• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제14권12호
• /
• pp.7569-7576
• /
• 2013

Background: The purpose of this article is to present preliminary results of simultaneous boost irradiation radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: Fifty-eight patients who underwent simultaneous boost irradiation radiotherapy for NPC in Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University between September 2004 and December 2009 were eligible. Acute and late toxicities were scored weekly according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute and late radiation morbidity scoring schemes. An especial focus was on evidence of post-radiation brain injury. Also quality of life was analysed according to the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) recommendations. Discrete variables were compared by ${\chi}^2$ test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rates and generate survival curves. Results: A total of 58 patients with a mean follow-up time of 36 months completed clinical trials.Fifty-seven patients (98.3) achieved complete remission in the primary sites and cervical lymph nodes, with only one patient (1.7%) showing partial remission.The most frequently observed acute toxicities during the concurrent chemoradiotherapy were mucositis and leucopenia. Four patients (6.9%) had RTOG grade 3 mucositis, whereas four patients (6.9%) had grade 3 leucopenia. No patient had grade 4 acute toxicity. Three (5.17%) of the patients exhibited injury to the brain on routine MRI examination, with a median observation of 32 months (range, 25-42months). All of them were RTOG grade 0. The 3-year overall, regional-free and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 85%, 94% and 91%, respectively. Conclusion: Simultaneous boost irradiation radiotherapy is feasible in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The results showed excellent local control and overall survival, with no significant increase the incidence of radiation brain injury or the extent of damage. A larger population of patients and a longer follow-up period are needed to evaluate ultimate tumor control and late toxicity.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권11호
• /
• pp.4791-4795
• /
• 2015

Purpose: This study was conducted to observe the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed based chemotherapy in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancers as first-line, second-line or third-line therapy. Materials and Methods: From May 2011 to January 2015, we recruited 29 patients with advanced breast cancer, 19 patients with advanced ovary cancer, 17 patients with advanced esophageal cancer,5 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer,5 patients with advanced cervical cancer and 1 patient with advanced tongue cancer in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Research Institute.All of them were pathologically confirmed and treated with pemetrexed based chemotherapy. After two cycles of treatment,efficacy and safety can be evaluated. Results: For pemetrexed based regimens,including 76 patients with 6 kinds of advanced cancer were considered eligible for inclusion. Complete remission represents CR, partial remission represents PR, stable disease represents SD, progressive disease represents PD. Among 29 patients with advanced breast cancer, 4 patients chose pemetrexed based regimens as second-line treatment,1 of them was PR,the other 3 got SD. The last 25 patients made use of this chemotherapy as third-line treatment, except one patient could not be assessed, 2 of them got PR,6 of them got SD,the remaining 16 of them finally were PD.19 patients with advanced ovary cancer,5 patients used this regimens as second-line treatment, 3 of them got PD,the remaining patients got SD, respectively. The last 14 patients made use of pemetrexed based regimens as third-line treatment,. RR (CR+PR) was 28.5%. Among 17 patients with advanced esophageal cancer, 2 patients made use of pemetrexed based regimens as first-line treatment,both of them got PR.4 of them used this chemotherapy as second-line regimen, except 2 patients could not be assessed,the remaining 2 was PD at last. The last 11 patients was third-line users, RR (CR+PR) was 18.2%. Among 5 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer, pemetrexed based regimens was used in 1 patient as first-line treatment and 1 patient as second-line treatment. The curative effect was SD and PD, respectively. 3 patients accepted pemetrexed based regimens as third-line treatment, 2 of them got PD as results and another was SD. Among 5 patients with advanced cervical cancer, just 1 patient adopted pemetrexed based regimens as first-line treatment, whose curative effect was PR.2 patients chose this chemotherapy regimens as second-line treatment. Both of them got PD as their consequence. The last 2 patients made use of the regimens as third-line treatment, the effect of them was PD and SD, respectively. The one who with advanced tongue cancer, pemetrexed based regimens was used as second-line treatment, and the consequence was PD. About 71.1% patients experienced bone marrow suppression. Among them, 5 patients reached 4 grade. Other toxicity of pemetrexed were neurotoxicity, fatigue, diarrhea, dysphagia and vomiting. No treatment related death occurred with pemetrexed-based treatment. Conclusions: Pemetrexed based chemotherapy has considerable effect in patients with advanced cancers such as breast cancer,esophageal cancer and ovary cancer. More randomly clinical trials are needed to verify the results.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.300-308
• /
• 2000

