• 제목/요약/키워드: delayed write

검색결과 12건 처리시간 0.017초

싱글홈드 환경에서 패킷 손실을 고려한 SCTP와 TCP의 평균 전송 시간 (Mean Transfer Time for SCTP and TCP in Single-homed Environment considering Packet Loss)

  • 김주현;이용진
    • 대한공업교육학회지
    • /
    • 제33권1호
    • /
    • pp.233-248
    • /
    • 2008
  • 새롭게 제안된 전송 계층 프로토콜인 SCTP(Stream Control Transmission Protocol)는 두 개 이상의 IP 주소를 갖는 멀티호밍(multi-homing) 환경에서 기존의 TCP(Transmission Control Protocol)보다 성능이 향상되는 것으로 알려져 있다. 하지만 현재 주로 사용되고 있는 컴퓨터는 한 개의 IP 주소를 갖는 싱글홈드(single-homed) 환경이다. 본 연구에서는 패킷 손실이 있는 싱글홈드 환경에서, SCTP의 평균 전송 시간이 TCP의 그것보다 우수한 가를 알아보기 위해, 대역폭, 지연 시간 및 패킷 손실률을 라우터에서 조절하는 실제 테스트베드 환경을 구축하여 실험하였다. SCTP와 TCP의 평균 전송 시간을 측정하기 위해 C 언어를 이용하여 서버 및 클라이언트 애플리케이션을 작성하였다. 실험 결과, 싱글홈드 환경에서 SCTP는 TCP 보다 전송 시간이 짧을 때도 있었지만, 대부분의 경우에 있어서 TCP의 전송 시간이 SCTP 보다 짧았다. 그 이유는 SCTP가 TCP에 비해 전송 중 타임아웃으로 인해 전송이 멈추거나, SACK의 폭주로 인해 데이터 전송이 지연되는 경우가 발생하기 때문인 것으로 확인되었다. 본 연구의 결과는 현재 구현된 SCTP 모듈을 사용하거나 또는 새로운 SCTP 모듈을 개발하는 데 있어서 정교한 성능 튜닝이 필요함을 보여주고 있다.

가습기살균제 참사의 진행과 교훈(Q&A) (Questions and Answers about the Humidifier Disinfectant Disaster as of February 2017)

  • 최예용
    • 한국환경보건학회지
    • /
    • 제43권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-22
    • /
    • 2017
  • 'The worstest environment disaster', 'World's first biocide massacre', 'Home-based Sewol ferry disaster' are all phrases attached to the recent humidifier disinfectant disaster. In the spring of 2011, four of 8 pregnant women including 1 adult man passed away at a university hospital in Seoul due to breathing failure. Epidemiologic investigation conducted by the Korean CDC soon revealed the inhalation of humidifier disinfectant, which had been widely used in Korea during the winter, to be responsible for the disease. As well as lung fibrosis hardening of the lungs, other diseases including asthma, rhinitis, skin disease, liver disease, fetal disease or cancers have been researched for their relation with exposure to the products. By February 9, 2017, 5,342 cases had registered for health problems and 1,131 of them were already dead (20.8% mortality rate). Based on studies by government agencies and a telephone survey of the general population by Seoul National University and civic groups, around 20% of the general public of Korea has used these products. Since the market release of the first product by SK Chemical in 1994, over 7.1 million items from around 20 brands were sold up to 2011. Most of the products were manufactured by well-known large conglomerates such as SK, Lotte, Samsung, Shinsegye, LG, and GS, as well as some European companies including UK-based Reckitt Benckiser and TESCO, the German firm Henkel, the Danish firm KeTox, and an Irish company. Even though this disaster was unveiled in 2011 by the Korean government, the issue of the victims was neglected for over five years. In 2016, an unexpected but intensive investigation by prosecutors found that Reckitt Benckiser manipulated and concealed animal tests for its own brand and brought several university experts and company employees to court. The matter was an intense social issue in Korea from May to June with a surge in media coverage. The prosecutor's investigation and a nationwide boycott campaign organized by victims and environmental groups against Reckitt Benckiser, whose product had been used by more than 70% of victims, led to the producer's official apology and a compensation scheme. A legislative investigation organized after the April 2016 national election revealed the producers' faults and the government's responsibility, but failed to meet expectations. A special law for the victims passed the National Assembly in January 2017 and a punitive system together with a massive environmental epidemiology investigation are expected to be the only solutions for this tragedy. Sciences of medicine, toxicology and environmental health have provided decisive evidence so far, but for the remaining problems the perspectives of social sciences such as sociology and jurisprudence are highly necessary, similar to with the Minamata disease and Wonjin Rayon events. It may not be easy to follow this issue using unfamiliar terminology from medical and chemical science and the long, complicated history of the event. For these reasons the author has attempted to write this article in a question and answer format to render it easier to follow. The 17 questions are: Q1 What is humidifier disinfectant? Q2 What kind of health problems are caused by humidifier disinfectant? Q3 How many victims are there? Q4 What is the analysis of the 1,112 cases of death? Q5 What is the problem with the government's diagnostic criteria and the solution? Q6 Who made what brands? Q7 Has there been a recall? What is still on sale? Q8 Was safety not checked by any producers? Q9 What are the government's responsibilities? Q10 Is it true that these products were sold only in Korea? Q11 Why and how was it unveiled only in 2011 after 17 years of sales? Q12 What delayed the resolution of the victim issue? Q13 What is the background of the prosecutor's investigation in early 2016? Q14 Is it possible to report new victim cases without evidence of product purchase? Q15 What is happening with the victim issue? Q16 How does it compare with the cases of Minamata disease and Wonjin Rayon? Q17 Are there prevention measures and lessons?