• 제목/요약/키워드: Wheelchair ergometer exercise

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.017초

융복합을 활용한 휠체어 트레드밀과 암에르고미터 점증부하운동검사 시 심폐기능, 운동자각도 및 젖산농도 비교 (A Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Function, RPE, and Blood Lactate following in Wheelchair Treadmill and Arm Ergometer GXT Test through Convergence)

  • 장홍영;김종혁
    • 디지털융복합연구
    • /
    • 제14권9호
    • /
    • pp.553-561
    • /
    • 2016
  • 본 연구는 비장애인 휠체어 농구 선수 11명을 대상으로 휠체어트레드밀과 암 에르고미터의 점증부하운동검사 시 심폐기능, 운동자각도 및 젖산 농도를 비교하는데 목적이 있다. 연구방법으로는 휠체어트레드밀과 암 에르고미터의 점증부하운동검사 시 호흡가스분석기와 무선 심박수 측정기를 사용하여 심폐기능을 알아보았으며, 보그 스케일을 이용하여 운동자각도를 측정하였고, 젖산 분석기를 사용하여 안정 시, 운동직후, 회복기 2분, 4분, 6분, 10분의 혈중 젖산 농도를 측정하였다. 측정된 데이터는 SPSS 18.0 프로그램을 통하여 종속 t-검증(paired t-test)을 실시하여 분석하였고 통계적 유의수준은 .05로 설정하였다. 이 연구를 통하여 얻어진 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 심폐기능 변인 중 최대산소섭취량은 암 에르고미터가 높게 나타났으며, 호흡교환율은 휠체어트레드밀이 높게 나타났으며, 최대 심박수는 휠체어트레드밀이 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 주관적 운동 강도에서는 종료 점에서 암 에르고미터에서 높게 나타났다. 셋째, 혈중 젖산 농도는 운동 직후 암 에르고미터에서 높게 나타났다.

척수손상으로 인한 하반신마비 환자의 최대운동부하시 생리학적 반응 (Physiological Responses to Maximal Exercise Loading in Spinal Cord Injured Paraplegia)

  • 유병규;정낙수
    • 한국전문물리치료학회지
    • /
    • 제6권2호
    • /
    • pp.56-66
    • /
    • 1999
  • The purpose of this study focused how to show physiological responses comparing exercise group and non exercise group for progressive maximal wheelchair ergometer exercise loading in complete paraplegia. It also examined the various factors which would be influenced physiological responses. Sixteen subjects have been investigated in this study, and the subjects are divided into two groups as follows: 1) exercise group (7 subjects) 2) non exercise group (9 subjects). Each test was terminated by physical exhaustion and/or an inability to maintain a flywheel velocity. The results were as follows: 1) No difference was noted in pulmonary function test between two groups. 2) $\dot{v}$ Emax value during maximal exercise was significantly different between the groups (p<0.05). The mean $\dot{v}$ Emax of exercise group was $69.67{\ell}/min$, non exercise group was $41.47{\ell}/min$. 3) $\dot{v}$ $O_2max$(${\ell}/min$) value during maximal exercise was significantly different between the groups (p<0.05). The mean $\dot{v}$ $O_2max$(${\ell}/min$) of exercise group was $1.72{\ell}/min$, non exercise group was $1.15{\ell}/min$. 4) $\dot{v}$ $O_2$ max(ml/kg/min) value during maximal exercise was significantly different between the groups (p<0.05). The mean $\dot{v}$ $O_2max$($ml/kg{\cdot}min$) of exercise group was $25.99ml/kg{\cdot}min$, non exercise group was $18.61{\ell}/min$. 5) Maximal heart rate(HRmax) value during maximal exercise was significantly different between the groups (p<0.05). The mean HRmax of exercise group was 180.43 beats/min, non exercise group was 175.00 beats/min. 6) $\dot{v}\;E/\dot{v}\;O_2$ value during maximal exercise was not significantly different between the groups (p>0.05). The mean $\dot{v}\;E/\dot{v}\;O_2$ of exercise group was $36.36{\ell}/{\ell}\;O_2$, non exercise group was $45.46{\ell}/{\ell}\;O_2$. Considering the results which explore the exercise group with paraplegia has shown the maximal aerobic power compared with non exercise group, regular and consistent physical training is highly assumed as a main factor to improve cardiopulmonary fitness.

  • PDF