• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.64-70
• /
• 2009

목 적: 국소 진행되어 절제가 불가능한 췌장암에 있어 동시 항암화학 방사선 요법이 표준 요법으로 자리 잡아 왔다. 그러나 최근 들어 항암화학 단독 요법만으로도 좋은 결과를 보이는 연구 결과가 발표되고 있다. 이에 저자들은 국소 진행된 췌장암 환자들의 치료법에 따른 생존율 등을 비교하여 동시 항암화학 방사선 요법의 역할을 재조명하여 보고자하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2000년 1월부터 2008년 1월까지 인하대학교에서 절제 불가능한 췌장암으로 진단되어 치료를 받았던 55명의 환자를 대상으로 후향적 분석을 시행하였다. 동시 항암화학 방사선 요법은 5-FU에 기반한 항암화학 요법과 동시에 원발병소와 주위 림프절을 포함한 부분에 54 Gy (36~59.4 Gy)를 조사하였다. 항암화학 단독 요법은 gemcitabine단독 또는 5-FU와 병용하여 치료하였다. 치료 방법에 따른 치료반응과 전체 생존율 및 무진행생존율을 비교하였으며 예후인자들을 분석하였다. 결 과: 55명의 환자 중 동시 항암화학 방사선 요법을 받은 환자가 34명, 항암화학 단독 요법을 받은 환자가 21명이었다. 치료 방법에 따른 중앙 생존 기간은 각각 12개월, 11개월, 1년 생존율은 43%, 46%로 통계적으로 차이를 보이지 않았다. 중앙 무진행 생존기간은 각각 8개월, 5개월로 다소간 차이를 보였으나 통계적으로 의미있는 결과를 보이지는 않았다. 치료 반응도는 두 군 모두에서 완전 관해는 없었지만 부분 관해는 동시 항암화학 방사선 요법이 26%, 항암화학 단독 요법이 6%로 통계학적으로 의미 있는 차이를 보였다. 치료 중 독성은 동시 항암화학 방사선 요법이 장독성이 더 많았으나 다른 독성에는 차이가 없었다. 예후인자는 림프절 전이가 있는 경우, CA19-9이 1,000 U/ml 이상인 경우, 췌장암이 꼬리부분에 있는 경우가 나빴다. 결 론: 절제 불가능한 췌장암 치료에 있어서 동시 항암화학 방사선 요법이 항암화학 단독 요법에 비하여 무진행생존율을 향상 시키는 경향을 보였고, 치료 반응도에서도 더 좋은 결과를 보였다. 따라서 방사선 치료가 종양의 국소 제어에는 효과적인 것으로 생각된다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.200-209
• /
• 2018

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients. Materials and Methods: Between January 2011 and May 2015, 47 LAPC patients received CRT using SIB-IMRT. Prior to SIB-IMRT, 37 patients (78.7%) received induction chemotherapy (IC-CRT group) and remaining 10 patients (21.3%) did not received induction chemotherapy (CRT group). During SIB-IMRT, all patients received concomitant chemotherapy, with gemcitabine (n = 37) and capecitabine (n = 10). Results: At the time of analysis, 45 patients had died and 2 patients remained alive and the median follow-up time was 14.2 months (range, 3.3 to 51.4 months). For all patients, the median times of local progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 18.1, 10.3, and 14.2 months, respectively. The median time of LPFS between IC-CRT and CRT groups was similar (18.1 months vs. 18.3 months, p = 0.711). IC-CRT group had a higher trend in PFS (10.9 months vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.054) and had significantly higher OS (15.4 months vs. 9.5 months, p = 0.007) than CRT group. In multivariate analysis, the use of induction chemotherapy and tumor response were significant factors associated with OS (p < 0.05, each). During SIB-IMRT, toxicity of grade ≥3 was observed in 7 patients (14.9%) in all patients. Conclusions: CRT using SIB-IMRT is feasible and promising in LAPC patients.

• Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.36-42
• /
• 2013

배경 및 목적: Gemcitabine은 진행성 췌장암 환자의 치료에 우선적으로 사용되며, 다른 항암 약제에 비하여 상대적으로 독성이 적은 것으로 알려져 있다. 그러나 약제의 낮은 반응률과 상대적으로 높은 합병증의 발생률 때문에 많은 소화기암을 다루는 의사들은 췌장암을 가진 노인환자에서 항암치료를 꺼려하는 경항이 있다. 방법: 2007년에서 2010년 사이에 조직학적으로 췌장암을 진단받고, gemcitabine 항암요법을 시행받은 61명의 환자를 후향적으로 임상적, 검사실 및 영상학적 자료를 분석하였다. 환자는 65세 이상군 28명과 65세 미만군 38명으로 나누었다. Gemcitabine은 체표면적당 1,000 mg을 3주 동안 매주 30분에 걸쳐 투여하였고, 다른 항암제인 cisplatin, capecitabine, erlotinib 등을 병합 투여한 경우가 있었다. 결과: 환자의 평균 나이는 65세 이상군에서 71세, 65세 미만군에서 56세 였다. 진단 시 시행한 CA 19-9을 포함한 검사실검사는 두 군 간에 차이가 없었으며, gemcitabine 단독 항암요법을 시행한 경우는 65세 이상군에서 더 많았고(56.5 vs. 26.3%, p=0.029), 2차 혹은 3차 항암요법을 시행한 군은 65세 미만군에서 더 많았다(17.4 vs. 50.0%, p=0.014). 담관염이나 담관스텐트 유치는 양군에서 차이가 없었다. 결과: Gemcitabine 항암화학요법은 진행성 췌장암을 가진 노인환자에서 안전하게 사용할 수 있으며, 젊은 환자들에 견줄만한 치료 반응률과 무진행생존기간을 기대할 수 있을 것으로 예상된다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.243-247
• /
• 2006

목 적: 췌장암은 진단 시 절제 불가능한 진행된 병변을 갖는 경우가 많으므로 방사선치료 시 고식적 증상완화의 효과 및 예후를 알아보고 영향을 미치는 인자에 대해 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1984년 3월부터 2005년 2월까지 가톨릭대학교 강남성모병원에서 통증완화를 위한 고식적 방사선치료를 받은 절제 불가능한 췌장암 환자 중 추적조사가 가능한 37명을 대상으로 치료결과 및 관련인자에 대하여 후향적 분석을 시행하였다. 환자의 성별은 남자 22명(59.5%), 여자 15명(40.5%)이었으며, 연령은 30세에서 80세 사이로 중앙값 57세였다. 진단 시 12명(32.4%)에서 간전이가 있었고, 22명(59.5%)에서 임파절 전이가 있었다. 방사선치료는 종양 및 주변 임파절에서 $1{\sim}2\;cm$ 범위까지 $3,240{\sim}5,580\;cGy$ (중앙값 5,040 cGy)를 조사하였으며, 30명(81%)에서 항암화학요법을 병행하였는데 5-FU (fluorouracil) 단독을 투여한 경우가 21명이었고, 9명에서는 gemcitabine이 단독으로 또는 5-FU와 함께 투여되었다. 추적관찰기간은 1개월에서 44개월이었으며, 생존율 및 예후인자의 분석은 Kaplan-Meier 방법 및 Log-rank test를 이용하였다. 결 과: 전체환자의 평균 생존기간은 11개월, 중앙 생존기간은 8개월이었으며, 1년 생존율은 20%였다. 전체 환자 중 33명에서 치료에 대한 반응을 평가할 수 있었는데, 7명(21.2%)에서 양호, 22명(66.7%)에서 보통의 반응을 보여 87.9%의 증상완화율을 나타냈다. 방사선치료의 부작용은 경증 및 중등도의 오심, 구토, 소화불량이 14명(37.8%)에서 나타났으나 치료의 중단을 요하는 중증의 부작용은 관찰되지 않았다. 항암화학요법은 방사선치료와 병행여부에 따라 생존율이나 증상의 고식정도에는 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났으며(p>0.05), 약제의 종류에 따라 gemcitabine 약제가 주가된 군에서 중앙생존기간이 12개월로 5-FU를 단독으로 투여한 군의 5.5개월보다 높은 것으로 나타났으나 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지는 않았다(p>0.05). 예후에 영향을 미치는 인자로는 환자의 카르노프스키 활동도, 간전이 유무가 관련이 있는 것으로 나타났으며(p<0.05), 이외에 성별, 나이, 병변위치, 임파선 전이유무, CA 19-9 수치는 관련이 없는 것으로 나타났다(p>0.05). 결 론: 절제 불가능한 췌장암 환자에 있어서 방사선치료는 고식적 증상완화에 효과적이며, gemcitabine과 같은 항암화학요법과 더불어 다른 새로운 약제와 함께 생존율 향상에 역할을 할 것으로 기대되므로 앞으로 이에 대한 많은 연구가 필요할 것이다.

