• Title/Summary/Keyword: cost evaluation of public organization

Search Result 13, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

Factors Affecting Responsibility Accounting at Public Universities: Evidence from Vietnam

  • NGUYEN, Ngoc Tien
    • The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
    • /
    • v.7 no.4
    • /
    • pp.275-286
    • /
    • 2020
  • The study explores factors that affect the performance of responsibility accounting at public universities in Vietnam. The study conducted a survey of 130, out of 154 public universities in Vietnam and uses regression analysis methods. The results identify eight groups of factors affecting the performance of responsibility accounting at these establishments of higher education: Division of the organization into responsibility centers, Estimation and Reality, Cost and income allocation, University autonomy, Management decentralization, Estimation, Reward, and Report. Costs and income allocation for responsibility centers, university autonomy, and the division of universities into responsibility centers are shown to significantly affect the performance of public universities in Vietnam. The results show that the performance of responsibility accounting at public universities in Vietnam is influenced by decentralization of management, division of the organization into responsibility centers, reward, cost and income allocation, estimation, evaluation of the results achieved between the estimation compared with reality, release of reports and university autonomy. Among the factors, cost and income allocation, university autonomy, division of the organization into responsibility centers, reward and evaluation of results achieved between estimation and reality have strong impacts. The study findings also indicate that the school council does not affect responsibility accounting at these universities.

The Study of Rationality for Public Organizations' Cost Allocation Method (공공기관의 운영합리화를 위한 원가산정 방안에 대한 연구 -별정우체국을 중심으로-)

  • Park, Sung-Jong;Han, Kyung-Il
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.10 no.8
    • /
    • pp.91-96
    • /
    • 2012
  • The purpose of this study is to examine the rationality for public organizations' cost allocation method through the case of special post offices. The proper use of allocation method is crucial to promote and nurture the public organization sector. On that note, this paper presents how to apply the proper estimation method. The cost allocation method is to split the total expense into appropriate services and departments. Using the basic expense rate and the standard depreciation rate and area at each post office, the total cost is calculated into the cost per person and area. As a result, the correct cost can be assigned through allocation per according service unit.

Development of a Ranking Model of Evaluation Indexes in Public Works (정보계측기법을 응용한 공공시설의 평가지표 중요도 산정 모델의 개발)

  • Na, Joon-Yeup;Jung, Nam-Su;Lee, Jeong-Jae
    • Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers
    • /
    • v.47 no.2
    • /
    • pp.25-32
    • /
    • 2005
  • In evaluation of public works, its components related with benefit and cost in feasibility analysis can be classified to quantative and qualitative elements, To evaluate qualitative components which can not be calculated by numerical value, several methods are used to assess relative importance. AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is representative method which can evaluate importance, but it has difficulties in organization of expert group, execution of question, and subjective decision of questioner. Information measure technique can be used to evaluate these qualitative importance of environmental and social components in public works planning. In result of comparing importances of AHP and information measure technique, it has statistical significance in of road project.

Position Value for Relative Comparison of Healthcare Status of Korea in 2017 (2017년 한국 보건의료의 상대적 위치와 추이: 경제협력개발기구 국가와 비교)

  • Lee, Hyeon Ji;Oh, Sarah Soyeon;Park, Eun-Cheol
    • Health Policy and Management
    • /
    • v.30 no.1
    • /
    • pp.131-138
    • /
    • 2020
  • The purpose of this study was to compare the health status of South Korea with those of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries and examine the trends. Position vAlue for Relative Comparison (PARC) was used as a gauge for comparison, and five sectors of the health care system were measured: demand, supply, accessibility, quality, and cost. The Mann-Kendall test was used as a statistical analysis method to examine trend of PARC values obtained from 2000 to recent years. According to the results, the demand, supply, accessibility, and quality sectors were higher than the OECD average, while the cost was lower than the average. However, there is a recent trend of sharp increases in health care costs. Some indicators: health employment, quality of primary care and mental health care were lower than the OECD average, and health determinants showed a worsening trend. Therefore, policy-makers need to take this into account and make efforts for sustainable health care.

