• 제목/요약/키워드: curing shrinkage

검색결과 292건 처리시간 0.025초

C-factor와 충전법이 복합레진의 중합 수축에 의한 치질에서의 수축 응력에 미치는 영향 (EFFECT OF C-FACTOR AND LAYERING TECHNIQUE ON THE CONTRACTION FORCE OF COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATION TO TOOTH SURFACE)

  • 이봉규;이난영;이상호
    • 대한소아치과학회지
    • /
    • 제33권2호
    • /
    • pp.233-243
    • /
    • 2006
  • 와동 형성시 C-factor와 충전방법이 복합레진 수복물에서의 수축 응력에 미치는 영향을 평가하고자 발거된 소구치를 대상으로 C-factor가 3.6과 1.0인 와동을 각각 형성한 후 hybrid형 복합레진인 $Z-250^{TM}$(3M ESPE U.S.A.)과 flowable형 복합레진인 $Filtek\;flow^{TM}$(3M ESPE U.S.A.)를 사용하여 layering을 시행하고 광중합하면서 strain gauge법을 이용하여 치질에서의 수축 응력을 측정하였다. 시편을 절단하여 레진과 상아질 사이 계면의 접착상태를 주사전자현미경으로 관찰한 결과 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. C-factor에 따른 수축 응력을 측정한 결과 C-factor가 3.7인 제 1군과 제 2군 그리고 제 5군이 900초 후 각각 0.11, 0.07, 0.07 MPa로 C-factor가 1.0인 제 3군과 제 4군의 0.05와 0.04 MPa에 비해 크게 나타났다(P<0.05). 1,800초 후에는 제 1군, 제 5군, 제 2군, 제 3군, 제 4순으로 크게 나타났으나 제 2군과 제 3군 그리고 제 3군과 제 4군 사이에는 유의성이 없었다. 2. 재료에 따른 수축 응력의 차이는 C-factor가 3.7인 와동의 경우 hybrid형 레진인 Filtek $Z-250^{TM}$이 flowable 레진인 $Filtek\;flow^{TM}$에 비해 수축 응력이 크게 나타났으나(P<0.05), C-factor가 1.0인 와동의 경우 재료의 차이에 따른 수축응력의 유의한 차이가 없었다. 3. Layering에 따른 수축 응력은 Filtek $Z-250^{TM}$을 layering 없이 bulk 충전한 제 1군에 비해 flowable 레진을 layering한 제 5군이 전 측정 시간대에 걸쳐 수축 응력이 유의하게 낮게 나타났다(P<0.05). 4. C-factor가 3.7인 제 1군과 제 2군 제 5군은 900초까지 수축 응력이 증가하다 이후 점차 감소하는 경향을 보였다. 5. C-factor가 1.0인 와동의 경우 충전용 레진 종류에 관계없이 레진과 와동벽 사이에 긴밀한 접착 상태를 보였으나 C-factor가 3.7인 와동의 경우 부분적으로 틈이 관찰되었다. 전반적으로 와동저에 비해 와동벽에서 틈이 더 많이 관찰되었다. 이상의 결과를 종합하여 보면 복합레진 수복시 수축응력에 따른 합병증을 예방하기 위해 C-factor를 크지 않게 와동을 설계, 형성하여야 하며 C-factor가 클 경우 flowable 레진을 이장하는 등 재료적인 면에서의 선택과 적용법이 중요할 것으로 사료된다.

  • PDF

에폭시 수지 모르터의 특성에 관한 실험적 연구 (Experimental Studies on the Properties of Epoxy Resin Mortars)

