• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.142-151
• /
• 2009

이 연구는 과학 교육과정 중 천문관련 단원의 내용과 천문과학관의 전시내용을 비교 분석하여 천문과학관이 교육과정의 내용과 목표를 얼마나 잘 반영하고 있는지 알아보는데 목적이 있다. 연구 대상은 국내 천문과학관 5곳으로 천문과학관 프로그램 평가도구를 사용하여 프로그램 내용을 평가하고 프로그램 형태를 조사하여 분석하였다. 이 때 사용된 평가도구는 교육부(1997)에서 고시한 과학교육과정 내용과 교육과정평가원(2000)에서 제시한 성취기준 및 평가기준을 근거로 고안하였다. 이 연구의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 천문과학관에서는 과학 교육과정 내용 중 천문관련 학습요소를 대부분 반영하고 있었다. 이는 천문과학관이 비형식 교육 기관으로서 학교 과학 교육과 비교적 잘 연계되고 있음을 보여준다. 교육과정 반영 비율은 5학년이 가장 높으며, 전시 형태는 패널 형태가 가장 많았다. 평가점수는 반영비율에 비하여 낮았는데 이는 향후 천문과학관의 프로그램을 선정함에 있어 과학 교육과정을 더 충실히 반영하여야 함을 알 수 있다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.303-309
• /
• 1995

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of STS Programs on science-related attitude of junior high school students. For this study, samples of 198 students who are in grade 8 were selected. The eight STS Programs were used in this study. One group pretest-posttest design was used in this study as an experimental design. The TOSRA was used in this study as the science-related attitude evaluation instrument. The major results of this study are as followings: 1. The effects of STS programs about the junior high school students' science-related attitude indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between pretest and posttest. 2. Total students were classified as high(above about mean) or low (bellow about mean) on the basis of science-related attitude pretest scores. The low level students have improved from using of STS programs in teaching science on science-related attitude scores. The high level students have dropped from using of STS programs in teaching science on science-related attitude scores.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2009

This study was to analyze the effect of 'mobile science-lab' through the survey of students' perception. 'Mobile science-lab' is the one of the most distinguished public science programs and has been made in order to promote the students' understanding of science by providing students an opportunity to be engaged in several activities of science and high-technology. To fulfill the purpose of this study, we analyzed the opinions of 3,643 students who participated in 'mobile science-lab'. As the results, 'mobile science-lab' is very effective on improving the students' interest and concern of science. Most students recognized that the best advantage of 'mobile science-lab' is the participation in experiments. To overcome the mobile science-lab's some limits, more researches including development of the training program of science show coordinators should be done.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.62-79
• /
• 2009

In the present study I developed the test for earth scientific creativity level and verified means to measure scientific creativity. I developed 22 test items and after being examined by science education specialist, 11 items were finally established, and these were applied to 104 middle students. Each answer paper was graded according to the standard answer that I developed and the results of analysis are as follows. First, to verify the validity of measuring means I figured out content validity. The content validity about test items and adequacy of evaluation goal was examined by 1 science education specialist and 3 middle school science teachers, 6 education graduate students. As a result of validity verification, the content validity was 82.7% and it showed that the test of earth scientific creativity was valid for evaluation goal and sub-factors of creativity. Second, to verify reliability of measuring means, I analyzed internal consistency of the test sheet of earth scientific creativity after finding correlation coefficient and Cronbach's $\alpha$. Cronbach's $\alpha$, the internal reliability coefficient, was 0.848. Therefore, it was verified that this test sheet of earth scientific creativity is reliable to measure the creativity of the middle school students. The correlation between sub-factors of creativity was statistically significant, and for the relation between the variables related to creativity, the originality was the most significant. This shows that in the procedure of scientific creativity and studying science, originality should be the most important factor.

• Asian Journal of Business Environment
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.31-36
• /
• 2017

Purpose - The purpose of the study was to develop a reliable measurement tool for the evaluation of TQM application in Greek education settings and to examine the factors that determine quality of education. Research design, data, and methodology - A questionnaire commencing from the questions included in the Application Guide of Common Assessment Framework was used for research purposes. Each item was scored on a 5point Likert scale - to a sample of 112 educators (55 men, 57 women), all teachers working in public primary education schools. Factor analysis resulted in a questionnaire of 43 items consisting of five factors, teacher satisfaction, school management and operation, motivation, effectiveness of public school leadership and finance management. Results - Results revealed a positive correlation among all factors. Reliability results using Cronbach's α was high (a=.961) for all factors of the questionnaire ranging from α=.930 (for motivation) to α=.797 (for financial management). Additionally, ICC procedure revealed high values for the above mentioned factors. Conclusions - The study resulted in the construction of a reliable questionnaire focused exclusively on TQM that can be used in future studies using larger samples in different areas so as to draw useful conclusions regarding TQM application in Greek education settings and further identify the factors determining quality in education.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.367-375
• /
• 2005

