• Title/Summary/Keyword: fisheye menu

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

Comparative Robustness and Efficiency of the Grid Menu (비교 연구를 통한 그리드 메뉴의 효율성 평가)

  • Cheng, Hong-In
    • Archives of design research
    • /
    • v.18 no.3 s.61
    • /
    • pp.191-198
    • /
    • 2005
  • Menu is the most common interaction tool to select and execute a specific menu item from multiple menu options. With the very rapid increasing amount of information, various new menu designs have been developed. In this research, the pull-down menu, fisheye menu and grid menu were tested to compare the performance time, error rate, simplicity, usefulness, user friendliness, and overall user preference of each menu type. The grid menu was more efficient in selection speed than the pull-down and fisheye menus when the number of menu-items was 50 and 100. The time needed to choose a menu-item with a grid menu was less affected by the size of menu. The pull-down and the grid menus were considered to be more satisfactory, simple, user friendly, and useful than the fisheye menu. 42.3 percent of subjects indicated that the grid menu was their preferred selection tool among the menus. The grid menu is an efficient and robust alternative menu choice for small and middle size menu list. Further study is required to examine the possibility of grid menu on mobile devices.

  • PDF

An Experimental Comparison on Visualization Techniques of Long Menu-Lists (긴 메뉴항목 리스트의 시각화 기법 비교에 관한 실험적 연구)

  • Seo, Eun-Gyoung;Sung, Hye-Eun
    • Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
    • /
    • v.24 no.2
    • /
    • pp.71-87
    • /
    • 2007
  • With the rapid change of the Web and E-transaction application, the search interface is providing more powerful search and visualization methods, while offering smoother integration of technology with task. Especially, visualization techniques for long menu-lists are applied in retrieval system with the goal of improving performance in user's ability to select one item from a long list. In order to review visualization techniques appropriate to the types of users and data set, this study compared the five visualization browsers such as the Tree-structured menu, the Table-of-contents menu, the Roll-over menu, the Click menu, and Fisheye menu. The result of general analyses shows that among the hierarchical methods, the experienced group prefers the Table-of-contents method menu, whereas the novice's group prefers the Tree-structure method menu. Among the linear methods, the two groups prefer the Roll-over menu. The Roll-over menu is most preferred among the five browsers by the two groups.