• Title/Summary/Keyword: Visual Geometry Group Network(VGGNet)

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

A Study on the Outlet Blockage Determination Technology of Conveyor System using Deep Learning

  • Jeong, Eui-Han;Suh, Young-Joo;Kim, Dong-Ju
    • Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
    • /
    • v.25 no.5
    • /
    • pp.11-18
    • /
    • 2020
  • This study proposes a technique for the determination of outlet blockage using deep learning in a conveyor system. The proposed method aims to apply the best model to the actual process, where we train various CNN models for the determination of outlet blockage using images collected by CCTV in an industrial scene. We used the well-known CNN model such as VGGNet, ResNet, DenseNet and NASNet, and used 18,000 images collected by CCTV for model training and performance evaluation. As a experiment result with various models, VGGNet showed the best performance with 99.03% accuracy and 29.05ms processing time, and we confirmed that VGGNet is suitable for the determination of outlet blockage.

Analysis of unfairness of artificial intelligence-based speaker identification technology (인공지능 기반 화자 식별 기술의 불공정성 분석)

  • Shin Na Yeon;Lee Jin Min;No Hyeon;Lee Il Gu
    • Convergence Security Journal
    • /
    • v.23 no.1
    • /
    • pp.27-33
    • /
    • 2023
  • Digitalization due to COVID-19 has rapidly developed artificial intelligence-based voice recognition technology. However, this technology causes unfair social problems, such as race and gender discrimination if datasets are biased against some groups, and degrades the reliability and security of artificial intelligence services. In this work, we compare and analyze accuracy-based unfairness in biased data environments using VGGNet (Visual Geometry Group Network), ResNet (Residual Neural Network), and MobileNet, which are representative CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) models of artificial intelligence. Experimental results show that ResNet34 showed the highest accuracy for women and men at 91% and 89.9%in Top1-accuracy, while ResNet18 showed the slightest accuracy difference between genders at 1.8%. The difference in accuracy between genders by model causes differences in service quality and unfair results between men and women when using the service.

Construction of a Bark Dataset for Automatic Tree Identification and Developing a Convolutional Neural Network-based Tree Species Identification Model (수목 동정을 위한 수피 분류 데이터셋 구축과 합성곱 신경망 기반 53개 수종의 동정 모델 개발)

  • Kim, Tae Kyung;Baek, Gyu Heon;Kim, Hyun Seok
    • Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science
    • /
    • v.110 no.2
    • /
    • pp.155-164
    • /
    • 2021
  • Many studies have been conducted on developing automatic plant identification algorithms using machine learning to various plant features, such as leaves and flowers. Unlike other plant characteristics, barks show only little change regardless of the season and are maintained for a long period. Nevertheless, barks show a complex shape with a large variation depending on the environment, and there are insufficient materials that can be utilized to train algorithms. Here, in addition to the previously published bark image dataset, BarkNet v.1.0, images of barks were collected, and a dataset consisting of 53 tree species that can be easily observed in Korea was presented. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained and tested on the dataset, and the factors that interfere with the model's performance were identified. For CNN architecture, VGG-16 and 19 were utilized. As a result, VGG-16 achieved 90.41% and VGG-19 achieved 92.62% accuracy. When tested on new tree images that do not exist in the original dataset but belong to the same genus or family, it was confirmed that more than 80% of cases were successfully identified as the same genus or family. Meanwhile, it was found that the model tended to misclassify when there were distracting features in the image, including leaves, mosses, and knots. In these cases, we propose that random cropping and classification by majority votes are valid for improving possible errors in training and inferences.