• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제69권1호
• /
• pp.175-197
• /
• 2017

이 연구는 우리나라 사회복지 전달체계의 형성과 경로를 '사회복지' 담론의 작용과 결부시켜 분석해 보고, 그에 따른 쟁점 현안을 설명해보려는 것이다. 연구 방법으로는 역사적 제도주의의 관점에서 경로의존적 변화와 분기점 분석 접근을 채택했으며, '사회복지' 용법의 담론적 기호와 맥락들에 대한 추출은 법제적 역사 자료들을 중심으로 했다. 연구의 결과는 다음을 제시한다. 첫째, 우리나라에서 '사회복지' 담론이 태동되는 기점은 1961년 "생활보호법" 제정 때이다. 둘째, 1987년을 기점으로 하는 사회복지관 사업 확장 및 사회복지전담공무원의 채용은 '사회복지' 담론이 전달체계를 통해 제도적 형성을 이룬 사건이다. 셋째, 근래에 이르기까지 사회복지 전달체계의 경로적 변화는 큰 틀에서 이 같은 담론의 범주를 벗어나지 않은 채 내적 확장과 조정의 형태로 이루어져 왔다. 넷째, 2015년을 전후로 해서 사회복지 전달체계의 기축 제도들에서 탈'사회복지' 용법이 가시화되고 있다. 결론적으로는, 이것이 1960년대 이래 지속되어온 '사회복지' 담론의 해체를 뜻하는지, 그렇다면 그에 기반한 전달체계의 조직과 인력, 전문성 요소들에 대한 정향이 보다 근원적 차원에서 논의될 필요가 있음을 밝힌다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 2013

Stochastic phenomena induce us to construct a probability model and structure our thinking; corresponding models help us to understand and interpret the reality. They in turn equip us with tools to recognize, reconstruct and solve problems. Therefore, various implications in terms of methodology as well as epistemology naturally flow from different adoptions of models for probability. Right from the basic scenarios of different perspectives to explore reality, students are occasionally exposed to misunderstanding and misinterpretations. With realistic examples a multi-faceted image of probability and different interpretation will be considered in mathematical modelling activities. As an exploratory investigation, mathematical modelling activity for probability learning was elaborated through semiotic analysis. Especially, the coherence structure in mathematical modelling discourse was reviewed form a semiotic perspective. The discourses sampled from group activities were analyzed on the basis of semiotic perspectives taxonomical coherence relations.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제4호
• /
• pp.15-38
• /
• 1998

The main purpose of this paper is to take a look at a controversial approach to critical discourse analysis for the suggestion of a well-balanced perspective on such a biased presupposition and methodology. Currently linguists, language teachers and even social scientists have shown their strong interests in critical language awareness and its ideological involvements in order to encourage the general public to realize the social function of language in all modes of communication. It seems, however, to me to be increasingly clear that critical language study calls for a careful attempt based on an appropriate combination of textual facts and contextual factors in the interpretation of discourses. From this point, of view, this paper suggests some pedagogic / analytical guidelines for a study on language and its social connotations as a result of examining the cogency of two contrasting argumentations in relation to critical discourse analysis.

• 한국언어정보학회지:언어와정보
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.53-79
• /
• 1998

This paper is an attempt to give an account of presupposition inheritance (henceforth PI) in conditionals from a functional-discourse perspective. The focus of study is on how to evaluate the embedded presupposition (EP) nested in the hypothetical world. I propose the view that if the EP satisfies the condition on the presupposition satisfaction, it becomes background information in the relevant world, arguing against the theories which employ simple cancellation or disappearance of those EPs. The discourse processing among discourse participants is to be considered in the light of functional significance for the explication of the contrastive mechanism of presupposition and assertion. I advance a revised model of PI in conditionals and analyze several problematic cases of conditionals, with a particular attention to their DRSs.

• Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.90-117
• /
• 2019

How is science advice integrated in environmental policymaking? This is an increasingly pertinent question that is being raised since the nuclear catastrophe of Fukushima, Japan, in 2011. Global re-evaluation of energy policies and climate mitigation measures include discussions on how to better integrate science advice in policymaking, and at the same time keeping science independent from political influence. This paper addressed the policy discourse of setting up a national CO2 reduction target in Japanese policymaking between 2009 and 2012. The target proposed by the former DPJ government was turned down, and Japan lacked a clear strategy for long-term climate mitigation. The analysis provides explanations from a quantitative actor-network perspective. Centrality measures from social network analysis for policy actors in an environmental policy network of Japan were calculated to identify those actors that control the discourse. Data used for analysis comes from the Global Environmental Policy Actor Network 2 (GEPON 2) survey conducted in Japan (2012-13). Science advice in Japan was kept independent from political influence and was mostly excluded from policymaking. One of the two largest discourse coalitions in the environmental policy network promoted a higher CO2 reduction target for international negotiations but favored lowering the target after a new international agreement would have been set. This may explain why Japan struggled to commit to long-term mitigation strategies. Applying social network analysis to quantitatively calculate discourse coalitions was a feasible methodology for investigating "discursive power." But limited in discussing the "practice" (e.g. meetings, telephone, or email conversations) among the actors in discourse coalitions.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제52권6호
• /
• pp.384-392
• /
• 2019

