• Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.59-69
• /
• 2013

The Consultation about Energy Use Plan is prescribed by the Energy Use Rationalization Act. In order to reset Examination Criteria for Energy Use Plan, consultation case analysis from 2001 to 2010 were carried out and National Energy Master Plan was reviewed. This study proposes that Examination Criteria for Energy Use Plan be should divided into Urban & Tourism complex development project and Industrial complex development project for the prevention of civil complain. Also predicts that effect of energy savings calculated by Reset Examination Criteria on $1^{ST}$ energy demand BAU at 2030 is 2.2%, effect of new & renewable energy utilization at 2030 is 3% and the rate of $CO_2$ reduction to greenhouse gas emission BAU at 2020 is 1.1%.

• Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society
• /
• v.34 no.4
• /
• pp.101-109
• /
• 2014

The Consultation about Energy Use Plan is prescribed by the Energy Use Rationalization Act. This study calculated the Standard Data for Energy Use Plan of Industry Complex by the 9th Korean Standard Industrial Classification Divisions so that the energy demand reflecting the industrial technology change and characteristics of Manufacturing Divisions would predict. To achieve this aim, analysis on thousands of data in Energy Consumption Report Forms reported from industries which annual consumption of energy exceeds 2,000toe from 2009 to 2010 was carried out. The results showed that calculated overall mean fuel basic unit decrease, electricity basic unit increase and energy basic unit increase compared to that of the Notification No. 2002-130 of the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy, therefore it means that heat source of energy facilities transferred from fuel to electricity. Also resultingly suggests that the related notification, code etc. are amended as soon as possible.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.18-26
• /
• 2022

The Korean government is conducting heat-using equipment(industrial boiler) inspection in accordance with the Energy Use Rationalization Act because of the heat-using equipment(industrial boiler)'s risks such as explosion and fire, and safe use and management. This paper aimed to setup the safe and performance vulnerabilities from database based on the inspection results for heat-using equipment(industrial boiler). This study surveyed the inspection results of 1,249 heat-using equipment(industrial boiler) which were failed inspection of heat-using equipment(industrial boiler) from january 2016 to december 2020. And the analysis method is to inform safety and performance vulnerability categories of heat-using equipment(industrial boiler) by statistically analyzing the failure reasons of boiler type and inspection type which are high variance in failure rate. The safety and performance vulnerability categories was abbreviated into 18 cases. And each catagory's main reason for failure was suggested by additional analyzing the opinions of inspectors. This paper would be the basic source and the comprehensive information dealing with the safety and performance vulnerability of heat-using equipment(industrial boiler).

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2019

Large-scale industrial boilers operating at high temperature and high pressure, have a large amount of water, and a large amount of energy is released at the time of explosion. Currently, most industrial boilers use gas fuel such as LNG and LPG, etc. and fuel exists in the same space as equipment, so there is a high possibility of secondary damage such as fire or explosion in the event of a boiler accident. Both special care and management are required to operate the very dangerous equipment that causes casualty 2.51 per accident. For boilers of a certain size or more, the Korea Energy Agency conducts inspections in accordance with the Energy Usage Rationalization Act, KS, and public notice of the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Resources. In this research, based on the results of the inspection, the hazard factorss are configured, and a questionnaire is conducted to the inspector, the equipment manager, the maintenance person, and the person in charge of the manufacturer. We analyzed the results by using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). As a result of analysis, generally recognized hazard factorss are not good management, measurement failure, specification failure, water leak, leak analysis, but connection, welding, scale, and corrosion, etc. are relatively less important. It is judged that the adverse factors that are recognized to be highly important among all groups and careers are already well managed, but less important and adverse factors should be well managed to ensure that the safe usage of the boiler.