본 연구에서는 문헌 연구, 설문 조사, 수업관찰 및 교사 면담 등을 통하여 수업평가 기준의 목적, 개발이 필요한 이유, 수업평가 기준의 역할 등을 살펴보았다. 이어서 현장 교사들이 생각하는 수업평가 기준 개발의 바람직한 주체가 누구이며, 수업평가 기준이 개발될 경우 누가 가장 많은 혜택을 받을 것으로 기대하는지를 살펴보고, 나아가 수업평가(기준) 정착을 위한 선결 요건을 고찰하였다. 요약하면, 수업 평가기준은 (1) 초보자를 위한 지침, (2) 숙련된 전문가를 위한 지침서 (3) 개선 노력을 집중할 부분을 파악하는 구조, (4) 교직이외의 다른 공동체들과의 의사소통의 수단이 될 수 있다. 또한, 수업평가는 물론 수업평가 기준 개발의 주체는 교사들이어야 하며, 일반 기준과 차별화 되는 교과별 기준, 즉 과학과 수업평가 기준 개발의 필요성을 논의하였다. 즉, 교과별 수업평가 기준 개발은 교사들의 적극적인 참여와 교육과 관련된 주요 이해당사자들이 폭넓게 참가하지 않고서는 성공하기 어렵다. 이러한 수업 평가기준 개발의 성공 여부는 이러한 평가기준이 일반 공동체, 특히 교육 공동체에 의해 수용되는 수준에 따라 결정될 것이다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제50권2호
• /
• pp.169-189
• /
• 2019

이 연구는 학교도서관 운영평가 지표의 우선순위를 도출하여 현장성이 반영된 평가지표의 개선방안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 학교도서관의 대표적인 전담인력인 사서교사를 대상으로 Analytic Hierarchy Progress(AHP) 분석방법을 적용하여 평가지표의 우선순위를 분석하였다. 연구결과, 상위 계층 평가영역의 우선순위는 인적자원, 도서관서비스, 정보자원, 도서관경영, 시설 환경 순으로 나타났고, 하위 계층 평가항목의 우선순위는 인력자원배치, 인력자원 전문성, 독서교육, 정보활용교육, 교육활성화 노력, 장서 구성 적설성, 장서 최신성, 예산, 시설 접근성, 장서 현황, 시설 설비 적절성, 경영계획, 이용 접근성, 홍보 및 마케팅, 학교도서관운영위원회, 협력, 자료이용현황 순으로 나타났다. 본 연구를 통해 도출한 결론은 현장성이 가미된 학교도서관 평가지표를 적용함에 있어서 기초자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.179-186
• /
• 2023

Background: This study summarizes the experience of operating a 'Medical Humanities' course, which was taught remotely to maintain activities and discussions at medical schools in Daegu, Korea during the sudden and unexpected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: The subjects of this study were 73 first- and 79 second-grade medical students who took the medical humanities (1) and (2) courses among first- and second-grade students of Yeungnam University College of Medicine in 2020. Of the 152 students who agreed to the online survey, 123 completed the survey. Self-, environmental, and program evaluations were conducted on the study subjects, and differences according to grade and gender were analyzed. Results: As a result of the study, a significant difference between self-evaluation and environmental evaluation was confirmed. Self-evaluation was determined to be higher in the first grade than in the second grade. The environmental evaluation showed that male students were more satisfied than female students and students generally had difficulties in the classroom environment. Of the applications used in class, the highest satisfaction was observed with KakaoTalk (Kakao Corp.) and Zoom (Zoom Video Communications Inc.). At the end of COVID-19, the students preferred online classes. Conclusion: If the learning environment for online classes is well prepared and systematic provisions are made, such as class operations that are suitable for the subject, effective education and learning can be achieved by taking advantage of both face-to-face and online classes.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.53-63
• /
• 1999

This research surveyed how much the professors ill tile university of education and primary school teachers understand the 6th National primary science Curriculum. Items to check tile degree of purpose description, reflection of basic policy, appropriateness of content, its organization, teaching method and evaluation, its influence on textbook and putting in practice of themselves were evaluated neutral or positive by most of them. But the opinion of responders were divided into tile two extremes, positive or negative, ell tile possibility of carrying out various inquiry activities and participation in science activities of students. Both of professors and teachers indicated that tile explanatory book of curriculum and annotated teachers' edition are the principal sources of information about curriculum. And the teachers stated that the shortage of information and materials are the principal factors to obstruct the change of lessons according to new curriculum.

• 대한한의학회지
• /
• 제45권1호
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2024

Introduction: The importance of clinical skills training in traditional Korean medicine education is increasingly emphasized. Since the clinical skills tests are high-stakes tests that determine success in national licensing exams, it is essential to develop reliable multifaceted analysis methods for clinical skills tests in actual education settings. In this study, we applied the multifaceted validity evaluation methods to the evaluation results of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation module to confirm the applicability and effectiveness of the methods. Methods: In this study, we used internal consistency, factor analysis, generalizability theory G-study and D-study, ANOVA, Kendall's tau, descriptive statistics, and other statistical methods to analyze the multidimensional validity of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation test in clinical education settings over the past three years. Results: The factor analysis and internal consistency analysis showed that the evaluation rubric had an unstable structure and low concordance. The G-study showed that the error of the clinical skills assessment was large due to the evaluator and unexpected errors. The D-study showed that the variance error of the evaluator should be significantly reduced to validate the evaluation. The ANOVA and Kendall's tau confirmed that evaluator heterogeneity was a problem. Discussion and Conclusion: Clinical skills tests should be continuously evaluated and managed for validity in two steps of pre-production and actual implementation. This study has presented specific methods for analyzing the validity of clinical skills training and testing in actual education settings. This study would contribute to the foundation for competency-based evidence-based education in practical clinical training.