• 터널과지하공간
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.39-47
• /
• 1996

The results of the regression analysis and comparative study between 120 vibration events by dynamite blasting and 68 vibration events by finecker blasting which were monitored in the test blasting are as follows: The ground vibration velocity of dynamite blasting of 0.12 kg charge weight per delay at 7.4 m above the explosive is higher than that of finecker blasting of 0.96 kg charge weight per delay. In the case of 0.12 kg charge weight per delay, the ground vibration velocity of finecker blasting is equal to 5.5% of that of dynamite blasting at the 10 m distance from explosive. The decrement of ground vibration velocity of dynamite blasting of above 0.12 kg charge weight per delay is larger than that of finecker blasting of below 0.96 kg charge weight per delay. The rate of ground vibration velocity of the finecker blasting to that of dynamite blasting decreases with the distance from explosives, but increases with the decrease of charge weight per delay. The increment of ground vibration velocity of finecker blasting is less than that of dynamite blasting with the increase of charge weight per delay at the same distance from explosives. Under the condition of the constant critical ground vibration velocity or use the same charge weight per delay, the blasting working by finecker rather than by dynamite is able to be performed at the nearer place to structures.

• 화약ㆍ발파
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.3-16
• /
• 1990

The cautious blasting works had been used with emulsion explosion electric M/S delay caps. Drill depth was from 3m to 6m with Crawler Drill $\varphi{70mm}$ on the calcalious sand stone(sort-moderate-semi hard Rock). The total numbers of feet blast were 88. Scale distance were induces 15.52-60.32. It was applied to propagation Law in blasting vibration as follows. Propagtion Law in Blasting Vibration $V=K(\frac{D}{W^b})^n$ where V : Peak partical velocity(cm/sec) D : Distance between explosion and recording sites (m) W : Maximum Charge per delay-period of eighit milliseconds or more(Kg) K : Ground transmission constant, empirically determind on th Rocks, Explosive and drilling pattern ets. b : Charge exponents n : Reduced exponents Where the quantity $D/W^b$ is known as the Scale distance. Above equation is worked by the U.S Bureau of Mines to determine peak particle velocity. The propagation Law can be catagrorized in three graups. Cabic root Scaling charge per delay Square root Scaling of charge per delay Site-specific Scaling of charge per delay Charge and reduction exponents carried out by multiple regressional analysis. It's divided into under loom and over loom distance because the frequency is verified by the distance from blast site. Empirical equation of cautious blasting vibration is as follows. Over 30m----under l00m----- $V=41(D/3\sqrt{W})^{-1.41}$ -----A Over l00m-----$V= 121(D/3\sqrt{W})^{-1.66}$-----B K value on the above equation has to be more specified for furthur understang about the effect of explosives, Rock strength. And Drilling pattern on the vibration levels, it is necessary to carry out more tests.

• 기술사
• /
• 제24권6호
• /
• pp.97-105
• /
• 1991

The cautious blasting works had been used with emulsion explosion electric M/S delay caps. Drill depth was from 3m to 6m with Crawler Drill ø70mm on the calcalious sand stone (soft-moderate-semi hard Rock). The total numbers of fire blast were 88 round. Scale distance were induces 15.52-60.32. It was applied to propagation Law in blasting vibration as follows. Propagation Law in Blasting Vibration (Equation omitted) where V : Peak partical velocity(cm/sec) D : Distance between explosion and recording sites(m) W : Maximum Charge per delay-period of eighit milliseconds o. more(kg) K : Ground transmission constant, empirically determind on the Rocks, Explosive and drilling pattern ets. b : Charge exponents n : Reduced exponents Where the quantity D / W$^n$ is known as the Scale distance. Above equation is worked by the U.S Bureau of Mines to determine peak particle velocity. The propagation Law can be catagrorized in three graups. Cubic root Scaling charge per delay Square root Scaling of charge per delay Site-specific Scaling of charge per delay Charge and reduction exponents carried out by multiple regressional analysis. It's divided into under loom and over 100m distance because the frequency is verified by the distance from blast site. Empirical equation of cautious blasting vibration is as follows. Over 30 ‥‥‥under 100m ‥‥‥V=41(D/$^3$√W)$\^$-1.41/ ‥‥‥A Over 100 ‥‥‥‥under 100m ‥‥‥V=121(D/$^3$√W)$\^$-1.56/ ‥‥‥B K value on the above equation has to be more specified for furthur understang about the effect of explosives, Rock strength. And Drilling pattern on the vibration levels, it is necessary to carry out more tests.

