• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.109-123
• /
• 2008

This study is aimed to establish an investment decision model for offshore aquaculture project of rock bream in Korea using a certainty equivalent method (CEM) based on the expected utility theory and to investigate its economic viability under risk and uncertainty. In the analysis with CEM, the effects of risk attitude and risk level on investment and risk premium were examined and the impacts of various risk and uncertainty factors on the investment decision were also assessed. In addition, the outcomes were compared to those evaluated by the traditional net present value (NPV) method. Results show that risk premium grew as the investors became more risk averse and uncertainty level (the variance of NPV) increased. Consequently, the certainty equivalent value was predicted to decrease from the value assessed by the traditional NPV method.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제22권51호
• /
• pp.151-161
• /
• 1999

For many decades, Deterministic DCF approach has been widely used to evaluate investment opportunities. Under new manufacturing conditions involving uncertainty and risk, the DCF approach is not appropriate. In DCF, Risk is incorporated in two ways: certainty equivalent method, risk adjusted discount rate. This paper proposes a determination method of the Risk Adjusted Discount Rate for economically decision making advanced manufacturing technologies. Conventional DCF techniques typically use discount rate which do not consider the difference in risk of differential investment options and periods. Due to their relative efficiency, advanced manufacturing technologies have different degree of risk. The risk differential of investments is included using $\beta$ coefficient of capital asset pricing model. The comparison between existing and proposed method investigated. The DCF model using proposed risk adjusted discount rate enable more reasonable evaluation of advanced manufacturing technologies.

• 재무관리연구
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.165-188
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 개별 자산의 수익률 분포에 대한 가정 없이 평균-VaR 기준에서의 프론티어 포트폴리오를 구하고, 수익률 분포의 고차 적률에 대한 투자자의 선호가 반영된 최적 포트폴리오를 선택하는 방법을 제시하였다. 프론티어 포트폴리오를 구하기 위해 수익률 분포에 대한 가정이 필요하지 않은 그리드와 랭크 방법을 제시하였고 최적 포트폴리오를 선택하기 위해 수익률 분포의 4차 적률까지 고려된 효용함수를 사용하였다. 제시한 방법론을 실제 자료에 적용해 보기위해 모건 스탠리에서 제공하는 선진국 지수, 개발도상국 지수, KOSPI 지수의 주별 수익률 자료를 사용하였다. 평균-VaR 기준과 평균-분산 기준에서의 프론티어 포트폴리오를 구하고 각 기준에서의 최적 포트폴리오를 선택해 서로 비교하였다. 표준편차의 차이뿐만 아니라 효용함수의 수준과 주별 기대수익률로 표현되는 확실성 등가의 차이를 살펴봄으로써 두 기준 간의 경제적 의미 차이에 대해서도 살펴보았다. 또한 부트스트래핑을 이용한 역사적 시뮬레이션의 방법을 사용해 두 기준 간 발생한 차이가 통계적으로 유의한 지를 본 연구에서 적용한 자료에서는 평균-VaR 기준의 투자자가 평균-분산 기준의 투자자에 비해 더 큰 표준편차를 지닌 최적 포트폴리오를 선택하고 위험 회피도가 큰 투자자일수록 평균-VaR 기준에서의 효용이 크고 확실성 등가도 더 크게 나타나는 경향이 나타났다. 그러나 두 기준 간 발생한 차이가 통계적으로 유의하지 않게 나타나 표준편차의 차이와 경제적인 의미 차이가 크지 않다는 사실을 확인하였다.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제51권2호
• /
• pp.171-184
• /
• 2023

Purpose: First, this paper suggests an alternative approach to find optimal portfolio (stocks, bonds and ESG stocks) under the maximizing utility of investors. Second, we include ESG stocks in our optimal portfolio, and compare improvement of welfares in the case with and without ESG stocks in portfolio. Methods: Our main method of analysis follows Brennan et al(2002), designed under the continuous time framework. We assume that the dynamics of stock price follow the Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) while the short rate have the Vasicek model. For the utility function of investors, we use the Power Utility Function, which commonly used in financial studies. The optimal portfolio and welfares are derived in the partial equilibrium. The parameters are estimated by using Kalman filter and ordinary least square method. Results: During the overall analysis period, the portfolio including ESG, did not show clear welfare improvement. In 2017, it has slightly exceeded this benchmark 1, showing the possibility of improvement, but the ESG stocks we selected have not strongly shown statistically significant welfare improvement results. This paper showed that the factors affecting optimal asset allocation and welfare improvement were different each other. We also found that the proportion of optimal asset allocation was affected by factors such as asset return, volatility, and inverse correlation between stocks and bonds, similar to traditional financial theory. Conclusion: The portfolio with ESG investment did not show significant results in welfare improvement is due to that 1) the KRX ESG Leaders 150 selected in our study is an index based on ESG integrated scores, which are designed to affect stability rather than profitability. And 2) Korea has a short history of ESG investment. During the limited analysis period, the performance of stock-related assets was inferior to bond assets at the time of the interest rate drop.