• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.63-86
• /
• 2010

Personalized services directly and indirectly acquire personal data, in part, to provide customers with higher-value services that are specifically context-relevant (such as place and time). Information technologies continue to mature and develop, providing greatly improved performance. Sensory networks and intelligent software can now obtain context data, and that is the cornerstone for providing personalized, context-specific services. Yet, the danger of overflowing personal information is increasing because the data retrieved by the sensors usually contains privacy information. Various technical characteristics of context-aware applications have more troubling implications for information privacy. In parallel with increasing use of context for service personalization, information privacy concerns have also increased such as an unrestricted availability of context information. Those privacy concerns are consistently regarded as a critical issue facing context-aware personalized service success. The entire field of information privacy is growing as an important area of research, with many new definitions and terminologies, because of a need for a better understanding of information privacy concepts. Especially, it requires that the factors of information privacy should be revised according to the characteristics of new technologies. However, previous information privacy factors of context-aware applications have at least two shortcomings. First, there has been little overview of the technology characteristics of context-aware computing. Existing studies have only focused on a small subset of the technical characteristics of context-aware computing. Therefore, there has not been a mutually exclusive set of factors that uniquely and completely describe information privacy on context-aware applications. Second, user survey has been widely used to identify factors of information privacy in most studies despite the limitation of users' knowledge and experiences about context-aware computing technology. To date, since context-aware services have not been widely deployed on a commercial scale yet, only very few people have prior experiences with context-aware personalized services. It is difficult to build users' knowledge about context-aware technology even by increasing their understanding in various ways: scenarios, pictures, flash animation, etc. Nevertheless, conducting a survey, assuming that the participants have sufficient experience or understanding about the technologies shown in the survey, may not be absolutely valid. Moreover, some surveys are based solely on simplifying and hence unrealistic assumptions (e.g., they only consider location information as a context data). A better understanding of information privacy concern in context-aware personalized services is highly needed. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to identify a generic set of factors for elemental information privacy concern in context-aware personalized services and to develop a rank-order list of information privacy concern factors. We consider overall technology characteristics to establish a mutually exclusive set of factors. A Delphi survey, a rigorous data collection method, was deployed to obtain a reliable opinion from the experts and to produce a rank-order list. It, therefore, lends itself well to obtaining a set of universal factors of information privacy concern and its priority. An international panel of researchers and practitioners who have the expertise in privacy and context-aware system fields were involved in our research. Delphi rounds formatting will faithfully follow the procedure for the Delphi study proposed by Okoli and Pawlowski. This will involve three general rounds: (1) brainstorming for important factors; (2) narrowing down the original list to the most important ones; and (3) ranking the list of important factors. For this round only, experts were treated as individuals, not panels. Adapted from Okoli and Pawlowski, we outlined the process of administrating the study. We performed three rounds. In the first and second rounds of the Delphi questionnaire, we gathered a set of exclusive factors for information privacy concern in context-aware personalized services. The respondents were asked to provide at least five main factors for the most appropriate understanding of the information privacy concern in the first round. To do so, some of the main factors found in the literature were presented to the participants. The second round of the questionnaire discussed the main factor provided in the first round, fleshed out with relevant sub-factors. Respondents were then requested to evaluate each sub factor's suitability against the corresponding main factors to determine the final sub-factors from the candidate factors. The sub-factors were found from the literature survey. Final factors selected by over 50% of experts. In the third round, a list of factors with corresponding questions was provided, and the respondents were requested to assess the importance of each main factor and its corresponding sub factors. Finally, we calculated the mean rank of each item to make a final result. While analyzing the data, we focused on group consensus rather than individual insistence. To do so, a concordance analysis, which measures the consistency of the experts' responses over successive rounds of the Delphi, was adopted during the survey process. As a result, experts reported that context data collection and high identifiable level of identical data are the most important factor in the main factors and sub factors, respectively. Additional important sub-factors included diverse types of context data collected, tracking and recording functionalities, and embedded and disappeared sensor devices. The average score of each factor is very useful for future context-aware personalized service development in the view of the information privacy. The final factors have the following differences comparing to those proposed in other studies. First, the concern factors differ from existing studies, which are based on privacy issues that may occur during the lifecycle of acquired user information. However, our study helped to clarify these sometimes vague issues by determining which privacy concern issues are viable based on specific technical characteristics in context-aware personalized services. Since a context-aware service differs in its technical characteristics compared to other services, we selected specific characteristics that had a higher potential to increase user's privacy concerns. Secondly, this study considered privacy issues in terms of service delivery and display that were almost overlooked in existing studies by introducing IPOS as the factor division. Lastly, in each factor, it correlated the level of importance with professionals' opinions as to what extent users have privacy concerns. The reason that it did not select the traditional method questionnaire at that time is that context-aware personalized service considered the absolute lack in understanding and experience of users with new technology. For understanding users' privacy concerns, professionals in the Delphi questionnaire process selected context data collection, tracking and recording, and sensory network as the most important factors among technological characteristics of context-aware personalized services. In the creation of a context-aware personalized services, this study demonstrates the importance and relevance of determining an optimal methodology, and which technologies and in what sequence are needed, to acquire what types of users' context information. Most studies focus on which services and systems should be provided and developed by utilizing context information on the supposition, along with the development of context-aware technology. However, the results in this study show that, in terms of users' privacy, it is necessary to pay greater attention to the activities that acquire context information. To inspect the results in the evaluation of sub factor, additional studies would be necessary for approaches on reducing users' privacy concerns toward technological characteristics such as highly identifiable level of identical data, diverse types of context data collected, tracking and recording functionality, embedded and disappearing sensor devices. The factor ranked the next highest level of importance after input is a context-aware service delivery that is related to output. The results show that delivery and display showing services to users in a context-aware personalized services toward the anywhere-anytime-any device concept have been regarded as even more important than in previous computing environment. Considering the concern factors to develop context aware personalized services will help to increase service success rate and hopefully user acceptance for those services. Our future work will be to adopt these factors for qualifying context aware service development projects such as u-city development projects in terms of service quality and hence user acceptance.

• Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
• /
• 제46권5호
• /
• pp.674-684
• /
• 1999

연구배경 : 특발생 폐섬유화증에서 폐암의 발생이 높다고 알려져 왔으나 실제로는 보고자마다 차이가 많고 가장 많은 조직형에 대해서도 논란이 많다. 또한 동반된 폐섬유증에 의해 폐암의 발견시기나 치료방침, 예후 등이 다를 것이 예상되나 아직 이에 대한 보고는 없는 실정이다. 본 연구는 특발성 폐섬유화증이 동반된 폐암 환자에서 위험인자, 폐암의 발생부위 및 조직학적 분포, 특히 폐암과 폐섬유화 부위의 일치도 등을 분석하여 특발성 폐섬유화증이 폐암 발생에 미친 영향을 알아보고, 특발성 폐섬유화증이 폐암의 치료에 미친 영향을 알아보고자 시행되었다. 방 법 : 서울중앙병원을 방문하였던 특발성 폐섬유화증 환자중 폐암이 동반되었던 63명($66.8{\pm}:7.8$세, 남 : 녀= 61 : 2)을 대상으로 폐암의 위치, 조직형, 폐암 진단시 폐기능 검사소견, 폐암의 치료형태, 폐암 진단 후 생존기간 등을 후향적으로 조사하였다. 또한 대조군으로 본원을 내원한 2,660명의 대조폐암환자와 조직형의 차이를 분석하였다. 결 과 : 특발성 폐섬유화증환자들 중 22.4%(63/281명)에서 폐암이 동반되었다(IPF-CA). 45명(71.4%)의 환자에서는 폐암이 동시에 발견되었고 18명(28.6%)에서는 특발성 폐섬유화증 진단 후 25.2(3.7-42.9)개월이 지나 폐암이 발견되어, 폐섬유증의 경과 도중에 폐암의 발생율은 6.7%이었다. 폐 말초부에 위치한 폐암은 35명(55.5%) 뿐 이었고, 28명(44.4%)에서는 중심부 폐암이었으며, 폐하엽 보다는 상엽에 33명(51.6%)으로 더 많았다. 전체 특발성 폐섬유화증군에 비하여 특발성 폐섬유화증에 동반된 폐암군에서 연령 ($66.8{\pm}:7.84$ vs. $63.4{\pm}:11.1$세, p=0.007), 남성 비율 (96.8 vs. 67.6%, p<0.001), 흡연력 (88.9 vs. 67.2%, p<0.001)이 의미있게 높았다. 폐섬유화 병변과 일치한 부위에 폐암이 발생한 경우는 23명(35.9%) 뿐 이었고, 40명(62.5%)은 폐섬유화 병변과 다른 부위에서 폐암이 발생하였다. 특발성 폐섬유화증에 동반된 폐암의 조직형은 편평상피암 22명(34.9%), 선암 19명(30.2%), 소세포암 12명(19.0%), 대세포암 4명(6.3%), 기타가 6명(9.5%)이었다. 2,660명의 대조폐암환자군의 조직형은 편평상피암 44.6%, 선암 34.2%, 소세포암 14.7%, 대세포암 1.5%, 기타 5.0%으로 조직형의 분포에 있어 두 군간에 유의한 차이는 없었다. 특발성 폐섬유화증의 경과 도중에 폐암이 발생한 군과 특발성 폐섬유화증과 폐암이 동시에 발견된 군간에 인적사항이나, 폐암의 위치, 조직형 및 병기 등에 유의한 차이를 관찰 할 수 없었으나 중증 섬유화증(방사선학적 소견상 폐침범 정도가 50% 이상)은 특발성 폐섬유화증 경과 도중에 폐암이 발견된 군에서 특발성 폐섬유화증과 폐암 동시 발견군에 비하여 심한 양상을 나타내었다(33.3 % vs. 61.1%, p=0.043). 폐섬유화와 일치한 부위의 폐암군은 방사선학적으로 폐섬유화가 더 광범위하게 진행된 경향을 보였고 중앙값생존기간이 폐섬유화와 다른 부위의 폐암군에 비하여 낮았다(4개월 vs. 7개월, p=0.04). 비소세포암군에서 병기 IIIa 이하인 19명중 33.3%(폐엽절제술 6명, 전폐절제술 1명)에서만 수술이 시행되었다. 10명은 수술 후 잔여 폐기량과 활동능력을 고려하여 수술을 시행하지 못하였고 2명은 수술을 거부하였다. 결 론 : 특발성 폐섬유화증에서 폐암 발생은 폐섬유화에 의한 영향보다는 연령, 흡연 및 성별(남성) 등의 위험인자와 더 연관되는 것으로 사료된다.

• Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
• /
• 제41권4호
• /
• pp.339-353
• /
• 1994

연구배경 : p53 유전자는 염색체 17p에 존재하는 종양억제유전자인데, 돌연변이가 있는 경우의 mutant protein은 그 반감기가 4~8시간으로 wild type protein의 반감기 6~20분에 비하여 현저한 증가를 보이게 된다. 결과적으로 돌연변이가 있는 경우 p53 단백질이 과축적되어 과발현이 유발되는데, 이러한 기전을 이용하여 p53 면역조직화학염색은 p53유전자의 돌연변이의 검색 방법으로 많이 이용되고 있다. 유방암에서는 p53 핵단백질의 과발현이 있는 경우에 없을 때보다 무병생존기간 및 전체 생존기간 모두에서 유의하게 나쁜 임상 경과를 취함이 보고되고 있지만 폐암에서는 p53 유전자의 돌연변이 유무, 또는 p53단백의 과발현 유무가 예후에 미치는 영향은 아직까지 확실하지 않다. 저자 등은 한국인의 폐암에서 p53 종양억제 유전자의 돌연변이 빈도를 확인하고 이들이 폐암 환자의 임상 경과에 미치는 영향을 분석하며, 면역조직화학염색 및 PCR-SSCP 분석의 감수성과 특이성을 염기서열분석과 비교하여 확인하고자 본 연구를 시행하였다. 방법 : 근치적 폐절제술 후 임상경과를 추적중인 원발성폐암환자 75예를 대상으로 하였으며, 면역조직화학검사 및 분자생물학적 연구를 위하여는 이들의 종양조직(paraffin block)을 이용하였다. p53 단백질의 면역조직화학검사를 위한 일차항체로는 DO7(Novocastra, U.K.)을 사용하였고, PCR-SSCP 및 염기서열분석 등을 위하여는 파라핀 포매조직에서 암조직을 선택적으로 박절하여 DNA를 추출하여 이용하였다. 결과: 1) 전체 75예 폐암환자의 면역조직화학염색 결과 27예(36%)에서 p53단백질의 과발현을 보였다(Table 2.3, Fig 1). 2) 전체 환자의 p53 핵단백질 과발현 여부에 따른 중앙전체생존기간은 p53 음성군과 양성군 모두 25개월, 무병생존기간은 두군 모두 13개월로 동일하였다(Fig. 2). 3) PCR-SSCP 분석에 의한 p53 유전자의 mobility shift는 시험한 58예중 16예(27.6%)에서 확인되었다(Fig 3). Mobility shift 유무에 따른 중앙전체생존기간은 shift가 있는 군과 없는 군에서 각각 27개월과 20개월, 무병생존기간은 각각 8개월, 10개월로 유의한 차이가 없었다. 4) 염기서열분석을 통한 p53 유전자의 돌연변이는 시험한 29예중 10예(34.5%)에서 확인되었다(Fig 4). 염기서열분석 결과 돌연변이 유무에 따른 중앙전체생존기간은 돌연변이가 있었던 군과 없었던 군에서 각각 27개월, 22개월이었으며, 무병생존기간은 각각 20개월과 10개월로 유의한 차이는 없었으나 돌연변이가 있는 경우 조기재발을 하는 경향을 보였다(Fig 5, 6). 5) 면역조직화학염색은 PCR-SSCP 결과를 기준으로 할 때 민감도 67.0%, 특이도 74.0%, 그리고 일치도는 62.5% 이었다. PCR-SSCP의 결과는 염기서열분석 결과를 기준으로 할 때 민감도 91.8%, 특이도 96.2%, 일치도는 95.3% 이었다. 결론 : p53 핵단백질의 과발현 정도, PCR-SSCP 및 염기서열분석상 돌연변이 유무는 비소세포폐암환자의 근치적수술후 예후의 예측지표로서는 그 효용성이 적었으나, 돌연변이가 있는 경우 조기재발을 하는 경향을 보였다. 또한 p53유전자의 돌연변이 검색법으로는 면역조직화학염색보다는 PCR-SSCP법이 우수하였다.