• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.87-101
• /
• 2002

This paper serves to analyze the points of views un women in enlightenment discourse of the equality of sexes during the enlightenment period of Korea (1860 1910). The discourses of newspapers that are the text of this study have been analyzed with qualitative research technique. The major conclusions that are derived from the study are as follows. First, enlightenment discourse of the equality of sexes criticized women’s inferior status in family and in society. Second, the discourse, however, claimed the women's rights with the view of national interests, which meant that the ultimate goal of the discourse was not the enhancement of women's rights. Women during the enlightenment period were recognized as a member of a nation while they should also role as a member of If. The discourse also claimed that the equality of sexes could be realized through education and emphasized especially women's role as a mother who should raise a member of a nation. Third, enlightenment discourse would not understand the women's every day lives that resulted in demanding women more roles in the name of civilization.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제20권6호
• /
• pp.57-76
• /
• 2011

This study is on the pedagogical convention of architectural history in Korea, especially that of Western Architecture. Recent institutional change in architectural school in Korea has caused overall restructuring of academic program. In spite of extension in the field of history there was no progress of method and way of thinking. There is no change in the point of view to see the western architecture and its history as a unique and specialized phenomenon in the civilization of mankind. Because of no recognition about for what, for whom, and how to, and because of orientalism, the cultural position of western architectural history and its narrative was not asked. With the help of post-colonialism, de-constructivism and critical historiography this paper tries to show the fundamental premise of western architectural history as a myth and show its prejudice as not being justifiable. The background of the discourse there has been a representation effect with regard to knowledge as a power. we need to escape from this kind of cognitional frame With the analysis of the its premise and narrative we can find it is a historical construct that was made in the age of imperialism. In fact it has a lot of false information and problematic point of view. The Identity and originality of western architecture and its history has no logical reason or foundation if we think that it depends on the difference and comparison with other civilization. For example the explanation of its historical origin western architecture has big difference with Islamic architecture in spite of the resemblance each other. This paper try to show several reasons that discourse of western architectural history can not be survived any longer. So we need to reconstruct new pedagogy with deconstruction for the students of non western, or Korean students. Because it has important effect to see and think about architecture and its history.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.633-642
• /
• 2016

이 글은 근대시기 일본의 한국인식을 당대의 한국 담론과 교과서 콘텐츠를 중심으로 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 민족성, 역사인식, 한국의 사회상으로 주제를 설정하고 교육 잡지를 중심으로 각 주제에 관해 형성되었던 담론과 이들 담론들이 투영된 교과서 교사용 지도서의 서술내용들을 살펴보았다. 민족성에 관해서는 나태 무기력 미개라는 단어로 대표되는 부정적 측면에서 인식하는 성향이 강하게 나타났다. 그리고 한국 역사를 수동적, 타율적 성격으로 규정하고 무능한 국가운영으로 인해 부정적 민족성이 형성되었다고 보고 있다. 그리고 더 나아가서는 독립을 유지할 능력이 없는 한국은 일본과 동양의 평화를 위협하는 존재이며 결국은 한일강제병합에 이르렀다는 것이 한국 역사에 대한 인식이다. 또한, 일본이 한국사회를 평가하는 척도는 서구식 문명화였으며 한국사회의 모습을 문명 문화의 정도가 낮은 전근대적 사회로 규정하고 있었다. 근대시기 일본에서 형성된 한국에 대한 담론에는 근대국가로 탈바꿈한 일본의 자신감과 제국주의의 길을 걷게 된 일본의 지배이데올로기가 강하게 반영되어 있었고 이와 같은 담론은 교과서와 지도서를 통해서 학생들에게 확산되고 있었다.