• 화약ㆍ발파
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.39-46
• /
• 1995

This report was arrangemented and analysed by blasting previous instance of Nocsan, developing area of national factory town in Pusan since 1994. 11. our team have acquired sequential blasting machine which is used at open blasting sites of other countries. The result of study is that follow ; in case of delay electric detonator of Korea, it is possible to use 300 ~600 blasting holes in 2 charge per delay. But in our experience, it is best condition to use 100~200blasting holes at 1 charge per 1 delay.

• 화약ㆍ발파
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 1991

The cautious blasting works had been used with emulsion explosion electric M /S delay caps. Drill depth was from 3m to 6m with Crawler Drill 70mm on the calcalious sand stone (soft-moderate-semi hard Rock) . The total numbers of feet blast were 88. Scale distance were induces 15.52-60.32. It was applied to Propagation Law in blasting vibration as follows .Propagtion Law in Blasting Vibration V=k(D/W/sup b/)/sup n/ where V : Peak partical velocity(cm/sec) D : Distance between explosion and recording sites(m) W ; Maximum Charge per delay -period of eight milliseconds or more(Kg) K : Ground transmission constant, empirically determind on the Rocks, Explosive and drilling pattern ets. b : Charge exponents n : Reduced exponents Where the quantity D/W/sup b/ is known as the Scale distance. Above equation is worked by the U.S Bureau of Mines to determine peak particle velocity. The propagation Law can be catagrorized in three groups. Cabic root Scaling charge per delay Square root Scaling of charge per delay Site-specific Scaling of charge delay Charge and reduction exponents carried out by multiple regressional analysis. It's divided into under loom and over loom distance because the frequency is varified by the distance from blast site. Empirical equation of cautious blasting vibration is as follows. Over 30m--under 100m----V=41(D/ W)/sup -1.41/-----A Over l00m---------V=121(D/ W)/sup -1.56/-----B K value on the above equation has to be more specified for furthur understand about the effect of explosives. Rock strength, And Drilling pattern on the vibration levels, it is necessary to carry out more tests.

• 터널과지하공간
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.89-94
• /
• 1995

Regression analysis and a comparative study were carried out for 52 blast vibration data which were monitored by changing the monitoring distance and charge per delay. The results are as follows: 1) The square and cube root scalings and general equation which have a confidence level at the point of 90% and 99% are V90=33300(SD)-2.026 , V90=23600(SD)-1.993, V90=26300W0.755 R-2.007 and V99=48400(SD)-2.026, V99=34000(SD)-1.993 , V99=38100W0.755R-2.007, respectively. 2) There is need to decide the allowable max. charge weight per delay considering the cross points comparatively of the nomogram constructed using several predictived equations. 3) It is necessary to derive the predictive equation on the basis of blast vibration level monitored in field and to decide safe vibration level and the confidence level.

