• 동아시아식생활학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.328-339
• /
• 2010

이 연구의 목적은 패스트 푸드 산업에서 '서비스의 질'(Service Quality)을 측정할 수 있는 신뢰도 높은 측정 스케일을 개발하는 것이다. 선행 연구들은 SERVQUAL, SERVPERF, DINESERV 등의 스케일들을 개발해왔다. 하지만, 이론적 배경과 문헌고찰을 통해서, 이러한 선행 스케일들은 패스트 푸드 산업의 특성과는 적합하지 않다는 주장이 제시되었다. 따라서, 본 연구는 Cronin & Taylor(1992)의 이론적 배경을 바탕으로, '서비스의 질'은 소비자들의 태도이고, 이러한 점에서 그 회사에 대한 거시적 평가라는 부분에 초점을 맞추어, SERVPERF 아이템들을 initial pool로 선택하여 패스트 푸드 산업에 실무적으로 쓰일 수 있는 새로운 스케일을 개발하였다. 6단계에 걸친 체계적인 스케일 개발 과정들을 거쳐서 13개로 구성된 새로운 측정 스케일이 개발되었고, 3가지 하위 요인들(Responsiveness, Tangibles, and Reliability) 이 도출되었다. 패스트 푸드 레스토랑에 가는 빈도가 높은 소비자 그룹과의 심층 인터뷰를 통해서 기존의 SERVPERF 아이템들이 수정/보완되었다. 이렇게 수정/보완된 아이템들을 통계적으로 재평가하기 위해서 112명의 대학생 샘플로부터 얻어진 데이터를 이용하여 탐색적 요인 분석이 시행되었고, 아이템들이 통계적으로 재평가되었다. 마지막으로, 179명으로 구성된 패스트 푸드 레스토랑 소비자 그룹 데이터를 이용하여 확인적 요인 분석이 실시되어 convergent validity, discriminant validity, and internal consistency가 검증되었다. 새로 개발된 스케일은 이론적/통계적으로 유의하며, 신뢰도가 높다는 것이 확인되었다. 이를 바탕으로 실무적/이론적 시사점이 논의 되었다.

• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제58권3호
• /
• pp.27-49
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 구조적 차원성 탐색을 통한 최성재의 '노인 생활 만족도 척도'의 재검증을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 충주지역에 거주하는 65세 이상 노인 275명의 자료가 분석되었다. 연구 결과 '노인 생활 만족도 척도'는 세 개의 이론적 구인으로 구성된 다차원 구조를 갖는 것으로 분석되었다. 규명된 구인은 '긍정적 정서와 주관적 만족감', '부정적 자아상과 부정적 정서', 그리고 '자기 가치'로 명명되었다. 세 구인 모두 높은 신뢰도를 보였으며 '내적 구조에 근거한 타당도' 또한 모두 높은 것으로 분석되었다. '긍정적 정서와 주관적 만족감' 그리고 '부정적 자아상과 부정적 정서'는 수렴 타당도와 판별 타당도가 모두 높은 것으로 나타났다. '자기 가치'는 높은 수렴 타당도를 보인 반면 판별 타당도는 상대적으로 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 '노인 생활 만족도 척도'를 단일 차원 구조로 제시한 개발자의 견해와 달리 '노인생활 만족도 척도'의 다차원 구조를 검증함으로써 다수의 선행 연구 결과를 지지한다. 끝으로 '노인 생활 만족도 척도'의 구조적 차원성이 개발자의 연구와 본 연구에서 상이하게 나타난 원인이 논의되었다.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제10권1호통권19호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 1992