  • 연규석;강신업
    • 한국농공학회지
    • /
    • 제26권1호
    • /
    • pp.52-72
    • /
    • 1984
  • This study was performed to obtain the basic data which can be applied to the use of epoxy resin mortars. The data was based on the properties of epoxy resin mortars depending upon various mixing ratios to compare those of cement mortar. The resin which was used at this experiment was Epi-Bis type epoxy resin which is extensively being used as concrete structures. In the case of epoxy resin mortar, mixing ratios of resin to fine aggregate were 1: 2, 1: 4, 1: 6, 1: 8, 1:10, 1 :12 and 1:14, but the ratio of cement to fine aggregate in cement mortar was 1 : 2.5. The results obtained are summarized as follows; 1.When the mixing ratio was 1: 6, the highest density was 2.01 g/cm$^3$, being lower than 2.13 g/cm$^3$ of that of cement mortar. 2.According to the water absorption and water permeability test, the watertightness was shown very high at the mixing ratios of 1: 2, 1: 4 and 1: 6. But then the mixing ratio was less than 1 : 6, the watertightness considerably decreased. By this result, it was regarded that optimum mixing ratio of epoxy resin mortar for watertight structures should be richer mixing ratio than 1: 6. 3.The hardening shrinkage was large as the mixing ratio became leaner, but the values were remarkably small as compared with cement mortar. And the influence of dryness and moisture was exerted little at richer mixing ratio than 1: 6, but its effect was obvious at the lean mixing ratio, 1: 8, 1:10,1:12 and 1:14. It was confirmed that the optimum mixing ratio for concrete structures which would be influenced by the repeated dryness and moisture should be rich mixing ratio higher than 1: 6. 4.The compressive, bending and splitting tensile strenghs were observed very high, even the value at the mixing ratio of 1:14 was higher than that of cement mortar. It showed that epoxy resin mortar especially was to have high strength in bending and splitting tensile strength. Also, the initial strength within 24 hours gave rise to high value. Thus it was clear that epoxy resin was rapid hardening material. The multiple regression equations of strength were computed depending on a function of mixing ratios and curing times. 5.The elastic moduli derived from the compressive stress-strain curve were slightly smaller than the value of cement mortar, and the toughness of epoxy resin mortar was larger than that of cement mortar. 6.The impact resistance was strong compared with cement mortar at all mixing ratios. Especially, bending impact strength by the square pillar specimens was higher than the impact resistance of flat specimens or cylinderic specimens. 7.The Brinell hardness was relatively larger than that of cement mortar, but it gradually decreased with the decline of mixing ratio, and Brinell hardness at mixing ratio of 1 :14 was much the same as cement mortar. 8.The abrasion rate of epoxy resin mortar at all mixing ratio, when Losangeles abation testing machine revolved 500 times, was very low. Even mixing ratio of 1 :14 was no more than 31.41%, which was less than critical abrasion rate 40% of coarse aggregate for cement concrete. Consequently, the abrasion rate of epoxy resin mortar was superior to cement mortar, and the relation between abrasion rate and Brinell hardness was highly significant as exponential curve. 9.The highest bond strength of epoxy resin mortar was 12.9 kg/cm$^2$ at the mixing ratio of 1:2. The failure of bonded flat steel specimens occurred on the part of epoxy resin mortar at the mixing ratio of 1: 2 and 1: 4, and that of bonded cement concrete specimens was fond on the part of combained concrete at the mixing ratio of 1 : 2 ,1: 4 and 1: 6. It was confirmed that the optimum mixing ratio for bonding of steel plate, and of cement concrete should be rich mixing ratio above 1 : 4 and 1 : 6 respectively. 10.The variations of color tone by heating began to take place at about 60˚C, and the ultimate change occurred at 120˚C. The compressive, bending and splitting tensile strengths increased with rising temperature up to 80˚ C, but these rapidly decreased when temperature was above 800 C. Accordingly, it was evident that the resistance temperature of epoxy resin mortar was about 80˚C which was generally considered lower than that of the other concrete materials. But it is likely that there is no problem in epoxy resin mortar when used for unnecessary materials of high temperature resistance. The multiple regression equations of strength were computed depending on a function of mixing ratios and heating temperatures. 11.The susceptibility to chemical attack of cement mortar was easily affected by inorganic and organic acid. and that of epoxy resin mortar with mixing ratio of 1: 4 was of great resistance. On the other hand, when mixing ratio was lower than 1 : 8 epoxy resin mortar had very poor resistance, especially being poor resistant to organicacid. Therefore, for the structures requiring chemical resistance optimum mixing of epoxy resin mortar should be rich mixing ratio higher than 1: 4.

  • PDF