• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제52권4호
• /
• pp.226-245
• /
• 2019

보물 제1259호로 지정된 법주사 <괘불탱>은 1766년에 조성되었으며, 화면 중앙에 여래를 단독으로 배치한 독존형식의 괘불화이다. 법주사본은 현존하는 괘불화 중에서 세로 폭이 가장 긴 작품이자 18세기의 대표적인 화사인 두훈이 조성하였다. 두훈이 제작한 괘불화는 법주사본과 더불어 통도사 <석가여래괘불탱>(1767)이 현존한다. 두 작품은 도상이 같기 때문에 동일한 초본을 사용하였을 것으로 추정되는데, 1년이라는 시간 차이가 있음에도 대부분의 화사가 교체되었기 때문에 수화사인 두훈의 역량을 확인할 수 있다. 이 중 법주사본은 통도사본보다 먼저 제작되었을 뿐만 아니라 화기를 통하여 왕실과 연관성이 엿보이므로 중요한 의미를 가진다. 법주사에는 영빈이씨의 위패를 모시던 선희궁 원당이 존재한다. 이 원당은 1765년에 건립되어 법주사본이 왕실과 관련이 있을 것으로 추정할 수 있는 근거가 된다. 특히 법주사본 화기에 등장하는 비혼의 여성 집단에 주목할 수 있다. 이들 중 경진생 이씨를 비롯한 일부 인물들이 영빈과 화완옹주가 시주에 참여한 봉인사 불사에도 이름을 올리고 있어 영빈과 관련된 궁녀들임을 추정할 수 있다. 이와 더불어 법주사본 하단에 '주상주삼전하수만세(主上主三殿下壽萬歲)'라고 강조된 축원문을 통하여 법주사본과 왕실의 관련성을 확인할 수 있다. 또한 미술사적 특징뿐만 아니라 과학 분석도 함께 접근하였는데, 먼저 법주사 <괘불탱>의 손상 유형을 보면 꺾임과 접힘, 주름이 관찰되며 습해로 인한 화면 얼룩, 안료 박락, 안료 점상형 박락, 뒷면 배접지에 안료 이염 등이 관찰된다. 채색 안료 분석 결과를 보면 백색 안료는 연백을 사용하였으며 흑색 안료는 먹과 니람을 사용했다. 적색 안료는 진사와 연단을 단독으로 사용하거나 혼합하여 사용하였으며 자주색은 유기염료를 사용한 것으로 추정된다. 황색은 육색에서는 연백과 등황을 혼합하여 사용하거나 연백 위에 등황으로 중첩 채색하였고 보관은 금박을 사용하였다. 녹색 안료는 염화동(녹염동광)을 단독으로 사용하거나 염화동(녹염동광)과 공작석을 혼합 사용하였다. 청색 안료는 석청과 회청을 단독으로 사용하거나 혼합 사용하였다.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.105-117
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of aroma therapy on anxiety and pain before and after tooth extraction. The subjects in this study were 60 patients who felt severe anxiety and pain due to tooth extraction. The experiment was conducted from January through March, 2004, by organizing an experimental group and a control group with 30 patients each. The experimental group was asked to keep wearing lavender-containing necklaces from two days before tooth extraction to inhale lavender, and no such an action was taken to the control group. The collected data were analyzed with SPSS 10.0 program to obtain statistical data. and ${\times}2$ test and t-test were implemented. The findings of this study were as follows: 1. Regarding whether or not the experimental and control groups were homogeneous, men outnumbered women, and the largest number of the patients were in their 30s. Those who were married were more than the others who were unmarried in number, and those who lived with their spouses under the same roof together outnumbered the others who didn't, as the rate of the former stood at 65 percent in the experimental group and 86.4 percent in the control group. They expressed high satisfaction at their spouses, since 45 percent of the experimental group and 31 percent of the control group did it, but the difference between them and those who were unsatisfied was insignificant (pE0.347). By occupation, the largest number of people in the experimental group, which numbered 16.7 percent, were self-employed, and lots of patients in the control group were government workers. As for blood type, type A was most prevailing, which recorded 43.3 percent. By religion, 43 percent of the experimental group had no religion, whereas 36.7 percent of the control group were Christian. The most common monthly income ranged from 2 million to 2.5 million won. 2. There was little disparity in past pain experience between the two groups before aroma therapy was applied. The experimental group underwent more pain (6.15) than the control group (5.78), but the difference wasn't significant. The experimental group (90%) experienced more anxiety and fear than the control group(83%), but the difference was insignificant. This fact showed that there was little gap between the two groups in anxiety and fear caused by tooth extraction. Contrary to earlier expectation that pre-anxiety might not be the same. little significant difference was found. 3. After aroma therapy was applied, 50 percent of the experimental group and 23.3 percent of the control group suffered significantly less anxiety and fear about tooth extraction(${\times}2$=4.59, pE.05). And the experimental group exposed to aroma therapy was less nervous(3.0) than the control group(4.39), and the gap between the two was significant (t=13.37, pE.001). Therefore, aroma therapy had a good effect on alleviating their anxiety. During tooth extraction. 73.3 percent of the experimental group and 93.3 percent of the control group felt pain. The former group suffered Significantly less pain(${\times}2$=4.32, PE.05). Concerning the extent of pain, the experimental group(2.53) found it less painful to have their teeth extracted than the control group(5.50), and the gap between the two was significant(t=5.89, PE.05). 4. As to the effect of aroma therapy on alleviating anxiety or fear, the experimental group(33.3%) felt that aroma therapy let them more relieved. Every member of that group was willing to use aroma therapy again in the future, and 86.7 percent of that group perceived that aroma therapy made a difference to dental treatment. The experimental group responded to aroma therapy favorably, as every member of it had an intention to advise others to use that therapy.