The purpose of this study was to validate the Elementary HOME(Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment) with korean elementary children. Subjects were 536 mothers 1st-5th graders in the elementary schools in the Seoul. Pearson's r, pearcentage(%), phi($\phi$/), Cronbach's $\alpha$/ ware conducted for the statistical analysis. The major findings were as follows. 1) The item pass rate(percentage) were ranged 16~98. 2) The discriminant coefficients($\phi$/) of the item were ranged 0.06~0.58. 3) The reliability coefficients of the scale were that the split-falf was 0.84, and Cronbach's $\alpha$/ was 0.88. Considering the length of the scale, these reliability estimates appear to be at an acceptable level 4) The factor analysis and the correlations between HOME and SES indices and children's school schievement to test construct validity were conducted to test construct validity. Eight factors were extracted from the factor analysis and coefficients(r) were ranged 0.16~0.45 and -0.08~0.37.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.109-121
• /
• 2002

The subjects of this validation of the Antisocial Behavior Scale(ABS) consisted of 323 normal and 29 clinically referred preschoolers between the ages of four and six years. The ABS has 3 factors: oppositional/aggression, nonsocial/egoism, and inattention. Results showed high test-retest reliability(r=.83-.90). The scale discriminated between the normal and clinical groups. The first(oppositional/aggression) and the third(inattention) factors of the ABS, measuring externalizing behaviors, correlated highly with the Externalizing Problems and Attention Problems Scales of the Korean Version of Child Behavior Checklist(K-CBCL). The second(nonsocial/egoism) factor of the ABS, measuring emotional areas correlated highly with the Emotional Liability Scale of the K-CBCL.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.152-164
• /
• 2012

This study develops a valid and reliable scale to evaluate customer orientation for clothing salespeople in order to provide a foundation for systematic and empirical research in the apparel industry. The study was conducted in two phases. First, a scale was developed to evaluate the customer orientation of clothing salespeople through a qualitative method. The second phase involved the verification of the validity of the developed evaluation questions through a quantitative method. The subjects of this study were 327 clothing salespeople, and the results were analyzed using AMOS 7.0 and SPSS 15.0. The results were as follows: First, customer orientation questions were elicited from in-depth interviews with fashion sales-people, analyses of fashion magazine articles, and previous studies. From the results, 38 preliminary questions were selected based on categorization, modification, and expert analyses of the content validity. Second, in order to verify the validity of the customer orientation scale that consisted of 24 questions in 7 factors, we performed a verification of the convergent validity through an assessment of the magnitude of standardization factor loading, average variance extracted (AVE), and construct reliability. Discriminant validity was verified using the AVE of each of the two constructs and a comparison of the square of the correlation between the constructs. According to the results, the measured values were above or near the guideline values that demonstrates the validity of the customer orientation scale.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.431-442
• /
• 2016

Purpose: This paper was conducted to validate the Korean version of the Peer Group Caring Interaction Scale (PGCIS-K) that measures caring behaviors as experienced by nursing students. Methods: Translation of the PGCIS-K was validated through forward-backward translation methods. Survey data were collected from 218 nursing students in a nursing school. Construct validity and criterion-related validity were evaluated. Internal consistency and the Guttman split-half coefficient were calculated to assess reliability. Results: The PGIS-K showed reliability except for 4 items (Cronbach's ${\alpha}=.91$, Guttman split-half coefficient=.85), which were low (<.30) or negatively correlated with the total scale. A 12-item reduced form of the PGCIS-K was developed by item-analysis and construct validity evidence. Factor loading for the 12 items on 2 factors ranged from .47~.82, which explained 58.4% of the total variance. Two factors were named 'modeling and assistance (Cronbach's ${\alpha}=.87$)' and 'communication and sharing (Cronbach's ${\alpha}=.82$)'. Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion validity were supported according to the correlation coefficients of the 2 factors with other measure. Conclusion: The findings suggest preliminary evidence that the 12-item PGCIS-K can be used to measure nursing students' peer group caring interactions in Korea. Additional studies are recommended to continue the psychometric evaluation of this scale. Also, it can be extended to measure graduate nursing students or staff nurses' peer group caring interaction.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제38권6호
• /
• pp.881-890
• /
• 2008