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the health inequality discourse in the Korean press by analyzing newspaper articles using a relatively new content analysis technique. Methods: This study used the search term "health inequality" to collect articles containing that term that were published between 2000 and 2018. The collected articles went through pre-processing and topic modeling, and the contents and temporal trends of the extracted topics were analyzed. Results: A total of 1038 articles were identified, and 5 topics were extracted. As the number of studies on health inequality has increased over the past 2 decades, so too has the number of news articles regarding health inequality. The extracted topics were public health policies, social inequalities in health, inequality as a social problem, healthcare policies, and regional health gaps. The total number of occurrences of each topic increased every year, and the trend observed for each theme was influenced by events related to its contents, such as elections. Finally, the frequency of appearance of each topic differed depending on the type of news source. Conclusions: The results of this study can be used as preliminary data for future attempts to address health inequality in Korea. To make addressing health inequality part of the public agenda, the media's perspective and discourse regarding health inequality should be monitored to facilitate further strategic action.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제12권7호
• /
• pp.378-393
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 십 수 년 간 언론매체를 통해 돔구장 건설 관련한 담론이 어떻게 형성되고 또 재생산되었는지를 파악하고자 하였다. 특히 신문을 중심으로 한 언론매체들이 돔구장과 관련하여 그동안 어떠한 사회적 담론을 구성했는지를 과정적 맥락적인 관점에서 바라봄으로써 돔구장과 관련된 정치적, 경제적, 그리고 사회문화적 맥락에 대한 논리적인 이해와 해석을 시도하고자 하였다. 이를 통해 본 연구는 크게 세 가지 측면의 사회적 담론이 형성되었음을 확인할 수 있었다. 첫 번째로, 돔구장 건립을 찬성하고 지지하는 '찬성'담론이 형성되었다. 여기에서 가장 핵심적인 담론은 야구발전과 중흥을 염원하는 '야구계의 숙원사업', 그리고 도시 이미지 제고와 지역경제 발전으로 대변되는 '돔구장 건설의 경제적 효과'였다. 두 번째로 돔구장 건설을 반대하고 비판하는 '반대' 담론이 형성되었다. 반대담론의 중심에는 '사업절차의 투명성 부족'과 '수익 타당성 부재'라는 인식이 강하게 자리 잡았다. 돔구장 건설에 대한 찬성과 반대의 대립구도 속에서 세 번째로 민 관이 '소통'과 '참여'를 통해 야구장 문제를 합리적으로 해결해야 한다는 거버넌스 담론이 등장하게 되었다.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.1-45
• /
• 2012

This paper reviews the emerging literature on innovation policy from a practitioner's perspective, reviews the policy implications of an evolutionary perspective in economics, and identifies newly emerging areas of innovation policy analysis. We show that an innovation system is a dominant policy discourse, that there are limits of policy implications from an evolutionary perspective, and that there is a need for explicitly policy motivated analysis grounded in a broad evolutionary perspective. Innovation policy studies are an area in pre-paradigmatic stages whose dynamism originates from the interaction of theory, policy, and policy learning. The limited usefulness of policy implications derived directly from either conceptual or empirical analysis requires more explicitly policy focused research.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.239-256
• /
• 2001

The notion of metaphor has been increasingly popular in research of mathematics education. In particular, metaphor becomes a useful unit for analysis to provide a profound insight into mathematical reasoning and problem solving. In this context, this paper takes metaphor as an analytic unit to examine the relationship between objectivity and subjectivity in mathematical reasoning. Specifically, the discourse analysis focuses on the code switching between literal language and metaphor in mathematical discourse. It is shown that the linguistic code switching is parallel with the switching between two different kinds of mathematical knowledge, that is, factual knowledge and mathematical imagination, which constitute objectivity and subjectivity in mathematical reasoning. Furthermore, the pattern of the linguistic code switching reveals the dialectical relationship between the two poles of mathematical reasoning. Based on the understanding of the dialectical relationship, this paper provides some educational implications. First, the code-switching highlights diverse aspects of mathematics learning. Learning mathematics is concerned with developing not only technicality but also mathematical creativity. Second, the dialectical relationship between objectivity and subjectivity suggests that teaching and teaming mathematics is socioculturally constructed. Indeed, it is shown that not all metaphors are mathematically appropriated. They should be consistent with the cultural model of a mathematical concept under discussion. In general, this sociocultural perspective on mathematical metaphor highlights the sociocultural organization of teaching and loaming mathematics and provides a theoretical viewpoint to understand epistemological diversities in mathematics classroom.

• 인문언어
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.107-121
• /
• 2001

This paper examines the way in which the idea of language has been introduced in architectural discourse since the late 1960s. The paper reviews the works of Robert Venturi, Charles Jencks, Peter Eisenman, Alan Colquhoun, and Mario Gandelsonas, which explore the analogy between linguistic and architectural form. All of the writers above are responsive to each other's theoretical positions, sometimes implicitly and sometimes explicitly. A system of signs can be approached by asking how the lexicon and syntax are proportioned. The same question may be posed to architecture: can architecture be understood as a lexicon or as a relational structure, such as language is\ulcorner Two perspectives are presented by architectural theorists. The first advocated by Venturi and Jencks posit architectural form as a problem of signs. The problem with this perspective is that, it reduces architecture into popularized iconography in favor of the representational aspects of architectural form. The second perspective, developed by Eisenman, explores the possibility of finding new formal constructs in the abstract relationship of formal properties. Eisenman's theory, however, has its own problems for, in highlighting syntactic structure, it minimizes the distinction between the perceptual and the pragmatic dimensions. Yet both perspectives address crucial problems of contemporary architecture and expand architectural discourse into the broader realm of humanistic studies.