• Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.293-300
• /
• 2009

목 적: 본 연구는 배아이식일의 자궁동맥혈류가 인간 체외수정술에서 임신예후의 예측인자가 될 수 있는지 알아보기 위해 시행되었다. 연구방법: 51회의 체외수정술 주기에 대해 전향적인 임상 관찰로 시행되었으며 혈청 estradiol 농도는 hCG 투여일에 측정되었고, 자궁동맥 박동율 (PI)과 저항율 (RI)은 배아이식 3일째에 측정되었다. 결 과: 51회의 주기 중 22주기에서 임상적으로 임신이 확인되었고 (43.1%), 착상률은 14.7%였다. 자궁동맥 PI와 RI는 혈청 estradiol 농도과 의미 있는 음의 상관관계 (p<0.05)를 보였으며 자궁혈류량은 임신된 그룹과 임신 되지 않은 그룹에서 차이가 없었다. 임신율은 PI가 3.0 이상인 군에서 PI가 3.0 이하인 군보다 조금 높게 측정되었으나 통계학적인 유의성은 없었다. 결 론: 배아이식일의 자궁동맥 PI와 RI는 체외수정술에서 임신의 예측인자로는 효용성이 떨어지지만 estradiol 농도와는 음의 상관관계를 보여 자궁혈류와 estradiol 농도가 상관관계가 있음을 알 수 있다.

• Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.30-35
• /
• 2019

Objective: Bilateral uterine artery ligation (UAL) is a fertility-preserving procedure used in women experiencing postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). However, the long-term effects of this procedure on ovarian function remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether bilateral UAL compromised ovarian reserve and ovarian blood supply. Methods: This prospective study included 49 women aged between 21 and 36 years who had undergone a cesarean section for obstetric indications. Of these, 25 underwent uterine bilateral UAL to control intractable atonic PPH. The control group consisted of 24 women who had not undergone bilateral UAL. Standard clinical parameters, the results of color Doppler screening, and ovarian reserve markers were assessed in all participants at 6 months after surgery. The clinical parameters included age, parity, cycle history, body mass index, and previous medication and/or surgery. Color Doppler screening findings included the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) for both the uterine and ovarian arteries. The ovarian reserve markers included day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, antral follicle count, and $anti-M\ddot{u}llerian$ hormone (AMH) levels. Results: There were no significant differences in the ovarian reserve markers of day 3 FSH levels, antral follicle count, and AMH levels between the study and control groups (p> 0.05 for all). In addition, no significant differences were observed in the PI and RI indices of the uterine and ovarian arteries (p> 0.05 for all). Conclusion: In this study, we showed that bilateral UAL had no negative effects on ovarian reserve or ovarian blood supply, so this treatment should be used as a fertility preservation technique to avoid hysterectomy in patients experiencing PPH.