• Title/Summary/Keyword: capitalist

Search Result 180, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

What is the Origin of Inequalities in Work and Health? (노동과 건강 불평등, 그 근원은 어디인가?)

  • Son, Mi-A
    • Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
    • /
    • v.38 no.3
    • /
    • pp.241-251
    • /
    • 2005
  • There has been an enormous increasing trend of widening gap of social inequalities since economic crisis at the end of 1997 in Korea. Since then, Korean society has deteriorated in economic and social conditions; the unemployment rate, temporary or casual workers and absolute poverty have increased. This paper presents the origin of inequalities in work and health in Korea. The origin of inequalities in work begins with the relationship between the capitalist and labourers in the capitalist mode of production. The conception and execution are dissolved in the work process in the capitalist mode of production. Thus, captitalists become control over ther labour process from workers. An alienation of the work process from the workers. The distribution of work is the majour source if inequalities in many countries as well as Korea. This paper presents the increasing tendency of unhealthy states such as mortality, early death, morbidity, physical work load, workplace injury amongst the under-privileged: ordinary workers, unemployed people, casual workers and socially deprived people in Korea.

A study on the domestic labor-with emphasis on the reproduction of labor power (가사노동의 성격에 대한 연구-노동력재생산을 중심으로)

  • 홍승아
    • Journal of Families and Better Life
    • /
    • v.16 no.2
    • /
    • pp.11-22
    • /
    • 1998
  • The purpose of this study is to contribute to the theoretical understanding of the nature of domestic labor in relation to the capitalist economic system. In this study I adopted the reproduction of labor for the analytical term. Also I owed theoretical basis to the political economy to analyze the relation between domestic labor and capitalist economy. The family is a very important place which functions to maintain and change both the present and future labor what is called the reproduction of labor power. It also has a close relationship with the total society. The reproduction of labor power is divided by 'gender division of labor' which allocates the responsibility to one gender(women) and exempts it to another gender(men). In conclusion the domestic labor is the very basis of capitalist economy and it is also the preliminary condition to its system. SO we can fully understand the capitalist economy with the 'visible' labor part and the 'invisible' domestic labor part inc usively. And we can also understand the interrelationship between family and labor market which constitutes one economic system and fuctions in it.

  • PDF

Theories of the state and the state intervention in space economy (國家理論과 空間經濟에의 國家干涉)

  • ;Koh, Taekyung
    • Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
    • /
    • v.29 no.3
    • /
    • pp.281-296
    • /
    • 1994
  • It is generally accepted that there is always a potential for crisis in the capitalist society because of the internal contradiction of capitalism. The contradiction is explicitly and implicitly expressed in space. The fundamental contradiction in capitalism, however, is controlled and mediated by the state (i.e., the capitalist state). We thus could argue that the state plays an important role in the capitalist society and in the capitalist spatial formation. It is necessary to note how and why spatial structure has developed unevenly in capitalist societies, particularly in the U.S., The general concept of uneven geographical development is understood in the context of the capitalist economic system and the role of the state. But the problem is that the capitalist state itself has a contradiction between the productive function (i.e., accumulation function) and the reproductive function (i.e., legitimation function). The compromise of the two functions is always the dilemma of the state and the state becomes the object of class struggle (e.g., political class struggle) . The research questions are as follows. First, what is the role of the state in the economic structure and what is the internal problem of the state\ulcorner Second, what is the role of the state in space economy (or in spatial structure)\ulcorner And last, what is the relation between the federal state and the local state in the U.S. and how does the relation form the urban policies and thus the urban and regional development\ulcorner The paper will be looking at how the political economy in the U.S. explains unevenly developed geographical phenomenon.

  • PDF

A Comparative Study on Land Reform between Capitalist and Socialist (자본주의(資本主義)와 사회주의(社會主義) 농지개혁(農地改革) 비교연구(比較硏究))

  • Kim, Jai Hong
    • Korean Journal of Agricultural Science
    • /
    • v.10 no.2
    • /
    • pp.382-392
    • /
    • 1983
  • Land Reform is a distributive measure which transfers power, property, income and status from one group in the community to another. There are two strategies in land reform, capitalist strategy and socialist strategy. The two strategies are different not only in their objectives and ideologies, but also in the method of land allotment and confiscatin. Capitalist land reform is aimed at accomplishing the land -to -the -tiller program of which the implementing process is always included rent reduction and sale of public lands. Socialist land reform is aimed at achieving abolition of property right of land and application of all rent revenue from land to public purpose. The process of the socialist land reform is comprising Bauernbefreiung and land collectivization. In conclusion, the former is resulted in high productivity of land and the later is identified low productivity of land.

