• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.27-34
• /
• 2011

Purpose: To evaluate the short term clinical result of ACL reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendon using Cross pin and Graft Tensioner and to seek way to resolve the experienced technical problems. Materials and Methods: From January 2008 to March 2009, 35 patients who had been treated arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were enrolled. The femoral side of ACL graft was fixed with Cross pin. The tibial side of graft was fixed with Intrafix and post-tie. The graft was tensioned with Graft Tensioner at 80N. We analyzed the clinical, radiographic results and complications. Results: IKDC subjective score and Lysholm score improved to 89.1 and 91.4 points. Also, Pivot shift test and One-leg hop test showed good results postoperatively. Side to side difference using KT-1000 arthrometer and Telos stress radiography improved compared with normal limb to $2.8{\pm}1.6$ mm and $2.6{\pm}1.3$ mm, respectively. The femoral tunnel enlarged to $2.3{\pm}1.1$ mm. Soft tissue irritation and femoral tunnel-graft harness length mismatch, femoral tunnel-cross pin tunnel mismatch were happened as peri-operative complications. Conclusion: Using of Cross pin and Graft Tensioner for ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon is one of the good method for obtaining stability in short-term clinical result. But to reduce femoral tunnel-cross pin mismatch, it needs to shorten femoral bone tunnel and to create cross pin tunnel as vertical as possible. And to reduce femoral tunnel-graft harness mismatch, it needs to advance position rod further 3 mm when to create femoral tunnel.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.209-213
• /
• 2006

Purpose: Conventional transtibial approach for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction tended to place the femoral tunnel in too vertical position (11 or 1 o'clock), which could provide the postoperative anteroposterior (AP) stability but not provided the rotational stability. Therefore we present a surgical technique to make the transtibial femoral tunnel at 10 or 2 o'clock position. Surgical approach: To make a transtibial femoral tunnel at the 10 or 2 o'clock position, the direction and position of the tibial drill guide was important. We set the tibial drill guide at $40{\sim}45$ degrees and the intraarticular guide tip was 1 mm anterior and medial to the conventional site. The starting point for the guide pin on the proximal tibia was proximal to the pes anserinus and anterior to the medial collateral ligament. The tibial tunnel was initially drilled 1mm less than the diameter of the graft. Then femoral offset guide could be easily placed at 10 or 2 o'clock position through the tibial tunnel. The tibial tunnel and the femoral tunnel of 30 mm in length were made with the reamer that was same size with the graft. Conclusion: We report a surgical technique to create a transtibial femoral tunnel at 10 or 2 o'clock position in ACL reconstruction to provide the rotational stability as well as the AP stability.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.143-148
• /
• 2009

Purpose: To investigate the causes of failure on ACL reconstructions and evaluate the effectiveness of one stage revision ACL reconstructions. Materials and Methods: From November 2004 to July 2008, thirty three patients who had got revision ACL recontstructions after reruptures of ACL were evaluated. The causes of failure of ACL reruptures were 22 vertical femoral tunnels, 7 neglected PLRI, 3 severe traumas and 1 deep infection after ACL reconstruction. The femoral tunnels were aimed at the 10 or 2 o'clock position and the tibial tunnels were used with previous tunnels. Previous femoral screws from the improper femoral tunnels were removed and filled with the new allograft bones. Results: The average periods of follow up were 22.2 months (12~52 months). There was improvement on an average Lysholm knee score from $61.5{\pm}16.8$ to $86.3{\pm}11.5$, IKDC score from $63.9{\pm}15.1$ to $81.3{\pm}14.3$. Mean side to side difference was decreased from $6.0{\pm}2.2\;mm$ to $1.6{\pm}1.4\;mm$ using KT-2000 arthrometer. Conclusion: One stage revision ACL reconstruction can be a useful method with good clinical results.