• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.13-31
• /
• 2019

Green spaces are recognised for the benefits. They bring to the quality of people's lives. However, since the 1980s there has been a general increase in poorly-managed green spaces. In an attempt to address this issue, green space policy has changed its focus on green space management through the gradual introduction of green space evaluation tools, such as the Green Flag Award (GFA). The GFA, as an established green space evaluation tool in the UK, reflects a shift in policy drivers of green spaces management. However, there is a lack of research investigating the contextualisation between a wide range of policy contexts and such green space evaluation tools (the GFA in this study). The aims of this study are therefore to explore the development of green space evaluation since the late 1990s, with respect to the growth of the GFA and its impact on other evaluation tools across the UK and several countries. To address the aims, this study employs in-depth literature reviews on UK green space policy mainly conducted by government. In addition, case studies are presented, focusing on the GFA and independent green space evaluation tools intrinsically derived from the GFA in the UK's cities and Nordic countries. Results show that based on the awareness of the severity of declining standards of green spaces, newly emerging policy arrangements have been adopted to address negative issues, which affect the standard of green spaces such as the transfer of responsibility for green space management, the implementation of Compulsory Competitive Tendering and ongoing budget cuts. Significantly, the GFA's indicators reflect the emerging changes of economic and social contexts associated with green spaces management where, in particular, the prospect of continuous budget cuts, which encourages communities to become involved in green space management. The GFA has widely contributed to leading such UK's cities and other countries to be able to create their independent green space evaluation tools in different approaches based on stakeholders' (mainly community) involvement in the decision-making process of green space evaluation. In conclusion, this study implies that successful green space evaluation tools do embody the value of green spaces and address drivers of emerging green space management with correspondence to the context of policy arrangements. Importantly, stakeholders have an opportunity to be involved in a partnership in the decision-making process through some green space evaluation tools. It is hoped that for well-managed green spaces this study will contribute valuable knowledge to our existing understanding of green space management in an era of austerity.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.15-34
• /
• 2019

Today, there is increasing recognition of the importance of urban regeneration for better public places. Urban parks as a public area play an important role in harnessing its positive impact on people's well-being: where the standards and funding of/for the parks are getting worse. There is however less a focus on policy approach to park regeneration in the country. Neverthless, a few UK's cases of such innovative park management(PM) has shown successful park regeneration based on policy support. Therefore, the aim of this research is to draw policy implications by exploring a case of successful park regeneration. To address the aim, this research conducts an in-depth case study of 'Manor Fields Park, UK', digging into its PM structure and PM body 'Green Estate Ltd' in relation to relevant policy. The data is mainly collected by interviews including a group interview. The analytical framework 'Place-keeping(PK)' and its six dimensions are employed to determine the characteristics of MFP's PM structure. Resultingly, there is a significant shift in the approach to PM which stresses the principle of long-term and self-sustaining structure led by a non-profit organisation and strong impacts of policy. In this context, PK highlights significant drivers for parks regeneration particularly in terms of policy implications: 1)providing policy support to encourage non-profit organisations in PM, 2)extending community involvement in decision-making processes, 3)promoting income generation by community groups, 4)shifting public awareness of shared responsibility for PM, 5)completing regular park maintenance assessment by community groups, and 6)delivering low-maintenance approaches to PM. To support these implications, PM structure for successful parks regeneration does meet a holistic and multi-dimensional approach of place-keeping underlined by understanding policy contexts and rethinking current status quo of PM. Addressing these implications will shed light on urban PM in an era of austerity and ultimately contribute to improving people's well-being.

• 동양고전연구
• /
• 제35호
• /
• pp.471-498
• /
• 2009

본고는 그림에 제하거나 그림을 대상으로 한 제화시(題畵詩)의 특성에 비추어볼 때 묵죽(墨竹)의 형상성이나 형상 과정이 잘 묘사될 수 있다고 여겨, 송대(宋代) 제화시를 수록한 대표적 제화시집인 "성화집(聲畵集)"에 실린 '대나무' 제화시를 통해 북송대 이후 묵죽화의 발전 양상과 그것의 도상학적 의미를 살펴본다. 묵죽화 발전 양상과 그 유형을 살펴보면, 북송대에는 당시 어부(御府)에 148축의 묵죽화가 있었다고 전해질 정도로 묵죽화가 성행했다. 화면 속에 등장하는 묵죽의 모습, 즉 그림 속의 '도상'은 와룡처럼 누운 횡죽(橫竹)이나 교룡처럼 굽은 우죽(紆竹)이 많이 등장하고, 특히 많은 대나무가 겨울에 서리를 맞고 서 있는 모습으로 나타난다. 송대에 오면 '대나무' 도상에 대한 인식은 유가적 이상형인 군자라는 보편적 인식과 더불어, 대나무를 자기표현의 한 수단으로 여기고 문인 사대부 특유의 문인성을 표현할 수 있는 대상으로 보게 된다. 그 결과, 전업화가들이 단청(丹靑)과 형사(形似)에 몰두해 그린 대나무가 아니라 문인 사대부 즉 자신들이 '묵죽'을 창작하고 감상하는 것을 최고로 여겼다. 묵죽에 대한 송대 문인사대부의 애호와 관심에는, 유가적 이상형인 군자 외에 시련에도 불요불굴하는 의지의 구현자이자, 부귀와 공명이 아니라 사회를 위해 도덕적인 책임과 문화적 과제를 온전히 수행할 수 있는 진정한 '문인성'의 체현자라는 인식이 그 바탕에 깔려 있었다고 할 수 있다.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권32호
• /
• pp.192-221
• /
• 2013