  • PDF

The Significance of the Narrative Failure of The Conjure Woman: A Black Author's Experiment on a Socio-ethical Literary Voice

  • Kim, EunHyoung
    • Journal of English Language & Literature
    • /
    • v.55 no.6
    • /
    • pp.1163-1191
    • /
    • 2009
  • As many critics do, this article starts from the premise that Charles Waddell Chesnutt wrote The Conjure Woman with a distinct socio-ethical view to ameliorating white readers' racism. For this purpose of social activism, first, the author uses a racially submissive genre and narrator- antebellum plantation-dialect fiction and an old ex-slave Julius-in order to win the attention of white racists, who constituted the majority of the reading public of postbellum America. Chesnutt then allows this seemingly submissive ex-slave consecutively to wage narrative battles against a Northern white capitalist, John. This fiction's structure is thus based on interracial narrative conflict. Granted, the result of these narrative battles is Julius's defeat. Even though he sometimes has narrative success through his manipulation of either his white female auditor's sentimentalism or the white capitalist's racial prejudice, it does not lead to any fundamental change in the white audience members' awareness: John still regards Julius's tacitly reformoriented tales merely as nonsensical ghost stories invented by the absurd imagination of a subservient, entertaining, and exploitable black coachman. Admitting his defeat, Julius relinquishes his original goal of deterring John's capitalist exploitation of both racial Others and the natural environment of the South and finally decides to serve the economic power of white capitalism. This self-defeating conclusion, however, should not be identified with Chesnutt's failure as an author. Rather, it should be understood as an interim result of the black author's earnest experiment with literary media best suited to his reform project. In fact, this narrative failure reveals Chesnutt's accurate diagnosis of the postbellum literary world: a black voice is still feebly heard and even easily buried by the whites' capitalist ambition and consequently intensifying racism. Conclusively, Julius's narrative failure should be positively evaluated as Chesnutt's one step further in his gradual and lifelong progress to a narrative goopher effectively to engage whites' imagination and sympathy for a vision of equal interracial coexistence.

Technology and Exploitation : Limitation of Capitalist Technological Development (과학기술과 착취 : 자본주도형 기술 개발의 한계)

  • Shin, Eun-hwa
    • Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
    • /
    • v.146
    • /
    • pp.115-135
    • /
    • 2018
  • This article attempts to deal with the problem that science and technology function as a mechanism to oppress and exploit humans rather than to release humans from labor. To explore this subject, it is necessary to consider the difference between the theory of labor value and the theory of 'technology value'. In addition, it is also important to refer to Marx's critical view of the 'capitalist' use of technology. Above all, Marx' concepts of relative surplus value and special surplus value, and his analysis of organic composition of capital are still valid in explaining that development of technology tightens control over workers and intensity of labor, and worsens instability of employment. Reflection of the limitations of capitalist development of technology is also important for realization of its usefulness. Industry 4.0 in Germany therefore deserves to be noticed as a good example because it shows a different way from extreme capitalist exploitation. The model suggests also some points that shouldn't be overlooked, when we try to actualize the tremendous slogan of the current fourth industrial revolution as real innovation and progress in human life. In this matter, the most important point is the possibility of technological development that doesn't oppose workers' interests.

A Game Model on the Venture Capitalist's Investment Strategies Capitalists under Uncertainty and Information Asymmetry (불확실성과 정보비대칭성 하에서 벤처캐피탈의 투자전략에 관한 게임 모형)

