• 제목/요약/키워드: curricular alignment

검색결과 3건 처리시간 0.015초

평가와 교육과정 및 교수방법의 일관성에 관한 연구: 연구의 종합 (A Study on Alignment of Assessment with Curriculum and Instruction in Mathematics Education : A Synthesis of Research)

  • Oh Young Youl
    • 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
    • /
    • 제13권2호
    • /
    • pp.107-122
    • /
    • 2003
  • 본 연구는 최근 수하 교육 개혁 운동에서 중요한 이슈가 되고 있는 교육 과정, 교육 방법, 그리고 평가 사이의 상호 일관성(alignment)의 필요성을 이론적으로 고찰하는데 그 목적이 있다. 특히, 최근의 수학 교육의 흐름에 비추어서 교실 환경에서의 평가와 국가 수준의 평가의 시각에서 교육 과정과 교육 방법과의 일관성에 대해 논의하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 학생들의 수학 학습에 대한 평가는 다양한 방법을 활용하여 수업과 통합적으로 이루어져야 한다는 것을 말해주고 있다. 특히, CGI와 QUASAR에서 적용된 평가 모델은 평가가 어떻게 교육 과정 및 교육 방법과 일관성을 이루면서 효율적으로 이루어질 수 있는지를 보며준다. 국가수준의 평가에 대한 연구 결과는 과거에 사용된 대다수의 이러한 종류의 평가들이 표준화 검사를 적용함으로써 많은 문제점들을 내포하고 있었음을 지적차고 있다. 특히, 평가 문항과 교육 내용 및 교육 방법과의 불일치성의 예들은 국가수준의 평가의 타당성 및 그 환용에 대해 받은 우려를 포함하고 있으며 표준화 검사는 그 대표적인 예라고 할 수 있다. 결론적으로, 수학교육 개혁의 핵심 과제인 수업 관행의 질적 개선을 위해서는 평가의 효율적인 활용이 필수적이라고 판단되며 이를 위해서는 평가와 교육과정 및 교육 방법과의 일관성은 그 전제조건이라고 할 수 있을 것이다.

  • PDF

초등 과학과 교육과정과 교사용지도서 목표 간의 비교 분석 - 2009 개정 교육과정 3~4학년을 중심으로 - (Analysis of the Alignment between Elementary Science Curriculum and Teacher Guidebook - Examining Learning Objectives in 2009 Grade 3~4 Science Curriculum -)

  • 나지연;윤혜경;김미정
    • 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
    • /
    • 제34권2호
    • /
    • pp.183-193
    • /
    • 2015
  • Teacher guidebooks are practical and commonly used resources for teachers to deliver the goals and contents of science curriculum in classroom teaching. Thus, the alignment of teacher guidebooks and science curriculum could be critical to undertake the effectiveness of curriculum implication in science classrooms. This study is to investigate how the learning objectives of science curriculum are implicated in teacher guidebooks by analyzing the dimensions of knowledge and cognitive process in learning objectives in both documents. Grade 3~4 learning objectives (82 objectives in the curriculum, 459 in the teacher guidebook, 541 in total) in 2009 Revised science curriculum and teacher guidebooks were coded and analyzed based on the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. The analysis focused on how the knowledge dimensions and cognitive processes of the curriculum were emphasized and restructured in the teacher guidebooks to examine the coalition between the two important documents. The study found: 1) the learning objectives in Grade 3~4 in both documents were skewed to certain knowledge dimension (conceptual) and cognitive process (understand); 2) there was a high coalition between unit objectives and lesson objectives in the teacher guidebooks, however, relatively low coalition between the curriculum and the teacher guidebooks; and 3) learning objectives in the curriculum were delivered in teacher guidebooks in various patterns (similar, detailed, additional, in portion, and the same), and 'detailed' and 'additional' were frequently shown. There also appeared new objectives in the teacher guidebooks, which were not present in the curriculum. The findings in this study could provide some suggestions to the current project of developing 2015 Science Curriculum in regard to understanding the dimensions of knowledge and cognitive process of learning objectives and their alignments with textbooks and teacher guidebooks.

Exploring Alignments among International Baccalaureate, Next Generation Science Standards, and the 2015 Science Curriculum of Korea, Focusing on Elementary Science

  • Shin, Myeong-Kyeong;Kim, Eun-Jeong
    • 한국지구과학회지
    • /
    • 제42권4호
    • /
    • pp.470-475
    • /
    • 2021
  • This study aimed to explore alignments among three curricula based on the contents of the university level curriculum. The 2015 revised curriculum, International Baccalaureate(IB), and Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS) were selected for this study, and a college textbook was analyzed to compare the curricula. As the age groups studying the curricular were different, we reorganized them according to school ages prior to conducting the study. The results of the analysis were: first, the contents of the 2015 revised curriculum did not sufficiently elaborate on the natural hazards related to humans, unlike the university level, IB PYP, and NGSS curricula. Third, there are different ways of introducing scientific vocabulary curricula, meaning that the number of scientific vocabularies in the 2015 revised curriculum was less than that in the IB, PYP, and NGSS.