• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.211-218
• /
• 2017

Background: Korea set up new diagnosis related group (DRG) as demonstration project in 2009. The new DRG was reformed in 2016. The main purpose of study is to identify the effect of reform on accuracy of payment. Methods: This study collected inpatient data from a hospital which contains medical information and cost from 2015 to 2016. The dependent variables were accuracy of total, bundled, unbundled payment, and payment for procedures. To analyze the effect of reform, this study conducted a multi-variate regression analysis adjusting for confounding variables. Results: The accuracy of payment increased after policy reform. The accuracy of total, bundled, unbundled payment, and payment for procedures significantly increased 3.90%, 2.92%, 9.03%, and 14.57% after policy reform, respectively. The accuracy of unbundled payment showed the largest increase among dependent variables. Conclusion: The results of study imply that policy reform enhanced the accuracy of payment. The government needs to monitor side effects such as increase of non-covered services. Also, leads to a considerable improvement in the value of cost unit accounting as a strategic play a role in development of DRG.

• 한국산업간호협회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.19-27
• /
• 2012

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.379-388
• /
• 2023

This study aims to propose the implementation of innovative payment models in Korea in order to promote the financial sustainability of the national health insurance system by reviewing the current status of the payment system in Korea and examining other countries' experiences with various innovative payment models. Korea primarily uses a fee-for-service payment system and additionally uses various payment systems such as case payment, per diem, and pay-for-performance. However, each payment system has its limitations. Many OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries have pointed out the limitations of existing payment systems and have been attempting various innovative payment models (e.g., add-on payment, bundled payment, and population-based payment). Therefore, it is essential for Korea to consider innovative payment models, such as a mixed payment model that takes into account the strengths and weaknesses of each payment system, and to design and pilot these models. This process requires stakeholders to work together to build a social consensus on the implementation of innovative payment systems and to refine legal and systematic aspects, develop an integrated health information system, and establish dedicated organizations and committees. These efforts towards innovative payment models will contribute to developing a sustainable health insurance system that ensures the public's health and well-being in Korea.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.178-184
• /
• 2020

Background: Korea set up a new diagnosis-related group as a demonstration project in 2009. The new diagnosis-related group was reformed in 2016. The main purpose of the study is to identify the effect of reform on coverage of national health insurance. Methods: This study collected inpatient data from a hospital that contains medical information and cost from 2015 July to 2016 June. The dependent variable was the coverage of national health insurance. The dependent variable was divided by total, internal medicine partition, surgical partition, and psychiatric partition. To analyze the effect of the reform, this study conducted an interrupted time series analysis. The final sample included 23,695. Results: The health insurance coverage of internal medicine has the highest, followed by surgery and psychiatry. The health insurance coverage of bundle payment is higher than that of unbundled payment. The proportion of bundled payment and non-benefit decreased and the proportion of unbundled payment increased. The coverage of national health insurance significantly increased after policy reform in internal medicine partition (p-value=0.0356). Conclusion: The results of the study imply that policy reform enhanced the coverage of national health insurance in internal medicine. The government needs to monitor side effects such as an increase of unbundled payment.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.69-105
• /
• 2020

의료보장제도에서 진료수가는 의료보장체계의 근간을 이루는 매우 중요한 요소이다. 국민건강보험법은 진료수가의 결정방식에 관하여 계약제를 채택하였고, 그 계약의 내용은 상대가치점수에 대한 점수당 단가를 정하는 것이다. 그에 따라 건강보험 요양급여비용은 매년마다 물가상승이나 경제 상황의 변화에 따라 조정된다. 반면, 의료급여의 경우, 의료급여법에서는 진료수가의 결정방식에 관한 내용을 규정하지 않고, 모든 사항을 보건복지부 장관에게 위임하고 있다. 그에 따라 보건복지부 장관은 2001년부터 혈액투석 치료에 관하여 정액수가제를 채택하고 있다. 이러한 혈액투석 정액수가제에 대해서 2017년 헌법소원이 제기되었고, 헌법재판소는 2020년 헌법소원 심판 청구를 모두 기각하였다. 이 글에서는, 위 헌법소원 사건을 중심으로 진료수가제도의 의미와 내용을 살펴보고, 이에 대한 헌법적 한계로 3가지 원칙을 제시한다. 그 원칙의 첫째는 법률유보의 원칙, 둘째는 포괄위임금지의 원칙, 셋째는 비례의 원칙이다. 그러한 관점에서 검토해 보면, 혈액투석 정액수가제는 상당히 위헌적인 제도로 판단된다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.390-397
• /
• 2021