목적 :자궁경부암은 우리나라 여성에서 가장 많은 발생을 보이는 악성종양으로 비교적 완치율이 높은 것으로 알려져 있다. 자궁경부암의 치료는 병원 마다 매우 다양해졌으나 방사선에 의한 치료가 주이며 높은 완치율을 얻고있다. 치료의 실패는 대부분 3년이내에 일어나며, 국소재발시에는 자궁방 결합조직에서 더 많이 재발하는 것으로 보고되고 있다. 이에 저자들은 방사선치료를 받은 자궁경부암 환자를 대상으로 이들의 치료성적과 재발여부를 후향적으로 분석하여 생존률과 재발에 영향을 미치는 인자들을 분석하여 보았다. 대상 및 방법 : 1981년 1월 1일부터 1998년 12월 31일까지 고려대학교 방사선 종양학과에서 자궁경부암으로 방사선 치료를 받은 970명중 추적관찰이 가능했던 827명을 대상으로 하였다. 대상환자는 방사선 단독치료군과 수술후 방사선치료군으로 나누었으며 각 환자에 대하여 나이, 임상적 병기, 세포병리학적 소견, 재발유무 등이 치료결과에 미치는 영향을 알아보았고 특히 치료 후 자궁경부질세포진검사(Papanicolaou smear; Pap smear), 배아성항원(carcinoembryogenic antigen; CEA)와 편평상피 암종항원(squamous cell carcinoma antigen; SCC antigen) 수치가 생존률과 국소재발에 유의한 인자인가를 알아보았다. 결과: 전체환자의 평균나이는 51.3세(방사선 단독치료존 53.1세, 수술 후 치료곰 48.3세)였고, 평균 추적관찰기간은 38.6개월(방사선 단독치료군: 38.8개월, 수술후 치료군: 38.4개월)이었다. 방사선 단독치료군의 경우 대상환자는 521명이었고, 임상병기는 CIS; 5명, IA; 3명, IB; 36명, IIA; 77명, IIB; 284명, IIIA; 31명, IIIB; 47명, IVA; 21명, IVB; 3명, 재발암 14명이었다. 세포병리학적 소견상 편평상피암 495명, 선세포암 23명이었고 완치상태로 추적관찰된 환자는 314명(60.3$\%$), 국소재발: 47명(9$\%$), 대동맥 림프절전이; 28명(5$\%$), 폐전이: 19명(4$\%$), 골전이: 12명(2$\%$)이었다. 수술 후 치료군은 326명이었고 임상병기는 CIS; 6명, IA: 50명, IB: 181명, IIA; 46명, IIB; 43명이었다. 세포병리학적 소견상 편평상피암: 291명, 선세포앓 32명이었고, 완치상태로 추적관찰된 환자는 276명(85$\%$), 국소재발 8명(2$\%$), 대동맥 림프절전이: 7명(2$\%$), 폐전이: 10명(3$\%$), 골전이; 10(3$\%$)이었다. 전체환자를 대상으로 분석한 결과 5년 생존율은 71.2$\%$(방사선 단독치료군: 55.8$\%$, 수술 후 치료군: 88.1$\%$)였고 생존율에 있어서는 단변량분석상 임상병기(p=0.0001), 재발유무(p=0.0001), 방사선치료 후 자궁경부질세포진검(p=0.0329), CEA수치($\geq$5 ng/ml, p=0.00001), SCC수치$\geq$2 ng/ml, p=0.0001)가 의미있는 인자로 나타났고, 재발율에 있어서는 CEA가 $\geq$5 ng/ml인 경우, SCC는 $\geq$2 ng/ml인 경우가 2$\~$3배 높은 것으로 나타났다. 결론: 방사선치료 후 Pap smear, CEA, SCC는 생존율과 재발율에 모두 비교적 의미있게 작용하는 예후인자로 나타나 앞으로 방사선치료 후 환자의 추적관찰시 자궁경부암의 국소재발과 전이 그리고 생존률을 미리 예견할 수 있는 지표로 삼을 수 있을 것이다.

• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제58권3호
• /
• pp.248-253
• /
• 2015

Objective : The treatment of giant cell tumor (GCT) is mainly performed surgically. However, GCT in spine seems difficult to treat because of the limited surgical accessibility and proximity. In this report, we analyzed the outcome of GCT treatment in spine. Methods : Between 2000 and 2012, 19 patients received treatment for GCT in spine. Median age at their first diagnosis was 31 years, 10 patients were male, and 9 female. Fourteen tumors were located in the sacrum, 1 in cervical, 1 in thoracic and 3 in lumbar spine. As primary treatment, gross total removal (GTR) was done in 6 patients, and subtotal removal (STR) in 13 patients. Radiation therapy (RT) as an adjuvant therapy was performed in 2 cases in GTR group and 10 cases in STR group. Results : During the follow-up, 7 patients had local recurrence (36.8%). The average period until recurrence after primary treatment was 14 months. No recurrence was detected in GTR group. Recurrence was noted in 7 out of 13 patients who underwent STR. These differences were statistically significant (p=0.024). A median of recurrence free period (RFP) was 84 months. Also average RFP of the RT group was 112 months, and non-RT group was 65 months. These differences were statistically significant (p=0.041). Conclusion : Treatment of choice for GCT in spine is a complete removal of tumor without neurological deficits. In case of incomplete removal, radiation therapy may be a useful adjuvant treatment modality.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.113-119
• /
• 1999

목적 :국소적으로 진행된 자궁경부암 환자에서 저용량의 Cisplatin을 방사선민감제로 사용하여 방사선치료와 동시 치료하였을 때의 급성독성 평가와 초기 반응을 평가하기 위하여 연구를 시행하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 본 연구는 1996년 12월부터 1999년 1월까지 FIGO Stage IIB-IIIB의 진행된 자궁경부암 환자 38명을 대상으로 하였다. 16명은 자궁경부암의 크기가 4cm이상인 환자들로 방사선 치료와 저용량의 cisplatin을 매일 동시에 치료 하였으며, 나머지 환자에선 방사선 치료 단독으로 치료하였다. 방사선치료는 골반강에 외부 방사선치료로 4500 cGy(3060cGy시행이후 midline block 추가), 자궁옅조직으로 침범이 있는 경우에는 자궁옅조직으로 방사선치료 부위를 줄여 900-1000cGy 추가치료를 시행하였고, 내부치료는 Ir$^{192}$고선량 근접 치료기(micro-Selectron HDR)로 6극회의 강 내조사(point "A"에 3000 to 3500cGy, 500cGy/fx, 2회/week)를 시행하였다. 방사선치료와 저용량의 cisplatin을 동시에 사용한 군에서는 방사선치료 첫날부터 방사선치료 20일째 되는 날까지 저용량의 cisplatin 10mg을 방사선치료 30분 전에 투여하였다. 급성독성의 평가는 expanded common toxicity criteria of the NCI Clinical Trial을 이용하였다. 초기반응의 평가는 방사선치료 종료이후 최소 4주이상의 추적조사가 가능한 사람들을 대상으로 시행되었다. 결과 : 급성독성 평가는 전체 38명에서 평가 가능하였으며, 방사선치료와 저용량의 cisplatin을 병용한 군에서 16명 중 6명(37.5$\%$)에서, 방사선 단독으로 치료한 군에서는 22명중 1명(6.2$\%$)에서 3등급 이상의 백혈구감소를 보였으며, 통계학적으로 의미있는 차이를 보였다 (P=0.030). 3등급 이상의 급성 위장간 독성은 저용량의 cisplatin을 병용한 군에서만 4명이 있었으나, 2-3일의 치료 중단이후 증상이 완화되어서 치료를 계속할 수 있었으며, 치료중 5kg이상의 체중감소는 방사선치료와 저용량의 cisplatin을 병용한 군에서는 16명중 3명(18.7$\%$), 방사선 단독으로 치료한 군에서는 22명중 2명(9.1$\%$)으로 통계학적으로 의미 있는 차이를 보이지 않았다(P=0.63). 초기반응은 추적조사가 4주 이상 가능하였던 34명을 대상으로 하였으며, 저용량의 cisplatin을 병용한 군에서 14명중 11명 (78$\%$), 방사선 단독으로 치료 군에서 20명중 16명(80$\%$)으로 통계학적으로는 의미있는 차이를 보이지 않았다(P=0.126). 결론 :국소 진행된 자궁경부암에 대한 방사선치료와 저용량의 cisplatin 병용요법 치료시 3등급 이상의 백혈구감소가 방사선치료 단독으로 치료시보다 많았으나, 1주 이하의 치료중단 이후 치료를 계속 할 수 있었으며, 4등급 이상의 백혈구감소와 치료에 의한 사망은 없었다. 초기반응에 대한 평가는 저용량의 cisplatin병용 군에서 4cm 이상의 자궁경부암을 가진 환자가 많음에도 불구하고 양 군에서 비슷한 정도의 반응을 보였으므로 진행된 자궁경부암의 치료에서 저용량의 cisplatin을 방사선민감제로 사용하여 치료결과의 향상을 기대할 수 있게 되었다. 따라서 저용량의 clsplatin과 방사선치료를 병용요법하였을 때의 치료효과를 판정하기 위해서는 phase III study가 필요하다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.355-361
• /
• 1993

