 2001
  • In order to evaluate taxonomic status of Latcuca hallaisanensis H. $L{\acute{e}}v$., an endemic species of the Jeju-do Island, we investigated fruit wall structure and chromosome morphology. The fruit wall structure had 10-11 obtuse costae in the transverse section. The costa was wholly occupied by libriform fiber cells, and the underlying fibersclereid tissue was only one to three cells layers thick. Also, the intercosta lacked fiber-sclereid layers. Somatic chromosome numbers and karyotype of Latcuca hallaisanensis were recorded for the first time. This diploid species (2n=10) with the same basic number of x=5 has the total chromosome length $23.3{\mu}m$ and the length of each chromosome falls in $1.9{\mu}m-2.9{\mu}m$. It possess the karyotype complement i.e., 3sm+2st and a characteristic chromosome pair (No. 1 and 2) with a secondary constriction at the distal portion of the short arms. The overall similarity in external morphology (involucre, achene etc), chromosome morphology as well as in fruit wall anatomy between Lactuca hallaisanensis and Crepidiastrum s. lat. clearly indicated that this species should be treated as Crepidiastrum, rather than Lactuca.

  • PDF