• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.123-140
• /
• 2007

This study focuses on establishing theoretically-reasonable framework of evaluation areas and items for the informatization program and analyzing the weights for each area and item by means of the AHP. To obtain the goal of this research, firstly, based on broadly reviewing previous literature and logical reasoning, the evaluation criteria were Identified and conceptualized, which were 3 evaluation phases, 5 evaluation areas, and 22 evaluation items. Secondly, The data used for calculating the weight values for the evaluation criteria were collected from 48 academic and practical experts in the field of the informatization program promotion using internet survey. Thirdly, the relative weights among evaluation phases, evaluation areas, and its items were derived by AHP analysis. The findings of this study are thought not only to be useful as a practical guideline in performing evaluating the informatization program but also to provide significant basis for constructing the theoretical framework of evaluating method and management of the informatization program.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.209-217
• /
• 2023

In this study, the evaluation items related to the effectiveness evaluation of the LVC (Live, Virtual, Constructive) training system of the Air Force were derived and the weights of each item were analyzed. The LVC training system evaluation items for AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) analysis were divided into three layers, and according to the level, 3 items were derived at level 1, 11 items at level 2, and 33 items at level 3. For weight analysis of evaluation items, an AHP-based pairwise comparison questionnaire was conducted for Air Force experts related to the LVC training system. As a result of the survey, related items such as (1) Achievement of education and training goals (53.8%), (1.2) Large-scale mission and operational performance (25.5%), and (1.2.1) Teamwork among training participants (19.4%) was highly rated. Also, it was confirmed that the weights of evaluation items were not different for each expert group, that is, the priority for importance was evaluated in the same order between the policy department and the working department. Through these analysis results, it will be possible to use them as evaluation criteria for new LVC-related projects of the Air Force and selection of introduction systems.

• 한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경
• /
• 제20권7호
• /
• pp.13-22
• /
• 2015

In this study, we have developed the performance evaluation model for the optimal soil remediation technology selection. Performance evaluation model is composed in the evaluation of two steps. In the first stage, the candidate technologies are derived according to the conditions of drilling, type and concentration of pollutants, and the saturated/unsaturated of target site. In the second stage, each individual candidate technology is evaluated by performance evaluation model. The performance evaluation model has 5 groups of evaluation items and 12 evaluation items which have their own evaluation index and their own weights through the AHP approach surveying 40 experts. From the case study of actual design cases, the applicability of the performance evaluation model was confirmed.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.57-71
• /
• 1988

Checklist method is rapid and comprehensive to evaluate in practice. Check items are commonly rated by subjective utility function; i.e., evaluator's significant judgment. Since human judgment includes fuzziness (vagueness) inherently in spite of its significance, fuzzy set theory is useful in this case. The paper illustrates a evaluation method using fuzzy checklist where check items are rated as fuzzy numbers. Pairwise comparison data is used to determine the weights of check items, since it has comparative advantage for human's fuzzy judgment. Sample of BASIC program is provided for microcomputer. When uncertainty is due to subjectivity or imprecision of data, this method can be applied to practical problems widely.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.55-83
• /
• 1995

This paper addresses three central decision-making problems frequently encountered in developing evaluation checklists for ex-post evaluation of R&D projects at private R&D centers: 1) what kind of evaluation elements and factors should be included in the evaluation forms\ulcorner 2) how much weight should be assigned to each evaluation factor and element\ulcorner and 3) could the same evaluation elements and factors with weights be applied all the project type(research, development, and engineering)\ulcorner To answer these questions, we identified the evaluation elements/factors based on the review of relevant literature and measured the perceptions of researchers, R&D managers, and top managements of the three private R&D centers to get the information about the importance levels of the elements and the weights of the factors for each of the three project types. The findings include that 1) all the evaluation elements derived from the literature exhibited high importance levels, and 2) the importance levels of the elements and the weights of the factors were quite varied along the project types. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings for ex-post evaluation of R&D projects are discussed.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.109-120
• /
• 2004

