• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.150-177
• /
• 2018

We review two specific risk management strategies of venture capitalists (VCs): deal syndication and domain specialization with respect to their explicit role in adjudging and managing the overall magnitude of information asymmetry risks. These are analyzed for three distinct categories of VC firms as classified by their funding stage focus (early vs. late), ownership type (foreign vs. domestic) and the human capital composition of the core VC team (entrepreneurial vs. investor). The analysis is based on both secondary data and primary data for active 72 VC firms in India. Syndication is moderately important for entrepreneurial VC firms, but not at all important for early-stage focused and foreign VC firms. This finding is distinctly different from what has been conventionally observed in the literature. Among the various arenas of domain specialization, high-technology focus is important for all segments of VC firms. In the context of investment-stage focus, foreign VC firms exhibit growth-stage specialization, while entrepreneurial VC firms concentrate on earlier investment stages.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• v.7 no.3
• /
• pp.534-563
• /
• 2018

Venture Capital Firms (VCs) encounter severe information asymmetry risks at almost every stage in their investment lifecycle. This paper explores the agency risks arising from information asymmetry during the stage of exits by VCs from the funded companies in their portfolio and how that impacts the incidence of specific types of type of exits (IPOs/M&As). In this empirical study, by using the data on IPO and M&A exits from venture capital-funded companies, we show how the ability of prospective buyers to better resolve agency risks is directly correlated with the incidence of the above exit types. Using the technique of logistic regression, we demonstrate that factors such as syndication, specialization focus of the VC firm (in terms of stage and sector) and the level of its social capital (proxied by its age and experience) drive the success rate of exits. This is one of first studies in context of exits from VC funded companies in the Indian context.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2022

This paper examines the influence of the portion of lead investors and investors' status on the investment performance of venture syndication. According to existing literature, multiple investors in VC syndicates can positively impact investment performance by investing both tangible and intangible resources in target companies based on market influence or high visibility. On the other hand, the presence of multiple leaders can cause conflicts in formulating and implementing investment strategy or free-riding problems or increase entry barriers for potential investors, lowering additional investment from existing investors. Therefore, we hypothesize that the relationship between proportion of lead investors and investment performance is inverted-U shape. Moreover, we predict that the status of VCs in the syndication will moderate the relationship between proportion of lead investors and investment performance since high-status actors are less likely to cooperate with or yield power to others. We tested these hypotheses using 24,677 VC syndicated investment data from 1991 to 2005 and found solid supports for the hypotheses. The findings suggest that firms need to consider relationship-based power dynamics among investors within a syndication and design effective role setting and coordination systems.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.179-199
• /
• 2006

The objective of the study which it analyzes the result which goes made to the equity investor venture company IPOs stock of Korean venture capitalists. The sample company is the venture business 101 which IPO time venture capitalists invest in period KOSDAQ market from 1997 July 1st to 2006 June 30th for 9 years. The result of the study was as follows. First, it is found that syndication investing venture capitalists than the sale investing venture capitalists has desirable investment act which relax non-symmetry information between the publicly held company and the investor. The study support to Bygrave(1987), Lerner(1994) and so on. Second, The venture capitalists under postscript investing the venture business compared to under investing shows IPO excess benefit rate initially more highly from the venture business and the investor whom already invests early stage prove to use the manned it exaggerates the value of the venture business which venture capitalists oneself invests from postscript phase through the high position characteristic At last, it is discovered that the investment equity ratio of venture capitalists effect of sound (-) postscript investor IPO result which analyzed. It is showed that venture capitalists will remain more lowly excess benefit rate as the equity ratio which the venture capitalists invests at the venture business will be high.

• The Journal of Small Business Innovation
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.43-59
• /
• 2018

This study investigates the relationship between venture capital (hereafter, VC) syndicate diversity and the IPO performance of an entrepreneurial company backed by the syndicate. Specifically, focusing on three types of diversity within a VC syndicate, which are aligned with Harrison and Klein's seminal categorization in 2007 (i.e., separation, variety, and disparity), this study suggests their distinct effects on performance. Two stage least square analyses with 1,127 VC syndicate investments made by 6,268 VC firms strongly supported the hypotheses. The results showed that that capacity diversity decreases the performance and that expertise diversity and network diversity increase it.