  • Lee, Ju-Heon
    • Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
    • /
    • 2004.05a
    • /
    • pp.568-571
    • /
    • 2004
  • 본 논문의 목적은 벤처캐피탈(Venture Capitalist)의 투자전략을 게임이론을 통해 분석하고 이해하자는 것이다. 벤처캐피탈은 성장가능성은 높지만 불확실한 벤처기업에 투자하는 전문투자자이다. 벤처캐피탈은 이익을 극대화하기 위해서 성장가능성이 크고 위험관리가 가능한 기업에 투자를 하여야 한다. 하지만, 벤처캐피탈은 일반적으로 제한된 시간과 벤처기업의 속성 때문에 기업에 대한 정보가 부족한 상태에서 투자결정을 내려야 하는 경우가 대부분이다. 투자가 이루어진 후 벤처캐피탈은 벤처기업의 운영 및 기업활동을 감시(Monitor)하고 자문활동(Consulting Activity)을 수행하면서 차츰 기업에 대한 정보를 습득하게 되고 기업의 가치를 판단할 수 있게 된다. 본 논문은 앞에서 기술한 바와 같은 정보 불확실성 상태에서 창업자의 효용(utility)와 벤처캐피탈의 가치평가(value evaluation)를 바탕으로 벤처캐피탈의 투자전략을 게임이론을 통해 분석하였다. 본 논문은 벤처캐피탈이 전환사채형태의 투자를 하는 논거를 밝혀내었다.

  • PDF

An Empirical Analysis on the Determinants of Scope of Public Health : the case of developed countries (선진산업국가에서의 공공의료규모 결정요인에 관한 실증분석)

  • 김흥식
    • Health Policy and Management
    • /
    • v.5 no.2
    • /
    • pp.1-17
    • /
    • 1995
  • This paper porports to explicate the factors determining the scope of public health in advanced capitalist countries. A few studies have veen conducted for such a purpose, yet even these studies show the deficiency of failing to consider a very important factor : the influence of medical profession. Since medical profession has played a significant role in the health policymaking, it is necessary to incorporate the hypothesis that assumes the causal links between the differing medical professional power and the vrying scope of public health. Following this view, this paper examined the various hypothese, including the power of medical profession, and found that the variables related to medical professional power as well as social democratic perspectives are its significant factors. In particular, our result shows that the power of medical profesion is the most important determinant, thereby supporting the hypothesis developed in this paper.

  • PDF

Urban History and 'Geohistory' of E. W. Soja

  • Hong, Yong-Jin
    • Journal of East-Asian Urban History
    • /
    • v.2 no.1
    • /
    • pp.163-190
    • /
    • 2020
  • This paper aims to introduce and understand critically the work of Edward Soja, mainly the First part of the which develops his own concepts, such as 'synekism', 'trialectics of space', 'regionality' and 'geohistory'. Most of all, in explaining Geohistory, he emphasizes three 'Urban revolutions': First Urban revolutions in Jericho and ÇatalHüyük, which shows first synekism as proto urban society, Second in Ur and other Sumerian cities where appeared a concentrated power of central government and its transcendental ideologies, and Third in Manchester and in Chicago, typical capitalist cities. These three urban revolutions don't correspond to the established historical periodization. In order to understand these revolutions, it is necessary to comprehend the concept of 'machine' of G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, inspired, in fact, by Lewis Mumford - Primitive Territorial machine, Barbaric Despotic machine, and Civilized Capitalist machine. However, these periodization and concepts of E. Soja have to be applied very cautiously in accordance with concrete historical sources, avoiding theoretical distortion on positivity of historical facts.

A Study of Controversy on Korean Economics and Academic Colonialism of Left-Wing Economics in the 1970~80s (1970-80년대 한국경제학 논쟁과 진보경제학의 학문적 식민주의 연구)

  • Jeong, Seong-gi
    • 사회경제평론
    • /
    • v.31 no.3
    • /
    • pp.93-130
    • /
    • 2018
  • This is the first study of the relation between the controversy on Korean Economics and the controversy on the capitalist social formation of Korea in the 1970-80. The main results of this study is as following: Almost all Korean Economists think 'Korean Economics' do not exist, but korean philosophers think Korean philosophy which is different from western philosophy do exist. So Korean economists tend to believe in the universal validity of western economics. In fact, Some Korean Economists began to argued about universal validity of American-Western economics and making Korean Economics in 1970s, the controversy ceased in the mid of 1980s. Left-wing Economists insisted that the right wing conservetive economics is imported from, mainly, U.S.A, Korea is academic colony of U.S.A. But progressive economics was also imported from Western world, or Soviet Union in the process of controvesy on Korean capitalist social formation in 1980s. It is necessary to retrospect and re-examine the controversy on Korean Economics and on Korean capitalist social formation to develop Economics of Korea.