• 스마트미디어저널
• /
• 제12권5호
• /
• pp.102-110
• /
• 2023

공학교육인증 정기평가에서 프로그램 교육목표의 경우 부족사항이 거의 없어야 하지만, 많이 발생하고 있다. 2021년 정기평가부터는 두 번째 부족사항에 대하여 조건부 인증으로 판정하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 공학교육인증제 운영과 인증평가를 준비하면서 교육목표 설정에 대하여 프로그램 차원의 이해도가 상대적으로 낮은 사회 환경변화를 고려한 프로그램 교육목표(이하 교육목표) 적절성 검토체계의 적용 사례를 제시한다. 또한, 교육목표 개정 및 개선 과정에서의 세부인증기준 간의 연계 적용 방안 등에 대하여 인증기준, 공학교육인증평가 판정가이드 및 자체평가보고서 양식을 중심으로 적용 사례를 제시한다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.24-32
• /
• 2008

한국의 공과대학의 교육 목표는 1) 전공교육의 강화, 2) 팀워크능력, 커뮤니케이션 스킬, 비판적 사고력 등을 포함하는 공과대학 소양의 함양 두 가지로 요약될 수 있다. 이 두 가지 교육 목표를 달성하기 위한 시도로 제안된 것이 공학소양교육이다. 현재 공과대학의 교양교육 개선안에는 전공에 구애받지 않는 보편적 교양교육을 강조하고 있는 미국형과 일반 교양교육과 구분되는 공학소양교육의 필요성을 강조하는 한국공학교육인증원형으로 구분된다. 본 연구는 한국공학교육인증원의 공학소양교육과정을 교육과정 개편에 적용한 서울대학교 공과대학의 교양 교육과정 개편 내용과 그 의미를 탐색하였다. 이 논문에 제시된 서울대학교 공과대학 교양교육 개선안은 교양교육의 학점 중 학생들의 자유선택 과목의 비중을 줄이고, 공학소양교육으로 이수하게 하는 방안을 포함하고 있다. 이 방안은 전공에 구애받지 않는 공통적 교양교육의 틀을 지키면서 전공과 단과대학의 특성을 반영하는 전공소양형 교양교육을 강조하는 현실적 방안으로 평가될 수 있다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.57-63
• /
• 2009

학습성과 평가체계 수립 과정은 일반적으로 다음과 같다. 먼저 각 학습성과의 수행수준에 따른 수행 준거를 설정하고, 교육과정을 통하여 달성되어야 하는 프로그램 학습성과의 달성목표를 수립한 이후에 적절한 평가 도구를 가지고 루브릭에 기초하여 측정 평가를 실행한다. 측정된 결과를 토대로 분석평가한 이후에 프로그램 학습성과 달성을 위해 교육과정 개선을 도모한다. 그리고 나서 적용된 프로그램 개선 사항은 다양한 경로를 통하여 공개된다. 특히 본 논문에서는 광운대학교 전기공학 프로그램의 평가체계 및 적용 사례를 통하여 공학교육인증 대상 학생과 그렇지 않은 학생의 학습성과를 비교 분석해 보았다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.18-33
• /
• 2010

This paper describes two capstone senior design courses for the Mechanical Engineering program at University of the Pacific. The first course taught in the Fall semester is entitled "Engineering Design/Senior Project I." The second course taught in the Spring semester is entitled "Engineering Design/Senior Project II." All Mechanical Engineering students with senior standing are required to take these two classes in this sequence. At the end of every Spring semester, industrial advisors are invited to assess the final senior projects during an annual Senior Project Day. This assessment is performed using the Program Outcomes and Program Educational Objectives established for Pacific's Mechanical Engineering program. Since all Mechanical Engineering students are required to complete senior projects, this is a 100% evaluation process. After the evaluations are done, the data sets are compiled and reviewed by the faculty for assessment purposes. It is important to note that the industrial advisors perform the evaluations, but the faculty members assess the information to determine if modifications need to be made to the program or courses. In addition to the senior project evaluations, general feedback from Mechanical Engineering Industrial Advisory Committee (MEIAC) members is also useful for the outcomes-based assessment process in addition to the definition and evaluation of Program Outcomes and Program Educational Objectives.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제19권5호
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 2016

This paper aims to apply two ways of student evaluation, i.e. peer- and self-evaluation to TBL(team based learning) class and to explore the difference between two evaluations by gender and grade as well as their relationships, and finally to provide an explanation for the improvement of evaluation ways in TBL class. There has been much research about TBL and its related factors. However, according to the examination of both domestic and overseas researches concerning the application of peer- and self-evaluation to TBL class, few studies have focused on them in terms of the engineering curriculum. This study was conducted with 251 engineering students at P University, and peer- and self-evaluation in TBL class have been measured. Our findings show that firstly, there were significant grade differences in self-evaluation of engineering students. Second, there were no significant gender and grade differences in peer-evaluation. Third, we found a significant correlation between the two factors, self- and peer-evaluation. Also there was a significant correlation among variables of subcategories. Based on these findings, it is expected to provide an explanation for the application of peer- and self-evaluation in TBL class and will be useful for the improvement plans of the related courses in engineering school.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.51-58
• /
• 2014

