• 한국언어정보학회지:언어와정보
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.1-26
• /
• 2004

This paper investigates the nature of the discourse domain involved with focus sentences. The major theories of focus including Roothian Alternative Semantics are critically reviewed: Alternative Semantics takes a contradictory attitude toward the truth conditional aspect of free focus. The truth conditional differences are treated as a pragmatic inference, while they are captured by the semantic mechanism, that is, the alternative sets generated by focus constructions. In addition, the alternative sets are ad hoc since they are generated only for focus constructions. This paper attempts to show that the alternative sets introduced by foci in the framework of Alternative Semantics are neither necessary nor sufficient for an analysis of focus. It is argued that the domain sets simply provided by the model itself suffices for a proper analysis of focus constructions.

• 한국어교육
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.181-219
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to review the functions of {됐어} and {X了} as a discourse marker on different levels, and to examine their similarities and differences. {됐어} has not been widely recognized as a discourse marker in the field of Korean linguistics and Korean language education. Therefore, in order to establish the identity of {됐어} as a discourse marker, the reasons that {됐어} can be regarded as discourse marker were explained prior to the contrastive analysis. As to the method of contrastive analysis for {됐어} and {X了}, they were analyzed on three main dimensions: that is, the textual dimension, the interpersonal dimension, and the metalinguistic dimension in the corpus consisting of scripts of Korean and Chinese sitcoms. The results are as follows. In the textual domain, {됐어} and {X了} have the function of closing the topic in common, while {X了} can indicate a new topic and transmit a topic. In terms of functions in the interpersonal domain, {됐어} and {X了} are commonly used to refuse a partner's proposal or request and to interrupt a partner's speech or action. Furthermore, in the interactional aspect, {됐어} and {X了} performs the function of expressing a response to a preceding utterance and taking the turn of speaking. The difference between them in the interpersonal domain is that {X了} performs the function of correcting a speaker's utterance. In the metalinguistic domain, {됐어} and {X了} are common in that they perform the function of expressing the dissatisfaction of the speaker, showing generosity and making a compromise with the addressee. {X了}'s distinguishing characteristics in this domain is that it can express the attitude of consoling the hearer.

• Journal of Electrical Engineering and information Science
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 1996

This paper presents a text-driven discourse analysis system, called DPAS. DPAS constructs a discourse structure by weaving together clauses in the text by finding discourse relations between a clause and the clauses in a context. The basic processing model of DPAS is based on the stack based model of discourse analysis suggested by Grosz and Sidner. We extend the model with dynamic programming method to handle various discourse ambiguities effectively and efficiently. We develop the idea of a context space to keep all information of a context. DPAS parses a text by considering all possible discourse relations between a clause and a context. Since different discourse relations may result in different states of a context, DPAS maintains multiple context spaces for an ambiguous text. Since maintaining all interpretations until the whole text is processed requires too much computing resources, DPAS uses the idea of depth-limited search to limit the search space. If there is more than one discourse relation between an input clause and a context, DPAS constructs context spaces one context space for each discourse relation. Then, DPAS applies heuristics to choose the most desirable context space after it processes some more input clauses. Since the basic idea of DPAS is domain independent, although we used descriptive texts to demonstrate DPAS, we believe the idea of DPAS can be extended to understand other styles of texts.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제47권3호
• /
• pp.544-559
• /
• 2023

Social discourses surrounding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DE&I) in the fashion industry are vital as they extend beyond language and encompass social practices. This study aimed to understand how discourses on DE&I with in the fashion industry are reconstructed and practiced in society. Therefore, this paper analyzed DE&I in the fashion industry, by focusing on the New York Times articles, employing a quantitative research model based on corpus analysis and a qualitative approach through critical discourse analysis. Results of the analysis of textual practice, showed that the New York Times emphasized black individuals as the central discourse and created a critical racial narrative regarding DE&I in the fashion industry characterized by a dichotomy of black vs. white confrontation. Furthermore, results of the discourse practice analysis revealed that the dichotomy of racial confrontation in the New York Times article tended to select the subject of discourse related to racial DE&I in the fashion industry according based on social and historical context. Thirdly, the analytical results of sociocultural practices indicated that the dichotomous racial discourse between black and white, propagated by the New York Times, spread across social media, transforming fashion from an industry to a domain where black individuals struggle for human rights.

• 한국언어정보학회지:언어와정보
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.67-82
• /
• 2000

The purpose of the paper is twofold. First, we revise the well-known Centering Theory of anaphora resolution and propose the controlled Information Packaging Theory (for short, CIPT). Second, we suggest a solution to the resolution of the antecedents of pronouns within the framework of CIPT. For this purpose, we select a dialogue of hotel reservation as a domain-restricted discourse, and discourse, and discuss the characteristics of the distribution of pronouns. We suggest that we need to palce the Slot-Link element on the top of the forward centering list. We claim that we need to establish a constraint on conceptual compatibility. As for the pronouns in the global dialogue, we propose a constraint of discourse command.

