• Title/Summary/Keyword: V형 강재댐퍼

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Evaluation on Hysteretic Behaviors of V Shaped Metallic Dampers (V형 강재댐퍼의 이력특성 평가)

  • Lee, Hyun Ho;Kim, Seh Il
    • Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection
    • /
    • v.15 no.1
    • /
    • pp.254-262
    • /
    • 2011
  • The purpose of this study is the development of V shaped metallic damper, which is superior than slit damper in energy dissipation capacity. For this purpose, 9 metallic damper specimens were prepared and shear testing were performed. According to test results, the V shaped metallic damper with strut height of 270mm and strut angle of $60^{\circ}$ shows a better seismic performance than any other specimens. The result of comparison with the yield strength of the dampers using the existing strength formula shows that V type metal dampers were highly evaluated than others within analyzing existing experimental result.

Metallic Damper Shape and Cyclic Behavior for the Seismic Capacity Improvement of Building Structures (건축구조물의 내진성능 향상을 위한 강재댐퍼 형상 및 이력 거동)

  • Lee, Hyun-Ho;Kim, Seh-Il
    • Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection
    • /
    • v.14 no.3
    • /
    • pp.123-130
    • /
    • 2010
  • The aim of this paper is a seismic performance evaluation of metallic damper devices which are efficient in workability and installation process. For this V shape and S shape dampers is considered. The strut figures of dampers are V shape and S shape and, the research parameters are strut height and angle of the dampers. ABAQUS program is used for nonlinear finite element analysis. The analysis is performed with the hysteretic curve that has maximum displacement with 50mm and has increased progressive. As a results of evaluating the yield strength, maximum strength and energy dissipation capacity of each device, V and S shape have a good strength capacity and the devices with strut angle $60^{\circ}$ and strut height 140 and 200mm are evaluated stable in seismic behaviors. The response of S shape is more efficient than that of V shape. In the yield strength estimation process, proposed formula can not estimate the yield strength of V and S shape dampers. Even though, the formula can not consider the variation of strut heights and strut angles. Finally the S shape damper is recommended in seismic performance than V shape damper.