• 한국간담췌외과학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.70-75
• /
• 2023

Backgrounds/Aims: Locally advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) is associated with survival limited to a few months. Extended resections (ER) are occasionally performed in this group and outcomes remain inconclusive. This study assessed outcomes after ER for locally advanced GBC. Methods: Patients who underwent ER for GBC between 2011 and 2020 were reviewed. ER was defined as a major hepatectomy alone (n = 9), a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with or without minor hepatectomy (n = 3), a major hepatectomy with PD (HPD) (n = 3) or vascular resection and reconstruction (n = 4). We assessed 30-day morbidity, mortality, and 2-year overall survival (OS). Results: Among 19 patients, negative margins were achieved in 14 (73.6%). The 30-day mortality was 1/9 (11.1%) for a major hepatectomy, 0/3 (0%) for a minor HPD, 2/3 (66.7%) for a major HPD, and 1/4 (25.0%) for vascular resection. All short term survivors (< 6 months) (n=8) had preoperative jaundice and 6/8 (75.0%) underwent a major HPD or vascular resection. There were five (26.3%) long term survivors. The median OS in patients with and without preoperative jaundice was 4.1 months (0.7-11.1 months) and 13.7 months (12-30.4 months), respectively (p = 0.009) (2-year OS = 7% vs. 75%; p = 0.008). The median OS in patients who underwent a major hepatectomy alone or a minor HPD was 11.3 months (6.8-17.3 months) versus 1.4 months (0.3-4.1 months) (p = 0.02) in patients who underwent major HPD or vascular resection (2 year OS = 33% vs. not reached) (p = 0.010) respectively. Conclusions: In selected patients with GBC, when ER is limited to a major hepatectomy alone, or a minor HPD, acceptable survival can be achieved.

• IMMUNE NETWORK
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.55-67
• /
• 2005

Cancer vaccine is an active immunotherapy to stimulate the immune system to mount a response against the tumor specific antigen. Working as a stimulant to the body's own immune system, cancer vaccines help the body recognize and destroy targeted cancers and may help to shrink advanced tumors. Research is currently underway to develop therapeutic cancer vaccines. It is also possible to develop prophylactic vaccines in the future. The whole cell approach to eradicate cancer has used whole cancer cells to make vaccine. In an early stage of this approach, whole cell lysate or a mixture of immunoadjuvant and inactivated cancer cells has been used. Improved vaccines are being developed that utilize cytokines or costimulatory molecules to mount an attack against cancer cells. In case of melanoma, these vaccines are expected to have a therapeutic effect of vaccine. Furthermore, it is attempting to treat stomach cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and prostate cancer. Other vaccines are being developing that are peptide vaccine, recombinant vaccine and dendritic cell vaccine. Out of them, reintroduction of antigen-specific dendritic cells into patient and DNA vaccine are mostly being conducted. Currently, research and development efforts are underway to develop therapeutic cancer vaccine such as DNA vaccine for the treatment of multiple forms of cancers.

