• 제목/요약/키워드: fashion politics

검색결과 53건 처리시간 0.024초

1920년대 가르손느의 출현과 그 복식 (The Emergence of $Gar\c{c}onne$ and it's Costume in 1920's)

  • 조규화
    • 한국의류학회지
    • /
    • 제8권3호
    • /
    • pp.19-30
    • /
    • 1984
  • There is a symbolic term which has realized custom of an era and has eome into fashion since the middle of 1920's. That is Garconne. This paper studied the image and costume of Garconne expressed in literary works, the form of art made it to come into being, and costume of a group of women played a role of pioneers of Garconne. Garconne attempted simple, casual, and mannish costume instead of usual elegance. It was the boiysh style($\`{a}$, la Garconne) which did not stress on the bust and waist like chanel suits used wool jersey by a designer, Chanel ana short skirts of low waist line. They got short haircut and wore low heel shoes. Garconne meant women who were free of convention, were familiar with love a d profession, and lived for themselves in the same manner of young men. They yieled new mode of 1920's. Though their lives were only a period, they manifested the symbol of the period though their figure and designation was not disappeared at the age but was settled as a mark of fixed image. There were several reasons why the Garconne was born. Rapid changes in politics, economics, and society in Europe were occurred from the First World War to 1920 and the trend of custom and art was a turning point. Especially, the entry of women into the society and the mode of Art Deco influenced it directly. The role of a pioneer of Garconne was appeared from the French Revolution. As Merveilleuse, Lionne, and Bloomers wore peculiar clothings ana had life style being irrelevant to tradition, they were talked about. They informed in advance the appearance of new women who were different from romantic ladies and were more modern and active. The pioneer design of Paul Poiret which were over whelming throughout a period and functional design of Chanel were increasingly accelerated.

  • PDF

Shoes from Pinet to the Present

  • June, Swann
    • 한국복식학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국복식학회 2001년도 19th International Costume Association Congress
    • /
    • pp.11-13
    • /
    • 2001
  • For those unfamiliar with the shoe world, Pinet (1817-1897) was a contemporary of Worth, the great Parisian couturier. So I look at the glamour shoes and the world of haute couture, and indeed the development of the named designer. That is a concept we are all familiar with now. So it is not easy to comprehend the lack of names for the exquisite work before 1850. Straightway I have to say that the number of noted shoe designers is far fewer than famous dress designers, but I will introduce you to some of them, against the background of contemporary shoe fashions. Franc;ois Pinet was born in the provinces (probably Touraine) in 1817, two years after the end of the Napoleonic Wars. His father, an ex-soldier, settled to shoemaking, a comparatively clean and quiet trade. It had a tradition of literacy, interest in politics, and was known as the gentle craft, which attracted intelligent people. We should presume father would be helped by the family. It was usual for a child to begin by the age of 5-6, tying knots, sweeping up, running errands and gradually learning the job. His mother died 1827, and father 1830 when he was 13, and at the time when exports of French shoes were flooding world markets. He went to live with a master shoemaker, was not well treated, and three years later set out on the tour-de- France. He worked with masters in Tours and Nantes, where he was received as Compagnon Cordonnier Bottier du Devoir as Tourangeau-Ia rose dAmour (a name to prove most appropriate). He went on to Bordeaux, where at 19 he became president of the local branch. In 1841 he went to Paris, and in 1848, revolution year, as delegate for his corporation, he managed to persuade them not to go on strike. By now the shoemakers either ran or worked for huge warehouses, and boots had replaced shoes as the main fashion. In 1855 Pinet at the age of 38 set up his own factory, as the first machines (for sewing just the uppers) were appearing. In 1863 he moved to new ateliers and shop at Rue ParadisPoissoniere 44, employing 120 people on the premises and 700 outworkers. The English Womans Domestic Magazine in 1867 records changes in the boots: the soles are now wider, so that it is no longer necessary to walk on the uppers. There is interest in eastern Europe, the Polonaise boots with rosette of cord and tassels and Bottines Hongroises withtwo rows of buttons, much ornamented. It comments on short dresses, and recommends that the chaussure should correspond to the rest of the toilet. This could already be seen in Pinets boots: tassels and superb flower embroidery on the higher bootleg, which he showed in the Paris Exposition that year. I think his more slender and elegant Pinet heel was also patented then or 1868. I found little evidence for colour-matching: an English fashion plate of 1860 shows emerald green boots with a violetcoloured dress.

  • PDF

강남 개발과 강남적 도시성의 형성 - 반공 권위주의 발전국가의 공간선택성을 중심으로 - (The Development of Gangnam and the Formation of Gangnam-style Urbanism : On the Spatial Selectivity of the Anti-Communist Authoritarian Developmental State)

  • 지주형
    • 한국지역지리학회지
    • /
    • 제22권2호
    • /
    • pp.307-330
    • /
    • 2016
  • 이 논문은 한국의 압축도시화의 한 사례이자 표준으로서 서울의 강남이 어떻게 형성되었는지 설명하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 강남 및 강남 스타일의 도시화는 유례를 찾아 볼 수 없을 정도로 급속한 도시화가 진행되었다는 점에서, 그 이전의 한국의 도시화 양상 및 서구의 도시와 구별된다는 점에서, 그리고 현대 한국의 삶에 정치, 경제, 문화적으로 매우 중요한 하나의 모델을 제공한다는 점에서 연구의 가치가 매우 크다. 하지만 그럼에도 강남의 독특한 도시성(urbanism)이 어떠한 사회적 조건에서 어떻게 형성되었는지에 대한 연구는 그리 많지 않은 편이다. 이 글에서는 먼저 선망이 되는 물질적 풍경이자 생활양식으로서의 강남적 도시성의 특징을 서술한다. 강남적 도시성은 물질적 공간의 측면에서 중상층이 주거와 자산증식을 위해 소유하는 고급 고층 아파트 단지를 특징으로 하고, 사회문화적 생활양식의 측면에서 정치적 보수성, 사적몰입과 공적 무관심, 학력, 외모, 패션 등에서의 경쟁, 유흥문화 등을 특징으로 한다. 이러한 강남적 도시성의 원형은 한국 반공 권위주의 발전국가 전략의 공간선택성 속에서 매우 짧은 시간에 압축적으로 형성되었다. 즉 그것은 북한과 대치상황 및 서울로의 인구집중 속에서 강북개발과 영등포개발을 억제하고 강남개발과 아파트를 통해 인구를 급히 분산하고 수용해야 했던 반공주의 국가의 필요성, 서민과 도시빈민을 도시개발에서 공간적으로 배제하는 권위주의 국가의 특성, 그리고 예외공간과 가격왜곡을 통해 건설자본과 중산층에 특혜를 부여하고 강남의 아파트 건설과 불균등 발전을 촉진한 발전국가의 선별적 주택산업정책이 결합되어 만들어낸 공간 선택성에 의해 상당 부분 설명될 수 있다.

  • PDF