A Study on Evaluability Assessment of the Performance Evaluation for Public Organization Focusing on Case of KEPCO (공공기관 경영평가의 평가성 검토: 한전 사례를 중심으로)

  • Yoonseuk Woo
    • Knowledge Management Research
    • /
    • v.24 no.3
    • /
    • pp.17-34
    • /
    • 2023
  • Recently, national concern for record breaking level of deficit operation of KEPCO grows bigger in Korea. With this regard, many stakeholders believe KEPCO should be responsible for this result although it is not clear whether KEPCO is only to blame who is in such position where full cost pricing is impossible and entrepreneurial efficiency is not guaranteed. Particularly, less concern is given to Performance Evaluation for Public Organization(PEPO) which did not give prior warning against major deficit of KEPCO or help to improve its capacity to deal with the problem, and thus prevented KEPCO from acknowledging its managerial weakness by crediting KEPCO with successive grade B during the period of previous government. Based on such viewpoint, this study analyzes reports of PEPO for 5 years in terms of evaluability assessment and suggests proper direction for better PEPO in the future. From this analysis, it was found that firstly, relevant suggestion was not made to prevent or improve defict problem; secondly, comments are increasing every year without consistency; thirdly, comments related to long-term investment are only recently found; fourthly, suggestions are based on political orientation rather than evidence or expertise. This study is expected to contribute to evidence-based evaluation and knowledge management since it tackles evaluation reports themselves for the first time.

A Review of Large-Scale Hydropower Project in Public Sector of Pakistan

  • Umair, Muhammad;Choudhary, Muhammad Abbas;Jahanzaib, Mirza
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management
    • /
    • v.4 no.4
    • /
    • pp.47-59
    • /
    • 2014
  • Client organization inadequate project planning before awarding the contract and insufficient monitoring and control system among the parties involved create severe problems. Ultimately, large-scale projects go beyond the expected cost and time control limits. This paper discusses the major issues involved with a large-scale Hydropower Project in Pakistan Public Sector environment. The latest approved Baseline Plan of project was reviewed and analyzed using Variance Analysis and Trend Analysis techniques in Primavera project management software to assess the efforts made of the parties involved. It was found that Project is 202% Cost overrun and 25% time delays from original contract award. After analysis of baseline plan and quantification of various variance issues in impacted activities, the questionnaire survey was conducted to identify the impact of causative factors. There were almost 17 most significant causative factors identified among 60 identified factors and responsibilities are assigned accordingly. At the end recommendations are made for strategic decisions as lessons learned during project evaluation.

An Analysis on the Expected Performance of Constructing and Operating the Integrated Computing Environment in case of Culture Informatization (문화정보화 부문의 통합전산환경 구축.운영의 기대 성과분석)

  • Jung, Hae-Yong;Kim, Sang-Hoon
    • Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
    • /
    • v.11 no.1 s.39
    • /
    • pp.203-222
    • /
    • 2006
  • This study proposes the methodology of analyzing the expected performance of the Integrated Computing Environment(ICE) on the assumption that the ICE of the agencies and the affiliated organizations under Ministry of Culture and Tourism is constructed and operated. The main objectives of the study are as follows : 1) deriving the performance criteria divided into the operational expected value and the strategic expected value of constructing and operating the ICE for Culture and Tourism informatization, 2) proposing the ways of extracting the detailed criteria for four performance areas(the degree of jnformatization efficiency, the degree of public service, the innovation and development of IS organization, the culture and tourism value creation) to evaluate the operational expected value based on the BSC(Balanced Scorecard) Perspective by using the CSF(Critical Success Factors) methodology, and 3) developing the detailed performance criteria and measures for the economic evaluation of the informatization efficiency from the TCO(Total Cost of Ownership) perspective and suggesting the practical evaluation method by applying them to the case of Culture and Tourism informatization.