In large scale complex system such as a nuclear power plant, it is important to select guidelines and/or checklist to evaluate the system performance, especially human performance for visual information while the number of evaluation items of the guidelines and checklist is voluminous. This paper presents the methodology and experiment for the relative weights or priority selection of evaluation items on the advanced information display of main control room in a nuclear power plant. To summarize this, 1) many human factors guidelines of Visual Display Terminal(VDT) displays are collected, 2) the collected guidelines are integrated and unified based on some rules in a way to avoid confusion or errors about work performances of operator groups, 3) using the unified guidelines, the more important items are defined when the advanced information indexes are applied by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). For employing the AHP, the decisions and response of many human factors evaluation specialists in this field are collected to get the priority order of the evaluation items of VDT. The result of this paper will be applied for the evaluation of the usability of next generation of nuclear power plant which is focused on the visual information display on VDT.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2002

A performance evaluation model of an R&D module in the quality management system for M Company Is constructed using QFD. The company produces telecommunication devices and employs the performance evaluation model based on ISO 9000 family. However, the model has some problems, one of them is that all check items are regarded as equally important Customer requirements are gathered from internal customers and QFD is utilized to obtain weights for each check item.

• 한국습지학회지
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.21-35
• /
• 2009

하천환경정비의 방향을 제시하기 위해서는 하천의 자연도를 평가하는 것이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 박봉진 등이 제안한 하천자연도평가법을 개선하여 평가항목별 가중치를 산정하고, 계층분석과정(AHP)을 적용하였다. 토목공학과 환경공학을 전공한 83명의 전문가 집단을 구성하고 설문조사를 시행하여, 하천자연도평가법의 평가항목별 가중치를 산정하였다. 가중치 산정결과 총 14개 평가항목 중에서 수질, 흐름의 다양성, 저수로변 식생, 수로의 굴곡, 홍수터의 식생, 저수로 폭 다양성, 하상재료의 다양성 등 7개 항목의 가중치가 높았다. 개선된 하천자연도평가법을 회야강, 안양천, 아미천에 적용하였고, 자연성이 훼손된 구간에 대한 변별력이 있는 것으로 판단되었다. 개선된 하천자연도평가법을 하천환경정비사업에서 사업구간을 선정하는 방법으로 활용할 수 있다.

• 한국방재학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국방재학회 2008년도 정기총회 및 학술발표대회
• /
• pp.703-706
• /
• 2008

현재 유역종합치수계획의 구조적 홍수방어시설의 평가는 다차원홍수피해액 산정방법에 의해 수행되어지고 있으며, 건설교통부(2004)에서 제시한 경제성 분석과 안전 위험성, 지속 가능성을 고려하여 계층화분석(AHP)기법을 통하여 최적대안이 선정되고 있다. 그 결과 홍수방어시설의 정책성 분석의 결여로 인해 사회적 문제, 민원발생, 정부기관간의 마찰 등 많은 문제가 발생하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 이같은 문제를 해결하기 위해 유역종합 치수계획을 위한 계층화분석(AHP)기법의 정책성 평가의 계층구조를 재구성하고, 구조적 홍수방어시설의 최적대안 선정을 위해 정책적 세부 평가항목별 가중치를 설정하여 계층화분석(AHP)기법에 적용할 수 있는 정책적 평가기법을 개발하였다. 정책적 평가기법을 개발하기 위해서 치수사업의 정책성 평가 항목과 가중치 설정에 대해 전문가 설문조사를 실시하였다. 설문조사 결과와 한국개발연구원에서 제시한 국가 공공사업의 예비타당성 조사를 위한 가중치를 비교 분석하였다. 치수경제성에 높은 가중치를 부여하였던 과거와 달리 설문조사 결과는 치수경제성이 중요하지만 정책성 분석 역시 중요하다는 인식의 변화와 기본 평가항목을 추가하여 정책성 분석의 세부 평가항목의 다양성이 필요하다고 나타났다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제23권7호
• /
• pp.121-129
• /
• 2018

Since 2005, POSCO has been conducting continuous innovation activities using its own innovation methodology, QSS + (Quick Six Sigma Plus). Recently, the effectiveness of QSS + has been decreased owing to the different needs and purposes for each group. The purpose of this study is to compare the weights of the QSS + factors using AHP analysis. QSS + factors consist of two levels. The high level consists of 7 items : 'Master Plan, Waste Zero Activity, Daily Improvement Activity, Talent Development, Project Activity, Initiative/Encouragement activity'. The low level consists of 3 items '5S, My Machine, My M&S' for Daily Improvement Activity. As a result, we found that there was a difference between the weights of the four groups. We suggest the effective QSS + directions to improve the quality of POSCO.