• Title/Summary/Keyword: defamilialization

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

Korean Long-Term Care Insurance System and Caring Justice (노인장기요양보험제도와 돌봄 정의)

  • Choi, Hee Kyung
    • 한국사회정책
    • /
    • v.25 no.3
    • /
    • pp.103-130
    • /
    • 2018
  • The study aims to analyse Korean Long-Term Care Insurance system in terms of caring justice on the premise that elder care should be included in discussions and policies of care. Caring justice means an ideal of equal sharing duties and rights of care by all citizens. Four dimensions of caring justice(decommodification, defamilialization, degenderization and elderly participation and power) were established for the analysis. The results of the analysis were presented that Korean Long-Term Care Insurance system was maintained by commodificated and gendered care services attempting defamilialization with the exclusion of elderly beneficiaries, which represented typical caring injustice. Policy suggestions were made to realize caring justice: improving the status of caring labour by achieving proper service price and public employment, reorganization of life cycle based caring system integrating children, disabled adults and elders, and developing user-centered long-term care system to guarantee participation and choice of people in caring relationships.

Familialism And Typology of Family Policies (가족주의와 가족정책 재유형화를 위한 이론적 논의)

  • Yoon, Hong Sik
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare
    • /
    • v.64 no.4
    • /
    • pp.261-284
    • /
    • 2012
  • This article attempts to discuss the childcare regime through examining the way familialism is expressed in society. First of all, this study reconceptualizes familialism and familism. From this conceptualization, this paper argues that although familialism is partly related with the level of development in a welfare state, familialism determines the way of welfare provision. Especially, family policy models are classified into 6 different typologies based on four concepts: defamilialization, familialization, public, and private. According to this discussion, familialism in child care is not simply the result of underdeveloped welfare in Korea. Rather the familialism is deeply rooted in the current socioeconomic circumstance and traditional culture in Korea. This implies that despite of expanding the institutional infrastructure of public childcare, the characteristic of Korean childcare regime would not be the same as the Nordic childcare regime.

  • PDF