  • PDF

A Study on the Evaluation of Nepal's Inclusive Business Solution: Focusing on the Application of OECD DAC Evaluation Criteria (네팔의 포용적 비즈니스 프로그램 평가에 관한 연구: 경제협력개발기구 개발원조위원회 평가기준 적용을 중심으로)

  • Kim, Yeon-Hong;Lee, Sung-Soon
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.21 no.4
    • /
    • pp.177-192
    • /
    • 2021
  • The Development Assistance Committee of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development discusses the reorganization of the five evaluation criteria of the Public Development Assistance Committee, which are used internationally, and the five evaluation criteria including adequacy, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability when assessing public development assistance in 1991. This study is to derive alternatives by applying the evaluation criteria of the Development Assistance Committee of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in the evaluation of the inclusive business program being implemented in Nepal since 2019. As a result of the study, the adequacy of Nepal's inclusive business program was consistent with continuous employment and job creation for vulnerable groups such as disabled and orphan women. Efficiency can be said to be efficient in that processes such as work order and work confirmation are made with an electronic management tool, and delivery of the result is transmitted online, saving time and cost compared to other industries. The effectiveness of this project can be said to be an effective program in that it provides high-quality jobs such as providing specialized computer graphics education for the vulnerable, such as disabled and orphan women in Nepal, and hiring graduates as employees. Sustainability is the point that KOICA's inclusive business program has enabled vulnerable groups in the existing fields of agriculture and manufacturing to engage in the computer graphics industry, and the scalability of movies, characters, education businesses, and role models in other countries.However, considering that the scale of public development assistance will continue to increase in the future, it is necessary to establish a systematic monitoring system and a recirculation system so that the project between the donor and recipient countries can continue.

Evaluating Direct Costs of Gastric Cancer Treatment in Iran - Case Study in Kerman City in 2015

  • Izadi, Azar;Sirizi, Mohammad Jaffari;Esmaeelpour, Safa;Barouni, Mohsen
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • v.17 no.6
    • /
    • pp.3007-3013
    • /
    • 2016
  • Background: Gastrointestinal cancers are common malignancies associated with high mortality rates. Healthcare systems are always faced with high costs of treatment of gastrointestinal cancers including stomach cancer. Identification and prioritization of these costs can help determine economic burden and then improve of health planning by policy-makers. This study was performed in 2015 in Kerman City aimed at estimating the direct hospital costs for patients with gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the medical records of 160 patients with stomach cancer admitted from 2011 to 2014 to Shafa Hospital were examined, the current stage of the disease and the patients' health status were identified, and the direct costs related to the type of treatment in the public and private sectors were calculated. SPSS-19 was used for statistical analysis of the data. Results: Of the patients studied, 103 (65%) were men and 57 (35%) were women. The mean age of patients was 65 years. Distribution into four stages of the disease was 5%, 20%, 30%, and 45%, respectively. Direct costs in four stages of the disease were calculated as 2191.07, 2642.93, 2877, and 2674.07 USD (63,045,879, 76,047,934, 82,783,019, and 76,943,800 IRR), respectively. The highest percentage of costs was related to surgery in Stage I and to medication in Stages II, III, and IV. According to the results of direct costs of treatment for stomach cancer in Kerman, the mean total cost of treating a patient in the public sector was estimated at 74,705,158 IRR, of which averages of 60,141,384 IRR and 14,563,774 IRR were the shares of insurance and patients, respectively. Conclusions: The high prevalence and diagnosis of disease in old age and at advanced stages of disease impose great costs on the patients and the health system. Early diagnosis through screening and selecting an appropriate treatment method might largely ameliorate the economic burden of the disease.

The Comparative Study on Performance Evaluations of Social Service Delivery Types (사회서비스 공급유형별 성과평가 비교 : 노인관련 사회서비스를 중심으로)

  • Seo, Jeong-Min;Kim, Nang-Hee
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.14 no.5
    • /
    • pp.39-46
    • /
    • 2016
  • The history of Social service is above 10 years. Owing to corresponding to the user's needs social services sector is expanding. And, to deal with them, the social delivery systems has been changed. Traditional social welfare delivery system is provided by public facilities and private facilities. On the other hand, Social Services is made up of the traditional social welfare delivery system and new delivery system which is composed of profit organizations and non-profit organizations. Considering this, Study attempted to compare the performance evaluation of supply type-profit and non-profit social service organizations. Performance evaluation method was applied to net income, except for expenditure in total revenue. Net income difference between profit organization non-profit organization was assessed by T-test. We conclude that the two population means are different at the 0.05 significance level. Looking in detail, the non-profit organizations were found to be higher than the non-profit organizations, labor costs, operating costs, facility cost and consumable costs, but part of the business expense costs, the non-profit organizations was higher than the profit organizations.