• 지질공학
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.103-118
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 제주도 거문오름동굴계 주변 지역을 개발하는 과정에서 발생되는 발파진동이 용암동굴에 미치는 영향에 대해 분석하고, 용암동굴의 효율적인 관리보존 대책을 마련하기 위해 수행되었다. 이를 위해 연구지역에서 11개의 시추공을 천공하고, 공내 지발당 장약량을 0.5 kg에서 최대 10 kg까지 변화시켜가며 현장 발파진동시험을 수행하였다. 진동속도와 진동레벨의 상관관계를 분석하여 진동규제 기준을 만족하는 진동속도를 산정한 결과, 주간 허용 진동레벨을 만족하는 진동속도는 0.276 cm/sec 이하로 평가되었다. 시험결과를 토대로 진동속도 추정식을 도출하였으며, 95% 신뢰구간에 해당하는 입지상수(k, n)에 의한 환산거리식을 통해 도출된 k 값은 자승근식에서 130.04, 삼승근식에서 199.71이며, n 값은 자승근식에서 -1.717, 삼승근식에서 -1.711인 것으로 나타났다. 진동속도 추정식을 바탕으로 진동속도에 부합하는 지발당 장약량을 평가한 결과, 일반적인 문화재 진동기준치인 진동속도 0.2 kine과 진동원과의 거리 20~100 m를 적용할 때 거리와 장약량에 따른 진동속도 추정식에서의 지발당 장약량은 0.57~7.42 kg/delay, 자승근식에서 0.21~5.29 kg/delay, 삼승근식에서 0.04~5.51 kg/delay로 나타났다. 또한, 본 연구에서 도출된 삼승근식과 선행 연구의 결과를 종합하여 0.2 kine 기준에 부합하는 상관관계식을 각각 도출하였다. 관계식을 이용하여 진동속도 0.2 kine을 만족하는 거리에 따른 허용 지발당 장약량을 산정한 결과, 50 m에서 1.07 kg/delay, 100 m에서 5.13 kg/delay, 200 m에서 22.26 kg/delay로 평가되었다. 본 연구를 통해 산출된 진동속도별 상관관계식은 거문오름용암동굴계 주변 지반의 지발당 장약량 산정 근거로 활용이 가능할 것으로 판단된다.

• 산업기술연구
• /
• 제21권A호
• /
• pp.263-271
• /
• 2001

Blast-vibration tests were carried out to determine the effects of the number of free face on the level of blast vibration. Frequency chatacteristics were also examined by using FFT analysis. To check the effects of the number of free face, charge weight per delay, drilling length, burden and space were applied uniformly and the number of free face was only changed from one to four. The results from tests were checked by regression analysis and K-value.

• 화약ㆍ발파
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.21-31
• /
• 2002

We did bench blasting upon the natural rock which it's uniaxial compressive strength was about $1,420~1,476kgf/\textrm{cm}^2$. This is the results we inferred after measuring, analyzing the ground vibration velocity of the front and back direction from the free face of the bench blasting. We have to induce the square and cube root scaled equation and the general equation to guarantee confidence upon the data when analyzing the measurement data of the test blasting. The variable distance is in reverse proportion to the permitted ground vibration velocity. The shorter is the exploding point to a protection structure, the bigger is the reflection that the direction of the free face experts the ground vibration velocity, The ground vibration velocity front of the free face tends become reduced about 38~46% compare with back of the free face in the range that the permitted ground vibration velocity is 2.0~5.0mm/sec. In case of 2.0mm/sec, when a protection structure is within about 95m, the max. allowable charge weight per delay on positing front of the free face can be more used about 2.61 times than that on positing back of the free face, in case of 3.0mm/sec within about 78m more about 2.38 times, in case of 5.0mm/sec within 60m more about 2.10 times. In case of 2.0~5.0mm/sec when a protection structure is within about 200m front from the free face, the max. allowable charge weight per delay can become about 1.52 times than the case on back to the free face.

• 터널과지하공간
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.97-109
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 현재 제품화 되고 있는 뇌관의 지연시차인 20, 25 ms의 지연시차와 기폭위치(정기폭, 중간기폭, 역기폭)에 따라 발파에 의한 지반진동의 전파특성을 파악하기 위해 공간격, 저항선, 천공장 그리고 장약량을 달리하여 총 4회의 시험발파를 실시하여 지반진동 예측식을 도출하였다. 도출된 평균 지반진동 예측식을 통해 지연시차와 기폭위치에 따른 최대입자속도의 노모그램 분석을 통해 진동특성을 규명하였고, 국토교통부의 "도로공사 노천발파 설계 시공 지침 및 요령"에 제시된 표준발파공법의 공법별 경계 기준 장약량인 0.5, 1.6, 5, 15 kg을 적용하여 진동중가율을 비교분석하였다. 그리하여 장약량에 따라 진동제어에 유리한 발파방법을 제안하여 발파설계의 인자로 사용할 수 있도록 하였다.