선택형 공익직접지불제도는 농업인이 일정 수준 이상의 공익기능 증진 활동에 참여할 경우 경제적 유인을 제공하는 제도이다. 하지만 현행 선택형 공익직접지불제도는 과거의 직불제를 통합하는 수준에 그쳐 공익기능 증대에서 한계가 있다. 따라서 추진체계를 개편하여 농업의 공익기능에 대한 국민적 요구를 수용할 필요가 있다. 이에 본 연구는 계층화 분석적 의사결정법과 네트워크 분석적 의사결정법을 활용하여, 선택형 공익직접지불제도 추진체계의 우선순위를 설정하고 개편방안을 제시한다. 분석을 위하여 관련 전문가 51명을 대상으로 2020년 8월부터 약 두 달간 설문조사를 실시하였다. 분석결과 추진체계의 가장 중요한 목표는 효과성, 실행가능성, 농가수용성 중에서 효과성으로 분석되었다. 그리고 공익기능 증진을 위한 최적의 추진체계는 세부활동형, 묶음형, 포괄보조형 중 묶음형으로 분석되었다. 한편 묶음형의 경우 여러 세부활동 조합의 효과에 관한 연구가 부족하므로 농업환경보전 프로그램과 같은 기존의 사업을 활용하여 묶음형에 대한 시범사업을 진행할 필요가 있으며, 이에 대한 효과를 분석하여 체계적으로 정책을 수립할 필요가 있다. 본 연구는 선택형 공익직접지불제도 추진체계(안)의 평가를 통해 정책 추진 방향에 대한 지표를 제공함에 의의가 있다. 따라서 본 연구의 분석결과는 앞으로 공익직접지불제도 개편에 객관적인 근거로 활용될 것으로 기대된다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.135-147
• /
• 2016

Background: The voluntary diagnosis-related groups (DRG)-based payment system was introduced in 2002 and the government mandated participation in the DRG for all hospitals from July 2013. The main purpose of this study is to examine the independent effect of mandatory participation in DRG on various outcomes of patients. Methods: This study collected 1,809,948 inpatient DRG data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment database which contains medical information for all patients for the period 2007 to 2014 and examined patient outcomes such as length of stay (LOS), total medical cost, spillover, and readmission rate according to hospital size. Results: LOS of patients decreased after DRGs (large hospitals: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.97; small hospitals: aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.91-0.92). The total medical cost of patients increased after DRGs (large hospitals: aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.30; small hospitals: aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.21-1.23). The results reveals that spillover of patients increased after DRGs (large hospitals: aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.70-2.33; small hospitals: aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.16-1.20). Finally, we found that readmission rates of patients decreased significantly after DRGs (large hospitals: aOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.26-0.29; small hospitals: aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.56-0.63). Conclusion: The DRG payment system compared to fee-for-service payment in South Korea may be an alternative medical price policy which can reduce the LOS. However, government need to monitor inappropriate changes such as spillover increase. Since this study also is the results based on relatively simple surgery, insurer needs to compare or review bundled payment like new DRG for expansion of various inpatient-related diseases including internal medicine.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.35-43
• /
• 2013

Background: Diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) has recently been introduced in Korea as a demonstration project and it has aimed the improvement of accuracy in bundled payment instead of Diagnosis related group (DRG). The purpose of this study is to investigate that the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score as the severity classification of liver diseases is adequate for improving reimbursement of DPC. Methods: The subjects of this study were 329 patients of liver disease (Korean DRG ver. 3.2 H603) who had discharged from National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital which is target hospital of DPC demonstration project, between January 1, 2007 and July 31, 2010. We tested the cost differences by severity classifications which were DRG severity classification and clinical severity classification-MELD score. We used a multiple regression model to find the impacts of severity on total medical cost controlling for demographic factor and characteristics of medical services. The within group homogeneity of cost were measured by calculating the coefficient of variation and extremal quotient. Results: This study investigates the relationship between medical costs and other variables especially severity classifications of liver disease. Length of stay has strong effect on medical costs and other characteristics of patients or episode also effect on medical costs. MELD score for severity classification explained the variation of costs more than DRG severity classification. Conclusion: The accuracy of DRG based payment might be improved by using various clinical data collected by clinical situations but it should have objectivity with considering availability. Adequate compensation for severity should be considered mainly in DRG based payment. Disease specific severity classification would be an alternative like MELD score for liver diseases.