본 연구는 1991년 5월부터 국소적으로 진행된 자궁경부암 (FIGO stage IIB~IVA) 환자를 대상으로 5-FU와 Cis-platinum을 방사선 치료와 동시에 투여하여 치료 독성, 치료의 적합성과 국소관해율을 평가하기 위해 시행되었다. 방사선 치료는 외부방사선 조사로 전골반부에 23회에 걸쳐 4140 cGy 시행후, 고선량 근접치료기로 강내조사를 6회 내지 7회 (A점에 $3000\~3500$ cGy) 시행하였으며, B점에 추가조사를 시행하여 IIB병기 환자는 6000 cGy까지 IIIB병기 환자는 6500 cGy가지 B점에 조사되도록 하였다. 첫 번째 항암화학요법은 외부방사선 치료 시행의 두번째 주에 5-FU는 $1000 mg/m^2/24hr$를 96시간 동안에 걸쳐 토여하고 Cis-platinum은 $20mg/m^2/day$를 3일 투여하였다. 두번째 항암화학요법은 처음과 동일한 방법으로 첫번째 고선량 근접 강내 치료가 시행될 때 투여 되었다. 1993년 8월까지 총 16명의 환자(10 IIB 병기, 4 IIIB병기, 2 IVA 병기)가 등록되었으며, 이중 2명은 외부방사선 2회 조사후 치료를 중단하였으며, 1명은 강내치료중 3등급의 비뇨기계독성으로 치료를 중단하였다. 2회의 항암화학 요법이 종료된 후 독성의 평가가 가능했던 14명의 환자중 5명이 3등급의 위장관독성이 발생하였으나, 4명은 치료종료후 평가에서 회복되었다. 1명은 병기 IIIB환자로 초기에 서혜부 임파절 전이가 있어 다량의 방사선이 조사되었는데, 치료종료 후에 위장관독성이 악화되었고, 1개월후 원격전이로 사망하였다. 치료후 치료전 체중의 $10\%$ 이상 감소된 환자는 2명이었고, 1명이 3등급의 백혈구 감소를 보였다. 환자의 평균 치료 기간은 75일(포준 치료 기간은 $70\pm7$일)이었고, 80일 이상인 환자는 3명 (84, 84, 89일)이었다. 추적관찰 가능했던 13명 환자중 8명이 완전관해를 보였고, 특히 IIB병기 환자의 경우 9명중 8명이 완전관해를 보였다. 본 연구결과 진전된 자궁 경부암에서 방사선과 항암화학요법 병행치료는 효과나 독성면에서 수용가능 하였으나 향후 근치적 방사선치료 단독으로 시행된 경우와의 전향적 비교연구가 필요할 것으로 생각된다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권12호
• /
• pp.4839-4841
• /
• 2015

We conducted a retrospectively reviewed of the literature published of patients underwent fertility-preserving treatments for cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancers using the WANFANG database in Chinese. A majority were retrospective studies and case reports. With cervical cancer, radical trachelectomy(RT) in combination with pelvic lymphadenectomy could preserve the fertility of patients with early stage IA1-IB1 cancers, Tumor size ${\leq}2cm$ should be emphasized as the indication of RT in considering of the higher recurrent rate in patients with tumor size >2cm. For endometrial cancers, there is much experience on it. Given accurate pretreatment assessment, hormonal therapy is feasible management option to preserve fertility in young patients with early stage lesions that limited to the endometrium and well differentiated. High dose progestin have been applied, oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 250-500mg/day, megestrol acetate 160-480mg/day. Other therapies that have been used in a limited number of cases include GnRH analog, intrauterine devices (IUDS) containing progestogen, usually combination of these therapies. All patients should be followed up by ultrasound and/or MRI evaluation, and endometrial curettage at intervals of 3 months. With ovarian cancer, in China, fertilitypreserving surgery in patients with stage IA (grade G1) of epithelial ovarian tumor and patients with germ cell tumor and borderline ovarian tumor have been successfully performed.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.306-311
• /
• 2005