• 영어영문학
• /
• 제57권3호
• /
• pp.391-411
• /
• 2011

This paper examines Du Boisian critique of American exceptionalism through a close textual analysis of his writings from early essays to later works. As an attempt to respond to the persistent grip American exceptionalism has on both the academia and the intellectual world at large, this paper tries to fill in the gaps within the discourse of American exceptionalism by exploring the works of one of the most towering American intellectual figures, and suggests that the discourse of American exceptionalism has remained within the purview of white scholars. Although at times inconsistent and contradictory, Du Bois's trenchant critique of American civilization and Western imperialism deconstructs the original ideals of America, creating more than a fissure in the ideology/hegemony/state fantasy of American exceptionalism. I argue that Du Boisian critique of American exceptionalism shows its violent marginalization and racialization based on white supremacy. Du Boisian critique should be a cautionary tale for those scholars who talk of "reform" or "replenishment" or even who occlude the possibility that American exceptionalism has not always functioned as a "state fantasy" by assuming its absolute blinding powers.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제18권
• /
• pp.81-99
• /
• 2004

This text discusses trends in the construction of religions since the Meiji Era, using Konkokyo and Restoration Shintoism as examples. The construction of religions is applied here as the process of a deliberate acceptace of religious images as a discourse of "Civilization" endowed with "kyougi" or "Doctrine" and "kyousoku" or "Rules of Instruction." Winding through a meandering path, these constructed religions do not take precedence over "Jikyou" or "State Religion." Yet, "Jikyou" for a while was fixed in its own fragemented self-imagery. As for Shinto, in 1900, the Office of Shinto Shrines became independent from the Office of Shrines and Temples in the Department of Domestic Affairs, and clearly Shinto and Shinto Shrines were part of secular state ideology. In the Bakumatsu and Meiji Periods, it ultimately was cut off from Restoration Shinto, thereby achieving this development on its own. This tells of the formation of an entirely new and modern Shinto within a secular "Jikyou." Konkokyo, moreover, as a religion establishes "kyousoku" and "kyougi." As a Shinto sect, it takes steps on the path toward recognizing a self-identity, namely as religious Shinto. As a result, dogmatization and systemization progress, and "Byoukinaoshi" or "illness-recovery" from the Tokugawa Period weathers. Also, as for progress in the Shinto religious order, from its foundation, the characteristics of a unified state and religion emerge, and thus there is an acceptance of significant restrictions. This dillema continues to persist as a problem in postwar Japan. Shedding light on Tokugawa Era practice also sheds light on where we can now take religious concepts.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.628-633
• /
• 2010

1910년대 주거담론은 위생론 일반을 다루는 글, 여성의 주택청결 관리를 계몽하는 글 그리고 일본인이 한국전통주택을 관찰하고 평가하는 글에서 등장한다. 1900년대의 그것과 비교하면 위생에 초점을 두는 점은 같지만 깊이와 양에서 매우 위축되어 있다. 담론의 주체와 맥락도 달라졌다. 1900년대 주거담론은 위생을 국가의 문명화와 부국강병을 위한 방법론으로 인식한 개화론자들이 주도했고 국가의 공중위생 책무를 강조하는 담론과 함께 전개되었다면, 1910년대는 여름철이나 환절기 전염병을 예방 차원에서 개인위생을 계몽하는 의사나 의료관료들을 통해 주로 개진되었다. 1910년대 조선총독부의 환경위생사업에서 식민지 조선인의 거주지와 주택은 제외되어 불결했고, 공중위생정책에서 차별받는 그들에게 주거의 청결은 개인의 책임지고 해결해야 할 문제였다. 주택의 불결은 민족적 미개함 열등함의 표상이 되었고 식민지지배의 당위성을 공고히 하는 효과를 낳았다. 또한 1920년대 주거개량 문제가 조선인의 인종적 개량과 문명화의 과제로서 논의되는 데 심리적 배경이 되었다.

