• 제목/요약/키워드: VTN

검색결과 11건 처리시간 0.016초

Estimating genetic diversity and population structure of 22 chicken breeds in Asia using microsatellite markers

  • Roh, Hee-Jong;Kim, Seung-Chang;Cho, Chang-Yeon;Lee, Jinwook;Jeon, Dayeon;Kim, Dong-kyo;Kim, Kwan-Woo;Afrin, Fahmida;Ko, Yeoung-Gyu;Lee, Jun-Heon;Batsaikhan, Solongo;Susanti, Triana;Hegay, Sergey;Kongvongxay, Siton;Gorkhali, Neena Amatya;Thi, Lan Anh Nguyen;Thao, Trinh Thi Thu;Manikku, Lakmalie
    • Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
    • /
    • 제33권12호
    • /
    • pp.1896-1904
    • /
    • 2020
  • Objective: Estimating the genetic diversity and structures, both within and among chicken breeds, is critical for the identification and conservation of valuable genetic resources. In chickens, microsatellite (MS) marker polymorphisms have previously been widely used to evaluate these distinctions. Our objective was to analyze the genetic diversity and relationships among 22 chicken breeds in Asia based on allelic frequencies. Methods: We used 469 genomic DNA samples from 22 chicken breeds from eight Asian countries (South Korea, KNG, KNB, KNR, KNW, KNY, KNO; Laos, LYO, LCH, LBB, LOU; Indonesia, INK, INS, ING; Vietnam, VTN, VNH; Mongolia, MGN; Kyrgyzstan, KGPS; Nepal, NPS; Sri Lanka, SBC) and three imported breeds (RIR, Rhode Island Red; WLG, White Leghorn; CON, Cornish). Their genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships were analyzed using 20 MS markers. Results: In total, 193 alleles were observed across all 20 MS markers, and the number of alleles ranged from 3 (MCW0103) to 20 (LEI0192) with a mean of 9.7 overall. The NPS breed had the highest expected heterozygosity (Hexp, 0.718±0.027) and polymorphism information content (PIC, 0.663±0.030). Additionally, the observed heterozygosity (Hobs) was highest in LCH (0.690±0.039), whereas WLG showed the lowest Hexp (0.372±0.055), Hobs (0.384±0.019), and PIC (0.325±0.049). Nei's DA genetic distance was the closest between VTN and VNH (0.086), and farthest between KNG and MGN (0.503). Principal coordinate analysis showed similar results to the phylogenetic analysis, and three axes explained 56.2% of the variance (axis 1, 19.17%; 2, 18.92%; 3, 18.11%). STRUCTURE analysis revealed that the 22 chicken breeds should be divided into 20 clusters, based on the highest ΔK value (46.92). Conclusion: This study provides a basis for future genetic variation studies and the development of conservation strategies for 22 chicken breeds in Asia.