Purpose: Research related to social support in Korea has been hampered by paucity of measurement tools reflecting Korean culture. The aim of the study was to develop Korean social support questionnaire (KSSQ) based on the Korean social support pyramid and to test psychometric properties of the KSSQ. Methods: The questionnaire was administered to 701 subjects and 658 college students. Psychometric analyses included factor analyses, expert validity, criterion-related validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Results: A principal components analysis support for construct validity, eliciting a three factor solution accounting for 65.46% of variance in scores. Concurrent and discriminant validity supported criterion-related validity. Internal consistency of reliability was support with Cronbach's alpha of .97-.98 for the entire scale. Test-retest reliability was .76. Conclusion: This initial testing of KSSQ to measure Korean social support demonstrates evidence of reliability and validity. Assessment of known-group validity and norm establishment of KSSQ are suggested to provide further sound psychometric properties and practical measurement tools.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.201-227
• /
• 2022

한국 고등학교 학생들에게 적합한 수학불안 요인 측정도구를 개발하기 위하여 요인 탐색, 문항 개발, 타당도 및 신뢰도 검증의 단계로 연구를 실시하였다. 이를 위하여 문헌분석을 통해 기 개발되어 사용되어온 문항을 수정 보완하고, 학생들을 대상으로 한 개방형 조사를 통해 사교육 및 수학 교수 방법에 대한 시대적 배경을 반영한 신규 문항을 추가하였다. 개발된 측정문항에 대한 탐색적 요인분석과 확인적 요인분석을 통해 타당도를 검증하였으며, 연구 결과, 수학교과의 특성에 기인하는 불안 요인이 구체화되었고, 모둠학습이나 발표수업 등과 같은 교수학습 방법 등이 반영되었다.

• Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.110-120
• /
• 2022

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to confirm the factor structure of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQOL-R) in the context of Korean culture and to verify its reliability and validity. Methods: The participants comprised terminal cancer patients aged 25 or older, and data from 164 participants were analyzed. The study was conducted in the following order: translation, expert review, reverse translation, preliminary investigation and interviews, and completion of the final version. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to evaluate the validity of the instrument, and the Beck Depression Inventory, Korean version (K-BDI) was applied to confirm the criterion validity of the MQOL-R Korean version. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient, representing internal consistency, was measured to evaluate reliability. Results: Cronbach's alpha for all 14 questions was 0.862. The model fit indices for confirmatory factor analysis were within the acceptance criteria. The factor loadings of all four factors were over 0.50, and convergent validity and discriminant validity were confirmed. Regarding criterion validity, a negative correlation was found between the four factors of MQOL-R Korean version and the K-BDI. Conclusion: The MQOL-R Korean version, the reliability and validity of which were verified in this study, is a 15-item tool consisting of 14 items dealing with four physical, psychological, existential, and social factors and a single item evaluating the overall quality of life. The MQOL-R Korean version is an instrument that can more concisely and effectively measure the quality of life of patients with life-threatening diseases.

• 사물인터넷융복합논문지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.93-102
• /
• 2024

본 연구의 목적은 유아교사들의 디지털 역량 수준을 측정할 수 있는 도구를 개발하기 위해 디지털 역량 지표에 대한 타당성을 검토하는 것이다. 이를 위해 유아교사 272명 대상으로 자료를 수집한 후 탐색적 요인분석과 확인적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 탐색적 요인분석 결과 4개 요인이 도출되었으며 확인적 요인분석을 통해 각 역량군과 하위역량지표 구성 모형에 대한 적합도, 타당도(집중타당도, 판별타당도) 및 신뢰도를 검증하였다. 최종적으로 검증된 4요인은 '디지털 기술 이해', '디지털 기술 활용', '디지털 기술 기반 상호작용', '디지털 윤리 이해 및 실천' 역량군으로 명명하였다. 분석결과를 통해 유아교사들의 디지털 역량을 측정하는 도구에 대한 신뢰도와 타당도를 입증할 수 있었고 본 연구결과는 유아교사들의 디지털 역량을 측정하고 각 디지털 역량 수준에 적합한 교육을 실시하는데 기초를 제공할 수 있다는 점에서 의의가 있다.