• Title/Summary/Keyword: WindCube LIDAR

Search Result 5, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Comparative Validation of WindCube LIDAR and Remtech SODAR for Wind Resource Assessment - Remote Sensing Campaign at Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (풍력자원평가용 윈드큐브 라이다와 렘텍 소다의 비교.검증 - 포항가속기 원격탐사 캠페인)

  • Kim, Hyun-Goo;Chyng, Chin-Wha;An, Hae-Joon;Ji, Yeong-Mi
    • Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society
    • /
    • v.31 no.2
    • /
    • pp.63-71
    • /
    • 2011
  • The remote-sensng campaign was performed at the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory where is located in a basin 6km inland from Yeongil Bay. The campaign aimed uncertainty assessment of Remtech PA0 SODAR through a mutual comparison with WindCube LIDAR, the remote-sensing equipment for wind resource assessment. The joint observation was carried out by changing the setup for measurement heights three times over two months. The LIDAR measurement was assumed as the reference and the uncertainty of SODAR measurement was quantitatively assessed. Compared with LIDAR, the data availability of SODAR was about half. The wind speed measurement was fitted to a slope of 0.94 and $R^2$ of 0.79 to the LIDAR measurement. However, the relative standard deviation was about 17% under 150m above ground level. Therefore, the Remtech PA0 SODAR is judged to be unsuitable for the evaluation of wind resource assessment and wind turbine performance test, which require accuracy of measurement.

Comparative Validation of WindCube LIDAR and Scintec SODAR for Wind Resource Assessment - Remote Sensing Campaign at Jamsil (풍력자원평가용 윈드큐브 라이다와 씬텍 소다의 비교.검증 - 잠실 원격탐사 캠페인)

  • Kim, Hyun-Goo;Kim, Dong-Hyuk;Jeon, Wan-Ho;Choi, Hyun-Jeong
    • New & Renewable Energy
    • /
    • v.7 no.2
    • /
    • pp.43-50
    • /
    • 2011
  • The only practical way to measure wind resource at high-altitude over 100 m above ground for a feasibility study on a high-rise building integrated wind turbine might be ground-based remote sensing. The remote-sensing campaign was performed at a 145 m-building roof in Jamsil where is a center of metropolitan city Seoul. The campaign aimed uncertainty assessment of Leosphere WindCube LIDAR and Scintec MPAS SODAR through a mutual comparison. Compared with LIDAR, the data availability of SODAR was about 2/3 at 550 m altitude while both showed over 90% under 400 m, and it is shown that the data availability decrease may bring a distortion of statistical analysis. The wind speed measurement of SODAR was fitted to a slope of 0.92 and $R^2$ of 0.90 to the LIDAR measurement. The relative standard deviation of wind speed difference and standard deviation of wind direction difference were evaluated to be 30% and 20 degrees, respectively over the whole measurement heights.

LIDAR Analysis Program of Wind Resource Measurement KIER-$ShadeFree^{TM}$ (풍력자원조사 라이다 분석 프로그램 KIER-$LidarWind^{TM}$)

  • Kim, Hyun-Goo;Jeong, Tae-Yoon;Jang, Moon-Seok;Jeon, Wan-Ho;Yoon, Seong-Wook
    • 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2010.11a
    • /
    • pp.190.2-190.2
    • /
    • 2010
  • LIDAR는 레이저를 대기에 송출하여 미세먼지의 이동에 의한 도플러 위상차를 검출함으로써 3차원 풍속벡터를 측정하는 원격탐사 장비로, 한국에너지기술연구원은 국내최초로 WindCube LIDAR를 도입하여 운영 중에 있다. LIDAR의 장점은 이동성, 설치의 편리성 외에도 현재까지 풍황탑이 모든 범위를 측정하지 못한 풍력발전기 블레이드 회전면 최고 높이인 지면 150m 까지의 풍속분포를 상세하게 측정할 수 있다는 특장점이 있다. WindCube LIDAR는 총 10개의 측정 고도를 설정할 수 있으며 1Hz로 원시자료를 획득하여 10분 평균자료로 저장한다. 이러한 측정자료를 통하여 기존 기상탑에서 불가능하였던 풍속분포의 정확한 이해와 난류특성의 파악이 가능하게 되었으나 반대급부로 급증한 측정자료의 정리와 분석에 많은 시간과 노력이 필요하게 되었다. 이에 한국에너지기술연구원에서는 LIDAR 측정자료의 가공 및 분석에 편리성을 제공하기 위해 KIER-$LidarWind^{TM}$ 프로그램을 개발하였으며, 2차원 등치선도 및 3차원 풍속분포 그래프를 시각함으로써 입체적인 가공 및 분석이 가능하도록 하였다.

  • PDF

Scanning Rayleigh Doppler Lidar for Wind Profiling Based on Non-polarized Beam Splitter Cube Optically Contacted FPI

  • Zheng, Jun;Sun, Dongsong;Chen, Tingdi;Zhao, Ruocan;Han, Yuli;Li, Zimu;Zhou, Anran;Zhang, Nannan
    • Current Optics and Photonics
    • /
    • v.2 no.2
    • /
    • pp.195-202
    • /
    • 2018
  • A Scanning Rayleigh Doppler lidar for wind profiling based on a non-polarized beam splitter cube optically contacted FPI is developed for wind measurement from high troposphere to low stratosphere in 5-35 km. Non-polarized beam splitter cube optically contacted to the FPI are used for a stable optical receiver. Zero Doppler shift correction is used to correct for laser or FPI frequency jitter and drift and the timing sequence is designed. Stability of the receiver for Doppler shift discrimination is validated by measuring the transmissions of FPI in different days and analyzed the response functions. The maximal relative wind deviation due to the stability of the optical receiver is about 4.1% and the standard deviation of wind velocity is 1.6% due to the stability. Wind measurement comparison experiments were carried out in Jiuquan ($39.741^{\circ}N$, $98.495^{\circ}E$), Gansu province of China in 2015, showing good agreement with radiosonde result data. Continuous wind field observation was performed from October 16th to November 12th and semi-continuous wind field of 19 nights are presented.

Uncertainty Analysis on Wind Speed Profile Measurements of LIDAR by Applying SODAR Measurements as a Virtual True Value (가상적 참값으로써 소다 측정자료를 적용한 라이다에 의한 풍속연직분포 측정의 불확도 분석)

  • Kim, Hyun-Goo;Choi, Ji-Hwi
    • Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society
    • /
    • v.30 no.4
    • /
    • pp.79-85
    • /
    • 2010
  • The uncertainty in WindCube LIDAR measurements, which are specific to wind profiling at less than 200m above ground levelin wind resource assessments, was analyzed focusing on the error caused by its volume sampling principle. A two-month SODAR measurement campaign conducted in an urban environment was adopted as the reference wind profile assuming that various atmospheric boundary layer shapes had been captured. The measurement error of LIDAR at a height z was defined as the difference in the wind speeds between the SODAR reference data, which was assumed to be a virtually true value, and the numerically averaged wind speed for a sampling volume height interval of $z{\pm}12.5m$. The pattern of uncertainty in the measurement was found to have a maximum in the lower part of the atmospheric boundary layer and decreased with increasing height. It was also found that the relative standard deviations of the wind speed error ratios were 6.98, 2.70 and 1.12% at the heights of 50, 100 and 150m above ground level, respectively.