• 한국간담췌외과학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.114-119
• /
• 2023

A 51-year-old male patient had four times of massive hematochezia episode three days before arrival. Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level was extremely elevated. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography identified 5.7 cm sized periampullary duodenal cancer with regional metastatic lymph nodes and vascular invasion to aberrant right hepatic artery, main portal vein, and superior mesenteric vein. Diagnosed as duodenal adenocarcinoma through endoscopic biopsy, 16 times of FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan) was conducted. The regimen changed to XELOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatine), four times of administration was done, and the CA19-9 level dramatically decreased. The tumor decreased to 2.1 cm. After R0 laparoscopic pylorus preserving pancreatoduodenectomy, no adjuvant therapy was given. No sign of recurrence or metastasis was reported, and the patient reached complete remission after five years. We reported a case where neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced duodenal adenocarcinoma was shown to be effective.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권23호
• /
• pp.10165-10169
• /
• 2015

Background: Megestrol acetate (MA) is a steroid origin medicine often used for control of cachexia in oncologic palliative care. Thrombosis is a common problem in oncology patients. One question is whether MA can cause thrombosis. This retrospective, registry-based analysis was therefore conducted to assess thrombotic processes in oncology patients using MA concurrent with chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: Data on oncology patients at the metastatic stage using MA were obtained from the archives of our center. Outcomes of patients were evaluated for thromboembolic events (VTEs) during treatment. Results: Ninety-seven oncology patients with a median age of 62 (33-84) years were included. During the median follow-up of 17 months, 58 (59.8%) died leaving 39 (31.2%) still alive. Median overall survival (OS) was 19 months (6-180). Mean time of MA use was 8.69 months(${\pm}3.53$), with a median dose of 160mg (range 160-480mg). Eleven VTEs were detected after MA use, 4 of these in pancreatic cancer cases. The patients with thrombosis non-significantly had worse OS, than those without thrombosis (p=0.106). Conclusions: This trial revealed that the 11.3% of all patients developed thrombosis,who had been treated with MA and chemotherapy concomittantly. There was no statistically significant difference regarding to occurrence of thrombotic process, among the patients receiving different chemotherapy regimens with MA concomittantly. Pancreatic cancer seemed to be related to thrombosis rather than MA use.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2020

Splenic hilar lymph node dissection has been the standard treatment for advanced proximal gastric cancer. Splenectomy is typically performed as part of this procedure. However, splenectomy has some disadvantages, such as increased risk of postoperative complications, especially pancreatic fistula. Moreover, patients who underwent splenectomy are vulnerable to potentially fatal infection caused by encapsulated bacteria. Furthermore, several studies have shown an association of splenectomy with cancer development and increased risk of thromboembolic events. Therefore, splenectomy should be avoided if it does not confer a distinct oncological advantage. Most studies that compared patients who underwent splenectomy and those who did not failed to demonstrate the efficacy of splenectomy. Based on the results of a randomized controlled trial conducted in Japan, prophylactic dissection with splenectomy is no longer recommended in patients with gastric cancer with no invasion of the greater curvature. However, patients with greater curvature invasion or those with remnant gastric cancer still need to undergo splenectomy to facilitate splenic hilar node dissection. Spleen-preserving splenic hilar node dissection is a new procedure that may help delink splenic hilar node dissection and splenectomy. In this review, we examine the evidence pertaining to the efficacy and disadvantages of splenectomy. We discuss the possibility of spleen-preserving surgery for prophylactic splenic hilar node dissection to overcome the disadvantages of splenectomy.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권13호
• /
• pp.5285-5288
• /
• 2015

Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has been reported to be associated with inferior prognosis in hepatocellular and pancreatic carcinoma cases, but has not been studied with respect to non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of HBV infection in advanced NSCLC patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort of 445 advanced NSCLC patients was recruited at our hospital from January 1, 2003 until August 30, 2014. Serum HBV markers were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. COX proportional hazards analysis was used to evaluate associations of HBV infection with overall survival (OS). Results: Of 445 patients who were qualified for the study, 68 patients were positive for HBsAg, also considered as HBV infection. Patients in HBsAg negative group were found to have better OS (12.6 months [12.2-12.9]) than those in HBsAg positive group (11.30 months [10.8-11.9]; p=0.001). Furthermore, COX multivariate analysis identified HBV infection as an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 0.740 [0.560, 0.978], p=0.034). Conclusions: Our study found that HBsAg-positive status was an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with advanced NSCLC. Future prospective studies are required to confirm our findings.