• 제목/요약/키워드: Voice Synthesis

검색결과 103건 처리시간 0.018초

한글 단어의 음성 인식 처리에 관한 연구 (A Study on Processing of Speech Recognition Korean Words)

  • 남기훈
    • 문화기술의 융합
    • /
    • 제5권4호
    • /
    • pp.407-412
    • /
    • 2019
  • 본 논문에서는 한글 단어 단위의 음성 인식 처리 기술을 제안한다. 음성 인식은 마이크와 같은 센서를 사용하여 얻은 음향학적 신호를 단어나 문장으로 변환시키는 기술이다. 대부분의 외국어들은 음성 인식에 있어서 어려움이 적은 편이다. 그에 반면, 한글의 모음과 받침 자음 구성이어서 음성 합성 시스템으로부터 얻은 문자를 그대로 사용하기에는 부적절하다. 기존 구조의 음성 인식 기술을 개선해야만 보다 정확하게 단어를 인식할 수 있다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 기존 방식의 음성 인식구조에 새로운 알고리즘을 추가하여 음성 인식률을 높이게 하였다. 먼저 입력된 단어를 전처리 과정을 수행한 후 결과를 토큰 처리한다. 레벤스테인 거리 알고리즘과 해싱 알고리즘에서 처리된 결과 값을 조합한 후 자음 비교 알고리즘을 거쳐 표준 단어를 출력한다. 최종 결과 단어를 표준화 테이블과 비교하여 존재하면 출력하고 존재하지 않으면 테이블에 등록하도록 하였다. 실험 환경은 스마트폰 응용 프로그램을 개발하여 사용하였다. 본 논문에서 제안된 구조는 기존 방식에 비해 인식률의 성능이 표준어는 2%, 방언은 7% 정도 향상되었음을 보였다.

다산(茶山) 우화시(寓話詩)의 확장(擴張)과 전이(轉移) -<오즉어행>과 <리노행>을 중심(中心)으로- (Expansion and Transition of Tasan's Allegoric Poetry)

  • 이경아
    • 고전문학과교육
    • /
    • 제15호
    • /
    • pp.329-353
    • /
    • 2008
  • Tasan Jeong Yak-yong is great scholar, who makes a synthesis of Sil-hak[實學, Practical Science of Korea], reformer of society, and a poet in the Joseon Dynasty. He expressed contradiction and conflict of those days by intellectual language, and reperceived basic ideology of the Joseon society. Also he theorized dissatisfaction of the people about those days and its system as form of religion. We can divide Tasan's life into two times. The first part is his ages 16~39 in the period of Jeong-jo(1777~1800). The second part is in the period of Sun-jo(1801~1834). In this period, he was exiled into Gang-jin for 17 years. After banishment, he lived a quiet life for the rest of his life in his hometown. His allegoric poetry were written in this second period. The special feature of allegoric poetry is strong satire. An allegory would be that is 'king's ear', which the barber has sight, or the barber's voice, which has divulged king's secret among the bamboos. Otherwise it would be that is the sound 'king's ear is donkey's ear' in the bamboos. This sound is divulging of the true donkey's ear. It doesn't travel to audiences, but travels trough wind in the bamboos. The narration exists just as story that barber can't stand to keep silence about king's secret. There are exposure of true and critical motive as allegoric expression. Tasan's allegoric poetry stand on the basis of his love for the people. Also there reveals his thought deeply with an enormous amount of reading and self-communion. Moreover there are his warm mind with his sharp insight in which captures alive lives as allegoric materials. Most of allegoric poetry satirize actuality of those days to make an excuse for external distinguishing marks of animals and plants. However Tasan's poetry are different from them. After he grasped serious problems from his contemporary actuality, and then choosed allegoric media to express correctly. Because he grasped the special features of lives after minute observation, he could exposure controversial point of the actual. His sharp insight was not limited to allegoric media. He noticed his period and the current of his society sensitively. It made his allegoric poetry as important materials to make us to know the condition of the people in the Joseon Dynasty. Tasan's allegoric poetry is inherited by Baek Seok[白石, 1912~1995] as regular juvenile literature. Baek Seok's juvenile stories are the results of expansion and transition for Tasan's allegoric poetry. Allegoric poetry was the shout of barber to prosecute about social irregularities and contradiction, and the sound of the bamboos to travel moaning of the people in the past. Now allegoric poetry create new emotion to make us to speculate ourselves with our surrounding. This changes are caused by special feature of allegoric poetry as a form to reflect our general lives.

Feedback on Peer Feedback in EFL Composing: Four Stories

  • Huh, Myung-Hye;Lee, Jang Ho
    • 영어영문학
    • /
    • 제57권6호
    • /
    • pp.977-998
    • /
    • 2011
  • The purpose of this study is to investigate prospective teachers' perceptions of the peer review comments readily available to them during the writing process in a teacher training class. Given these needs, we employ a qualitative method of inquiry giving voice to the learner's own view of peer feedback. The data we wish to consider is first-person narratives elicited from four EFL college students, who are prospective teachers of English. With regard to the EFL students' narrative considered here, all were attentive to the feedback they received. Moreover, the way in which these EFL writers talk about peer response activity reflects that they still welcome peer feedback because of the benefits to be accrued from it. Although this study, covering only four EFL students in total, can hardly be considered conclusive, we attempt to offer a synthesis of their stories. First of all, students indicate that they received responses from "authentic readers" (Mittan 1989, 209). We do note, consequently, that students gain a clear understanding of readers' needs by receiving feedback on what they did well and on what seems unclear. Perhaps the greater effect of peer feedback claimed by these students is that they take active roles in utilizing peer comments. Since they feel uncertain about the validity of their classmates' responses, students feel that they have autonomy over their own text and can make their own decisions on whether they should accept their peer comments or not. This contrasts with their treatment of teacher comments that they accept begrudgingly even if they disagree with them. Four EFL writers talked a lot, typically in a positive way, about peer response to their writing, yet they have expressed reservations about the extent to which they should put any credence in comments offered by their fellow students. Perhaps this is because their fellow students are still developing writers and EFL learners. In turn, they were sometimes reluctant to accept the peers' comments. Thus, in EFL contexts, L1 use can be suggested during peer feedback sessions. In particular, we have come to feel that L1 use enables both reviewers and receivers to have more productive peer review experiences. Additionally, we need to train students not "to see peer feedback as potentially bad advice" (Silva et al. 2003, 111). Teachers should focus on training students to utilize their peers' comments. Without such training, students will either ignore feedback or fail to use it constructively.