Despite advances in surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, the survival of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma has not significantly improved over the past several decades. Gene therapy is currently under investigation and shows us new possibility of cancer curing method. This experiment was undergone to find out the cell growth inhibition effect and evidence of apoptosis by HCCS-1(human cervical cancer suppressor-1), one of the candidates of tumor suppressor gene, transducted to human oral cancer cell line. To determine the efficiency of the adenovirus as a gene delivery vector cell line was transducted with LacZ gene and analysed with X-gal staining. Northern blot was performed to confirm the transfection with HSCC-1 gene and cell viability was assessed by cell cytotoxicity assay using cell count kit(CCK). To show the evidence of apoptosis, DNA fragmentation assay and flow cytometry(FACS) were performed. We had successfully construct the recombinant HSCC-1 adenovirus(Ad5CMV-HCCS-1), and importation efficiency was 20% at 2 MOI(multiplicity of infection), 80% at 20 MOI. Northern blot analysis showed that a single 0.6kb mRNA transcript was expressed in Ad5CMV-HCCS-1 transducted cell lines. As a result of CCK, when comparing to control subjects, transducted group showed 50% growth inhibition. In DNA fragmentation assay, according to increasing of MOI, DNA volume was diminished. In FACS analysis, DNA distribution showed fragmentation. This results imply that HCCS-1gene has growth inhibition effect in human oral cancer cell lines through apoptosis induction.

• 대한두경부종양학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.194-197
• /
• 2001

Background and Objectives: Supraglottic cancer have a great tendency to spread cervical lymph nodes and lymph node metastasis is a well known prognostic factor. However the treatment for N0 neck in supraglottic cancer is still controversial. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our neck management of supraglottic cancer patients who present with cN0 contralateral neck from 1989 through 1997. 36 patients were eligible for analysis. The primary site was surgically removed and the neck was managed by elective neck irradiation (ENI), elective neck dissection (END), or therapeutic neck dissection (TND) with postoperative radiation therapy (PORT). Results: Our results revealed that 18 of 36 patients have clinically negative neck, another 18 patients have clinically positive neck (N1-3). In clinically negative group, 12 of 18 patients were received ENI and there was 1 failure in contralateral neck area. Remaining 6 patients were received END with PORT and there was no failure. In clinically positive neck group, 3 of 18 patients were received ipsilateral TND and an additional contralateral END with PORT. Remaining 15 patients who were received TND with PORT, developed 3 neck failure. Conclusion: ENI or ipsilateral or bilateral END can be done in the cN0 neck of supraglottic cancer however ipsilateral TND and contralateral END with PORT is reasonable for the cN(+) neck.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.131-137
• /
• 2016

목 적 : 자궁경부암 환자의 방사선 치료 시 다른 장기의 위치 변화 및 부작용을 줄이기 위해 방광의 체적을 일정하게 유지하도록 한 후 초음파를 이용하여 방광의 체적 변화를 측정하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 2015년 9월부터 12월까지 부산대학교병원에서 방사선 치료를 받은 환자 11명을 대상으로 하였다. 방광의 체적을 일정하게 유지하기 위하여 CT치료설계 전후, 모의치료 60분전에 500 cc의 물을 마시도록 설계되었다. 치료설계 전후, 모의치료, 치료계획 시 방광의 체적을 비교분석하였다. 결 과 : CT스캔상에서 측정한 방광의 평균 체적과 오차는 치료설계시와 비교한 결과 편차가 작다. CT치료설계시와 CT치료설계직후는 통계적으로 유의하며 상관관계가 있는 것으로 보이고 초음파를 이용하여 측정한 방광의 체적은 CT상에서의 체적보다 크다. 다만 CT치료설계시와 모의치료 시는 통계적으로 유의하지 않았다. 결 론 : 모의치료시 일정한 양의 물을 마시도록 지시한 것이 방광의 체적을 유지하는데 도움이 될수 있었다. 그러나 배변과 일정한 양의 물을 마시도록 지시하더라도 모의치료시 방광의 체적을 일정히 유지하는데는 어려움이 있었다. 또한 환자들이 지시에 따라 정확히 수행하는 여부가 중요하다.