• 영어영문학
• /
• 제64권2호
• /
• pp.219-238
• /
• 2018

This essay examines the first-generation Korean American writer, No-Yong Park's falsehoods about his ethnic identity to suggest how and why he passed for Chinese, and to explore the political, anti-Japanese implications of these actions. The essay first identifies erroneous information circulating about his biographical background, presents some other materials that help us better understand the context in which he forged his Chinese identity, and then examines how he represented himself as Chinese in his published works. I would argue that Park's self-identification as Chinese was a resulting outcome of his naturalization caused by the Japanese colonial power in Korea and also one of his surviving strategies in the racist environment within American society. Looking at some of his works-including Making a New China (1929), An Oriental View of American Civilization (1934), Chinaman's Chance: Autobiography (1940)-and examining how he represented Korea and its people reveal how he tried to raise voice for them. By doing so, this essay illuminates Park's resistance to Japan's colonial discourse and power in Korea while revealing his lifetime passing as Chinese-far from his refusal to belong to the Korean community, or to acknowledge being Korean.

• 한국철학논집
• /
• 제50호
• /
• pp.171-200
• /
• 2016

1910년대에 들어서면서 본격화한 일제의 '조선' 연구가 식민 정책의 일환이었다면 그에 대항하는 조선 연구는 국권 회복과 자주 독립의 염원을 담고 있었다. 이는 당대 '조선'이라는 개념이 발화주체에 따라 그 안에 내포된 의미와 지향이 상이했음을 의미한다. 대한제국의 소멸과 함께 근대 국가 건설은 좌절됐지만 민족의 이념 지형 안에서 '조선'은 새롭게 발견되었다. '조선'은 과거의 경험을 응축하면서 미래에 대한 기대를 담아내는 역사적 기본개념이 되어갔다. '조선학'은 학술의 장에 국한된 지식인들 사이의 담론이었으나, '조선'은 그 내 외부의 보다 다양한 사회 주체들의 발화를 포괄한다. 더욱이 개념과 담론의 상호 연관을 고려한다면 '조선학'은 '조선'의 역사적 의미론 속에서 독해되어야 마땅하다. 1920년대 문화운동의 흥기 속에서 안확은 "조선문명사"를 통해 고대 신화의 시대로부터 당대까지를 '조선'이라는 기표 아래에 묶어낸다. 역사 실증주의의 미명 아래 자행된 일제의 역사 왜곡에 맞서 조선의 역사를 서양 민주주의 정체에 비견해도 뒤지지 않는 문명으로 이상화한다. 안확은 '조선' 연구를 문화 전반으로 확장하는 가운데 조선의 미술과 문학을 넘어 조선철학의 탄생을 예고했다. "조선철학사상개관"은 '조선철학'을 하나의 독립적 학문영역으로 사고한 최초의 기술로써, 조선의 학술과 사상의 특수성을 인류의 보편적 문명사의 관점에서 파악하려했던 작업의 일환이었다. 안확은 철학을 조선의 3대 발달 가운데 하나로 제시하고, 조선 철학사의 특색을 서양과 비교하여 특정함으로써 조선철학의 고유성과 독자성을 주장했다. '종(倧)'을 조선철학의 시원이자 근세에까지 이르는 사상적 근저로 파악하면서 불교와 유교의 수용도 조선철학의 발전으로 인식했다. 전통 지식체계의 근대적 전환과정에서 탄생한 '조선철학'은 전통 지를 근대적 학문 분류 체계에 적용하여 재해석하고 재구축하는 지적 실험이었다.

• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제1호
• /
• pp.109-144
• /
• 2003

