• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.23-56
• /
• 2004

The offshore trawl fishery is seeking its survival way to overcome current management conditions in red, resulted from the bilateral agreement with China and Japan. However, this movement magnifies conflicts between fisheries on the contrary and it is thought to be impossible to get over current situations. For all that, this study is aimed at investigating how this current situations have occurred. The management freedom as response to the change in fishing conditions of a certain fishery, in case of Korea, is affected by institutional regulations. The example of this is controls on fishing gears, fishing vessels, and fishing grounds. The most exposure of this control is a segmentation of institutional fisheries. The initial segmentation of the offshore trawl fishery in Korea was occurred in the period of Japan's colonization when the degree of use of fishing grounds was limited geographically. At that time, fisheries were divided by fishing areas, but it did not divide the fishery itself. The large - sized fishing vessels were developed politically to be more competative to Japanese fishing vessels since 1950s. During this time, the trawl fishery was merged into current Eastern trawl fishery and South - Western trawl fishery. It was also inevitable to divide into the pair trawl and single trawl fishery as a result of the physical mergency between Western trawl and Southern trawl fishery. In order to develop the trawl fishery, new licenses were issued on the shrimp trawl fishery, through which it was expected to boost the trawl fishery. As opposed, the shrimp trawl fishery was changed into the mid - sized trawl fishery, targeting on the eastern fishing areas and the large - sized trawl fishery was developed since the late of 1970s with the development of filefish processing industry. The large trawl fishery that led in development of offshore trawl fishery since the late of 1950s was started to divide into a pair trawl and single trawl according to the fishing method and capital power. It finally became an institutionally independent fishery in 1980s, respectively. Looking into these historical process, the segmentation of the trawl fishery is thought as a result of the lack of long - term perspective and as a production of trial and error resulted by unprepared policy. As a result, these segmentation of fisheries roles as critical obstacles in harmonization of fisheries and in overcoming of current situations. Therefore, the review of this institutional segmentation of the offshore trawl fishery should be taken for an optimal redistribution of fishing grounds suits with business and fishing technology. For this, the fishery must be divided into large capitalized fishery and small - mid fishery with consideration of capital, fishing method, and the condition of use of fishing grounds. In addition to this, by limiting outline of fishing ground that the large fishery can harvest, it must allow for the small - mid fishery to catch with its own boundary. Furthermore, by launching buyback programs on the trawl, eastern trawl, pair trawl, it can provide broader fishing grounds where the fishery can harvest with management freedom.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2001년도 학술대회지
• /
• pp.23-30
• /
• 2001

건설산업에 있어서 고유한 재무적 특성상 필연적인 차입구조에 따른 금융비용의 부담은 날로 증가되고 있고, 금융비용의 합리화는 수주전략과 함께 건설기업의 경영에 있어 가장 중요한 경영관리영역 중 하나가 되어 가고 있다. 이와 같은 배경에서 연구의 범위는 계약범위 외적 사안의 발생과 관련하여 계약상대자가 추가로 투입하는 비용에 수반하는 원가적 금융비용의 발생환경으로 한정하고, 연구의 목적은 원가적 금융비용의 배상구조에 관한 개선방안을 도출함에 있다. 연구의 방법과 절차는 국내외 연구동향의 탐색, 금융비용의 배상타당성과 인식도 조사를 위한 설문 및 사례조사의 실시, 금융비용이 건설기업의 경영에 미치는 영향의 분석, 현행 회계처리기준과 국가계약법령상의 관련문제점을 분석 · 개선방안을 제시하는 순서로 한다. 위와 같은 원가적 금융비용의 배상에 관한 연구결과로서 얻어진 결론은 다음과 같다. (1) 건설업회계처리준칙의 금융비용회계계정을 보완토록 한다. (2) 계약일방의 비용부담을 담보시키는 계약제도를 점진적으로 폐지하거나 배상규정을 보완하여야 한다. (3) 국가계약법 금융비용의 배상규정상 불합리한 내용을 합리화시켜야 한다. (4) 중요공정 관리기법(CPM)의 활용을 활성화시키고 EVMS와 연동관리함으로써 사안과 금융비용의 산정을 개관화시킬 수 있도록 한다. (5) 건설계약법체계를 제조업중심으로 제정된 현행 계약법체계로부터 분리운용토록 하여야 한다.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제10권5호
• /
• pp.7-17
• /
• 2012