The main objective of this research lies in estimating how much importance the educators of professional general education and MSC curriculum put on assessment, and, thereafter, take what support should be provided for the efficient assessment of education. The subjects of this research are educators of professional general education and MSC curriculum in the engineering education enrichment program at the 58 universities out of 72 universities where the accreditation for engineering education is implemented. Accordingly questionnaires were distributed to a total of 58 universities among which 136 questionnaires were collected. The data analysis methods, mean and response sample T test, were used in this research. The following conclusions were drawn from the results of this research. First, tile mean of importance and performance in the 'assessment activities' were relatively high. However, in tile assessment, the assessment performance was relatively lower than the assessment importance. Second, the results of the Importance-Performance Matrix in the 'assessment activities' was analyzed by two ways. First, Analyzed with the scale mean, The result means that Keep up the Good Work (KGW) sector included all factors. Second, Analyzed with the actual mean, The result means that KGW sector included 5 factors A, J, B, D, C. Possible Overkill(PO) sector included factors C, I. Low Priority(LP) sector included 4 factors K, E, H, L. Concentrate Here (CH) sector included factor G.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제19권5호
• /
• pp.35-47
• /
• 2016

This study analyzed outcomes of CAC(Computing Accreditation Committee) program individually applied in the field of computing engineering since 2007, and draw improvements. Literature review through academic journals, survey research and the FGI(Focus Group Interview) were used to accomplish objectives of the study. In addition, the survey research and FGI were done for professors. For the survey research, nationally 20 out of 44 universities which operates the CAC program were investigated, and sample universities were considered by region. FGI was done to analyze the performance and problems of CAC in more detail for 6 experts. Results of the study were follows as; first, CAC program was activated through the Seoul Accord activation support business by government. Second, BSM(Basic Science and Math), engineering major and engineering design education have been strengthened compared with before and after of CAC introduction in the computing engineering field. Third, soft skills needed for students in the college of engineering have been organized in the professional general curriculum, and professors aware of improvement of ability of the students for the skills. The degree of satisfaction for the CAC program has been examined as normal level, but improvement of educational system and the overall quality enhancement of computing engineering education were affected by CAC program. Nonetheless of positive results of CAC program, incentive system for certification program graduates, the expansion of the autonomy of the department, reduction in the amount of self-evaluation report, and support of administrative human resources were suggested for taking root successfully of CAC program.

• 한국실천공학교육학회논문지
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.40-46
• /
• 2011

공학교육인증시스템에서 프로그램 교육목표란 졸업생이 졸업 후 3~4년 후에 달성하어야 할 목표로 정의를 하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 한국기술교육대학교 정보통신정공에서 설정하고 있는 교육목표가 산업 현장에서 얼마나 중요하며 어느 정도 달성되었는지를 평가하기위한 평가도구로 간접평가 방법에 의한 설문문항을 개발하고 제시한다. 제안된 설문문항을 사용하여 졸업생 및 산업체 고용주들을 대상으로 설문조사를 통하여 교육목표 중요도 및 달성도를 평가하여 보았다. 조사결과 글로벌역량과 관련된 부분이 부족한 것으로 나타나고 있으며 이를 개선하기 위한 다양한 교육과정 개선이 필요하다고 판단된다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.42-55
• /
• 2003

이 연구는 환경분야 이공계 대학의 교육과정 실태를 분석하고, 환경분야 이공계 대학의 교육과정 개선 방안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이에 따라 환경분야 이공계 대학의 교육과정을 분석 제시하고자 각 대학의 교과목을 분석하였으며, 그에 따른 문제점과 시사점을 도출하였다. 또한 환경분야 이공계 대학의 교육과정 개선 방안으로 환경분야 산업체 전문가들이 참여한 가운데 직무분석 작업 실시, 산업현장에서 요구하는 교육과정 신설, 산업체 연수프로그램 등을 제시하여 환경교육과정이 현장위주로 개선되어야 함을 제시하였다. 연구 방법으로는 관련 자료의 수집 및 분석, 환경관련 학과의 교육과정 실태분석, 환경관련 교수전공 실태 등을 인터넷, 자료 및 문헌조사를 통해 실시하였다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.68-76
• /
• 2002

It is proposed to raise the debate on Engineering and Technical Education at the global economic level and to examine some of the issues facing developing and poorer countries in managing and improving the quality of engineering education in their countries, especially in the context of internet and IT culture After the fall of the Berlin Wall, the world is now divided in two realigned blocks: one of developed(rich or advanced) countries which have a social security safety net for their population and another of developing(or poor) countries which have no such luxuries for their population. For the general public in the developing countries, any engineering or technical degree/diploma is a passport to lifelong wellbeing of an individual and his/her extended family. Therefore, the demand for such qualifications is very high and it is almost a rat race amongst school leavers to get into engineering/technical colleges. In view of this booming demand, there are hundreds of privately funded engineering/technical colleges in countries like Philippines, India, Thailand, etc., besides state funded ones. It is extremely difficult to ensure good quality in this mushrooming scenario. There are also many very small poorly resourced developing countries where there is only one engineering school and/or two-three technical colleges. Products of these schools/colleges work only in their own country and education globalization have little or no meaning for them. Besides highlighting the aforementioned general issues, the Paper also presents a few case studies on problems of accreditation and quality assessment in larger developing countries like India and the Philippines. The Paper also discusses the effects of commercialization on the quality of education and social impacts of IT revolution on educational processes.