In order to deal with the current economic crisis, the U.S. government, as a part of its austerity fiscal policy, implemented a budget sequester. The sequester will hit the U.S. defense budget the hardest, and as a result will most likely put the security of the international community in jeopardy. The U.S. will have to cut 46 billion dollars from its original 525 billon defense spending in 2013. And by the year 2022, will have to cut 486.9 billion dollars. Such an astronomical decrease in the U.S. defense spending will inevitably burden the friendly nations. According to recent studies, pirate related incidents in Somalia, where piracy is most active, has declined from its 226 incidents to 76 incidents per year in 2012, a 66% drop from previous years'. However, piracy threats as well as those related to firearms still remain and thus participants of anti-piracy operations, namely the U.S., U.K., France, Canada, NCC, EUNAVFOR, and NATO, are facing a problem of declining forces. Considering the current situation as well as rising expectations from the international community, Republic of Korea, a supporter of NCC's maritime security operation, not to mention its foremost duty of securing its sea, is at a stage to re-examine its operational picture. Such action will be a good opportunity for Republic of Korea to build the trust and live up to the international community's expectation. To quote from the network theory, although in relation to other friendly nations participating in the anti-piracy operation, Republic of Korea currently remains at a single cell level, this opportunity will certainly develop Korea to a 'node' nation in which power and information would flow into. Through this expansion of operational capability, Republic of Korea will be able to exert more influence as a more developed nation. Currently however, not only is the single 4,500 ton class destroyer deployed in Somalia a limited unit to further expand the scale and amount of force projection in the area, but also the total of six 4,500 ton class destroyers ROK feet possess is at a high fatigue degree due to standard patrolling operations, midshipman cruise and the RIMPAC exercise. ROK fleet therefore must consider expanding the number of ships deployed along with either deploying combat support ships or constructing logistics support site in the African region. Thus, by expanding its operational capabilities and furthermore by abiding to the rightful responsibilities of a middle power nation, Republic of Korea will surely earn its respect among the members of the international community.

• 국제지역연구
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.3-27
• /
• 2018

이 논문은 쿠바의 기존의 발전 전략과 국가사회주의의 본질적 문제를 개선하기 위한 시장개혁 조처를 분석하고 발전전략으로서 산업정책의 효과성을 논의하였다. 국가사회주의의 계획 경제는 기본적으로 동기부여 체계(incentive system) 결여와 연성예산제약(soft budget constraint) 문제를 극복하기 쉽지 않다. 이 두 가지 문제는1990년대 주된 무역 대상국가인 소련과 동구 국가사회주의 국가의 몰락 초래하였다. 사회주의국가 블록의 몰락이후 쿠바는 식량부족, 에너지부족, 생필품 부족 등 심각한 경제위기에 봉착하였다. 이를 극복하기 위해 쿠바는 국가사회주의를 유지하는 수준에서 경제개혁을 단행하여 시장개혁 정책을 실행하고자 하였다. 특히, 수출주도형 산업정책으로 자유무역지대법을 통과시키고 강력한 외자 유치의 산업정책과 이를 통한 발전전략을 추진하였다. 그러나 마리엘특구 등 4개의 경제특구 설치에 의한 산업정책과 발전전략은 크게 성공을 거두지 못하였다고 평가되고 있다. 이는 기본적으로 이중적 고용과 임금, 그리고 이중화폐제도의 문제에서 비롯된다. 외국기업은 노동자를 쿠바의 고용청을 통해 간접적으로 고용하거나 해고할 수 있는 고용방식은 선진적인 인사 조직관리 기법 적용을 제한하게 되고 결국은 근로의욕 저하, 노동자의 생산성 하락과 효율성 하락으로 이어질 수 있다는 것이다. 또한 이중화폐제도로 인한 이중적 임금구조는 외국인투자기업에 인건비가 높이기 때문에 외국인이 쿠바에 적극적으로 직접투자를 꺼린 것이다. 또한 쿠바의 불균형 산업구조와 생산구조, 편중된 노동력 구조, 도심화와 농촌인구 슬림화, 농업생산의 중앙집권화 등으로 Lewis가 제안한 2부문모형인 아시아 농업주도 발전전략을 적용하기 쉽지 않아 보인다. 다시 말해, 쿠바는 산업정책을 통한 발전 전략을 수행하기 위해서 여러 가지 난점을 극복해야 할 것이다.