• 전자공학회논문지B
• /
• 제33B권3호
• /
• pp.159-168
• /
• 1996

In this paper, the natural language dialogue understanding sytem, based on discourse information and plan recognition, is designed and implemented. The system needs to analyze the user's input utterance and acquire the discoruse information to perform plan recognition and facilitate cooperative response. This paper proposes the mehtod of controlling a dialogue, based on the algorithm for extracting the discourse information. When the discourse information for dialogue understanding is extracted, the information-based value in feature structure that is obtained form korean parser is used. And the system makes use of the structure. Thus it can offer the response that the user wants to take, and let the dialogue to study in utterance level and enhance the efficiency of dialogue understanding. In this paper, we apply the system to the hotel reservation domain and show the mehtod of using the discoruse information to control the dialogue.

• 한국정보과학회논문지:컴퓨팅의 실제 및 레터
• /
• 제16권10호
• /
• pp.1005-1009
• /
• 2010

지시대명사와 같은 조응어(anaphora)의 본래 단어나 구를 선행사라고 지칭하며, 음성 대화 중에는 선행사에 대한 생략과 대용어 사용이 빈번히 발생한다. 또한 언어 현상들은 문맥을 보지 않으면 이해될 수 없는 것들이 많다는 것이 담화분석의 기본 가정이므로, 생략 및 대용어 복원은 담화분석에서 매우 중요한 역할을 한다. 본 논문에서는 대용어와 생략어 복원에 기반해서 대화 레벨에서의 강건성을 향상시킨 음성 기반 대화 시스템을 제안한다. 제안된 항법의 적절성과 효과는 TV 도메인에서 평가되었다.

• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제19권
• /
• pp.251-270
• /
• 2010

The subject of the paper is to discern the validity of the translation theory put forward by the ESIT(Ecole Sup?rieur d'Interpr?tes et de Tranducteurs, Universit? Paris III) and how it differentiates from the other translation theories. First, the paper will analyze the theoretical aspects put forward by examining the equivalence that may be discerned between the french and korean translation in relation to the original english text that is being translated. Employing the equivalence in translation may shed new insights into the unterminable discussions we witness today between the literal translation and the free translation. Contrary to the formal equivalence the dynamic equivalence by Nida suggests that the messages retain the same meanings whether it be the original or a translated text to the/for the reader. In short, the object of the dynamic equivalence is to identify the closest equivalence to the suggested source language. The concept of correspondence and equivalence defined by theoriticians of translation falls to the domain of dynamic equivalence suggested by Nida. In translation theory the domain of usage of language and the that of discourse is denoted separately. by usage one denotes the translation through symbols that make up language itself. In contrast to this, the discourse is suggestive of defining the newly created expressions which may be denoted as being a creative equivalence which embodies the original message for the singular situation at hand. The translator will however find oneself incorporating the two opposing theories in translating. Translation falls under the criteria of text and not of language, thus one cannot regulate or foresee any special circumstances that may arise in translation of discourse, the translation to reflect this condition should always be delimited. All other translation should be subject to translation by equivalence. The interpretation theory in translation (of ESIT) in effect is relative to both the empirical and philosophical approach and is suggestive of new perspective in translation. In conclusion, the above suggested translation theory is different from the skopos theory and the polysystem theory in that it only takes in to account the elements that are in close relation to the original text, and also that it was developed for educational purposes opening new perspectives in the domain of translation theories.

• 정보화정책
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.43-63
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 인터넷 다국어도메인의 국제표준화에 대한 국제커뮤니케이션을 분석하여 그 대중화 실패 요인을 이해하고자 한다. 조직화 이론을 활용하여 ICANN에서 다국어도메인에 대한 필요성이 제기되는 초기 담론을 관찰하고, 기술적으로 계층적 방식이 선택되는 과정에서 어떤 갈등이 있었는지 살펴보며, 선택된 결정이 주요 이해당사자들에게 어떻게 받아들여졌는지 살펴본다. 분석 결과, 대중화 실패 요인은 미국을 중심으로 하는 ICANN과 그 필요성을 제기하였던 비영어권 국가 간의 인식론적 차이에서 찾을 수 있다. '정보격차 해소'와 '문화적 가치 추구'라는 담론은 '인터넷 인프라의 안정성'이라는 ICANN의 기술적 담론과 충돌한다. 이로써 국제표준화는 10년이라는 오랜 시간이 걸렸고 시장에서는 다양한 서비스들이 난립하는 결과를 초래하였다. 한국의 적용 사례를 보면, 도메인 무단 점유, 홍보 비용, 기술적 불안정성 및 이용자의 혼란 등 사회적 역효과가 대중들에게 외면받게 되는 요인으로 작용하였고 정부는 일관성 있는 정책을 제시하는데 실패했다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.139-162
• /
• 2006

이 연구에서는 도메인분석에 대해서 이론적으로 고찰함으로써 문헌정보학적 관점에서의 지식이론과 문헌정보학의 이론적 틀을 제시함과 동시에 문헌정보학의 연구방법론에 일반원칙을 제시하였다. 도메인분석에서 핵심적인 개념은 도메인을 구성하는 주제지식과 그 지식을 공유하는 담론 커뮤니티라고 할 수 있다. 따라서 도메인의 정의를 제시하고 도메인을 존재론적. 인식론적. 사회학적 차원에서 살펴보았으며, 도메인분석에서 이용할 수 있는 11가지 연구방법을 제시하였다. 그리고 도메인분석이 문헌정보학에서 가지는 함의를 사회-인지적 관점과 실용적 사실주의의 입장에서 검토하였다.