2014년도 12월말부터 시행하는 한국연구재단의 등재지 제도의 폐지는 한국 내에 존재하는 연구논문집 향방에 커다란 지각변동의 요인으로 작용할 것으로 예상되고 있다. 이러한 상황은 한국유통과학회에서 발행하는 유통과학연구를 비롯한 3개의 연구논문집에게는 커다란 기회로 작용할 것이며, 이번 기회를 잘 활용한다면 조속한 성장과 발전을 도모할 수 있을 것이다. 한국유통과학회에서 발행하는 유통과학연구는 1999년을 시작으로 꾸준한 발전을 유지하여 왔고, 초창기 연 2회 발행하던 체제를 개편하여, 연 4회를 발행 하다가, 2012년에는 연 12회 발행하는 사회과학분야에서 가장 선두로 나가는 연구논문집으로 성장했다. 2011년 7월에는 전면 영문으로 홈페이지를 개편하여, 지속적으로 게재논문을 무료로 열람토록 하였고, 그 결과 2012년 들어서서 해외에서 접속하여 유통과학연구 홈페이지를 열람하는 이용자의 숫자가 급속히 증가하였다. 더욱이 최근 들어서서는 해외석학들의 논문 투고가 꾸준한 증가 추세에 있다. 예를 들어서, 2012년 3월에는 종전과 달리 해외석학들의 투고논문이 4편에 이를 정도로 학회의 지명도가 높아지고 있다. 이러한 상황은 본 유통과학연구가 한국내에서의 지명도보다 외국에서의 지명도가 높아지고 있다는 점을 의미하는 것이다. 그러나, 현시점에서 반추할 때, 이러한 발전은 현재로서는 긍정적인 요인으로 작용될 수는 있으나, 학회운영및 연구논문집의 지속적인 상태점검과 특성에 맞는 전략도출 및 실행이 없는 한 미래의 경쟁력을 기약할 수 없는 불투명한 환경에 처해 있다는 점을 인지해야 한다. 따라서, 본 연구의 목적은 한국유통과학회에서 발행하는 유통과학연구가 국내외 위상을 높이고 해외에서 유명저널이 되기 위해서는 당면과제와 문제점을 찾아내고 효율적이고 실용적인 여러가지 해결 대안을 모색 제시하고자 함에 있다. 즉, 본 연구는 한국유통과학회의 연구논문집인 유통과학연구의 과거, 현재, 그리고 미래에 대하여 논하고, 학회운영과 관련하여 편집관리 및 시스템운영을 전반적으로 점검하여 문제점과 해결점을 모색하고 제시하였다.

• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제4호
• /
• pp.145-180
• /
• 2006

In Korea, nation and nationalism are undeniable justice, absolute virtue and moreover system of desire. From the late Chosun Dynasty when the Korean Peninsula had to survive from the critical situation of being the arena of competition, and through the colonial period under Japanese imperialism, nationalism became stronger as a logic of survival. The policy of seclusion under closed and exclusive nationalism that didn't recognize the world situation well enough, eventually gave more pain to the nation. Nationalism in colonial Korea which was as reformed nationalism and on the other hand, as intransigent, resisting nationalism. Since the purpose of this writing is not for clarifying the argument raised on Korean nationalism, there is no use mentioning how it went with the change of time. But we have to focus on the fact that the word 'nation' which appeared under the influence of popular revolution and capitalism meaning 'a group of people', was translated and understood as a racial concept for strengthening the unity of 'single-race nation with five thousand years' history. First of all, there is nationalism used to fortify the system. 'The Charter of National Education' and 'The Pledge of Allegiance' were ornaments to intensify the ruling ideology and dictatorship to militarize entire South Korea for 'settling Korean democracy' professed nationalism. Also, another ruling ideology armed with 'self-reliance' put North Korea into the state of hypnosis called nationalism. Nationalism, claiming 'nation' outwardly, but in reality, being an illuminating, instructing ideology isolating each other was indeed a body with two faces. This made 'nation' in Korea mysterious and objective through work such as. The statue commemorating patriotic forefathers' and picture of national records' in South Korea art. Nationalism used to strengthening the system encountered the magical 'single-race' and made 'ghost' being an extreme exclusion to other nations. We can find pedigreed pureness not allowing any mixed breeds from the attitude accepting western art -via Japan or directly- and making it vague by using the word Korean and Asia. There's nationalism as a resistant ideology to solidify the system on the other side. It came out as a way of survival among the Great Power and grew with the task of national liberation to became as a powerful force facing against the dictatorship dominating South Korea after the liberation. This discussion of nationalism as a resistance ideology was active in 1980s. In 1980, democracy movement against the dictatorship of 5th Republic originated from military power which came out suppressing the democratic movement in Gwangju, spread out from the intellects and the students to the labors, farmers and the civilians. It is well known that the 'Nation-People(Minjoong)'s Art Movement could come out under this social condition. Our attitude toward nationalism is still dual in this opening part of 21st century. On one hand, they are opposing to the ultra-nationalism but are not able to separate it from nationalism, and on the other, they have much confusion using it. In fact, in a single-race nation like Korea, the situation of being nationalism and jus sanguinis together can cause dual nationalism. Though nationalism is included in the globalization order, it is evidence that it's effective in Korea where there are still modern fetters like division and separation. In particular, in the world where Japan makes East Asia Coalition but exposed in front of nationalism, and China not being free from Sinocentrism, and American nationalism taking the world order, and Russia fortifying nationalism suppressing the minority race after the dissolution of socialism, Korean nationalism is at the point to find an alternative plan superior to the ruling and resisting ideology.