Orientalness is a concept that expresses the collective identity of the Orient in relation to the West. The concept itself is mutable and defined by the relationship between the two regions at different points in time. Changes in the concept depend on a number of factors, such as cultural influence, the political balance of power between the two regions, and on the interpretative scheme that defines the relationship. In addition, the geographical notion of the concept evolves culturally, socially and politically. During this process, Oriental-ness becomes Oriental-ism at times. I will attempt to survey and measure the progression of Orientalness from its emergence in early 17th century to its subsequent transformation in modern Korea as reflected in art theory and art works. The recognition of the comparative characteristics of Oriental art began when the Orient was exposed to the art of the West in the late Ming dynasty during the early 17th century. The changes in the artistic climate in China affected the late Chosun. I will start with a brief introduction of this time and the birth of Orientalness. The concept gradually changed during the period of Enlightenment(開化期) towards the end of the 19th century, and during the colonial period( 1910-1945) it took on a new form. Establishment of the concept of "Orient"as a single, unifying concept spanning across cultures and national boundaries has been attributed to late Meiji period Japan, whose intention at that time is believed to have been to build a pan-Asia(亞細亞) empire with Japan at its commanding center. It has been stressed that the real motive behind the formation of one single cultural unit, where the shared common written language was Chinese and Confucianism and Taoism were the common metaphysical traditions, was to build one political unit. When the notion of a geographical unit of Asia was replaced by the concept of Asia as a cultural and political unit, a massive growth of interest and discourse were provoked around the concept of Orientalism. When Orientalism was being formulated, Korea automatically became member of "one Asia" when the country became colonized. For Koreans, the identity of the Orient had to be defined in cultural terms, as the political notion of a nation was non-existent at that time. The definition of identity was pursued at two levels, pan-Asian and local. If Orientalism was an elite discourse centered in pan-Asian philosophical and religious tradition, localized Orientalism was a popular discourse emphasizing locality as the byproduct of natural geographic condition. After the liberation in 1945 from colonial rule, a thrust of movement arose towards political nationalism. Two types of discourses on Orientalism, elite and popular, continued as central themes in art. Despite the effort to redefine the national identity by eradicating the cultural language of the colonial past, the past was enduring well into the present time. As discussed above, even when the painting themes were selected from Korean history, the tradition of using history painting as a manifestation of political policy to glorify the local identity had its founding during the Meiji period. The elevation of folk art to the level of high art also goes back to the colonial promotion of local color and local sentiment. Again, the succession of the past (colonial) ideal was defended as the tradition assumed a distinct modern shape that was abstract in style. The concept of the "Orient" is of relative and changing nature. It was formulated in relation to Western culture or civilization. Whatever the real motive of the adoption of them had been, the superiority of the Orient was emphasized at all times. The essence of the Orient was always perceived as the metaphysical tradition as a way to downgrade Western culture as materialistic. This view still prevails and the principle of Orient was always sought in Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism. Even when Orientalism was employed by imperialist Japan in an effort to establish her position as the center of the Orient, the spiritual source was still in Chinese philosophy and religion. In art also, the Chinese literati tradition became the major platform for elite discourse. Orientalism was also defined locally, and the so-called local color was pursued in terms of theme and style. Thus trend continued despite the effort to eradicate the remnants of colonial culture long after liberation. These efforts are now being supported politically and also institutionalized to become the aesthetic ideal of the modern Korean art.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.179-188
• /
• 2020

단게 겐조는 현대건축의 창작 과정에서 전통을 어떻게 표현할 것인가에 관심을 가졌고, 일본건축의 전통성을 자신만의 방식으로 현대건축에 표현하려고 노력하였다. 특히, 단게는 자신이 주장했던 '신(新)전통'의 관점에서 전통을 건축재료나 구성요소적 측면에서 표현하였다. 단게는 건축재료와 구성요소 등에서 일본 전통건축의 조형을 서양의 기술과 조화시킴으로써 국제 건축계의 담론과 상응하면서도 서양의 것과는 구별되도록 전통건축에 근간을 둔 '일본적인 건축양식'을 창조하였다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 단게가 건축에 사용한 건축재료와 구성요소에서의 전통의 표시나 흔적을 찾아 분석하는 것을 목표로 했다. 이와 같은 연구를 통해 서구의 문명을 거의 비슷한 시기에 받아들였음에도 불구하고, 그것을 소화하여 전통건축과 접목하는 데는 일본과 매우 다른 과정과 결과를 가졌던 우리 건축계에 시사점을 갖고자 한다.