• Title/Summary/Keyword: Uterine pulsatility index

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Prediction of Pregnancy Outcomes by Uterine Artery Impedances on the Day of Embryo Transfer in Human IVF (인간 체외수정술에서 배아 이식일의 자궁동맥 임피던스에 따른 임신의 예측)

  • Jeong, Ju-Eun;Jo, Moo-Sung;Kim, Seung-Chul;Joo, Jong-Kil;Choi, Jong-Ryeol;Lee, Kyu-Sup
    • Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
    • /
    • v.36 no.4
    • /
    • pp.293-300
    • /
    • 2009
  • Objective: This study was aimed to investigate whether uterine blood flow on the day of embryo transfer can be a predictor of pregnancy outcome in human IVF. Methods: Fifty-one patients undergoing IVF program were included in this study. Serum estradiol levels were measured on the day of hCG administration and uterine pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) was examined for at embryo transfer of day 3. Results: Of 51 cycles, 22 cycles were clinically pregnant (43.1%) and the implantation rate was 14.7%. Uterine PI and RI had a significant inverse correlation with serum estradiol levels (p<0.05). These uterine blood flows were not significantly different between pregnant and nonpregnant groups. The pregnancy rate was slightly higher in patients with PI more than 3.0 compared to those with PI of 3.0 or less, but there was no significant difference. Conclusion: These results suggest that uterine PI and RI at the day of embryo transfer could not be a good predictor of pregnancy in IVF treatment. But they had an inverse correlation with serum estradiol levels on the day of hCG administration.

Does bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage?

  • Verit, Fatma Ferda;Cetin, Orkun;Keskin, Seda;Akyol, Hurkan;Zebitay, Ali Galip
    • Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
    • /
    • v.46 no.1
    • /
    • pp.30-35
    • /
    • 2019
  • Objective: Bilateral uterine artery ligation (UAL) is a fertility-preserving procedure used in women experiencing postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). However, the long-term effects of this procedure on ovarian function remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether bilateral UAL compromised ovarian reserve and ovarian blood supply. Methods: This prospective study included 49 women aged between 21 and 36 years who had undergone a cesarean section for obstetric indications. Of these, 25 underwent uterine bilateral UAL to control intractable atonic PPH. The control group consisted of 24 women who had not undergone bilateral UAL. Standard clinical parameters, the results of color Doppler screening, and ovarian reserve markers were assessed in all participants at 6 months after surgery. The clinical parameters included age, parity, cycle history, body mass index, and previous medication and/or surgery. Color Doppler screening findings included the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) for both the uterine and ovarian arteries. The ovarian reserve markers included day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, antral follicle count, and $anti-M\ddot{u}llerian$ hormone (AMH) levels. Results: There were no significant differences in the ovarian reserve markers of day 3 FSH levels, antral follicle count, and AMH levels between the study and control groups (p> 0.05 for all). In addition, no significant differences were observed in the PI and RI indices of the uterine and ovarian arteries (p> 0.05 for all). Conclusion: In this study, we showed that bilateral UAL had no negative effects on ovarian reserve or ovarian blood supply, so this treatment should be used as a fertility preservation technique to avoid hysterectomy in patients experiencing PPH.