• 제목/요약/키워드: Uniformity of Drawn Cups

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.049초

비원형단면에 대한 판재 성형성(II) - 임의단면에 대하여 - (Formability of Sheet Metal in Noncircular Cup Drawing (ll) - for Arbitrary Cross Sections -)

  • 김민수;신재현;서대교
    • 대한기계학회논문집
    • /
    • 제17권12호
    • /
    • pp.3094-3104
    • /
    • 1993
  • The five punch and die sets are selected as the examples of arbitrary cross sections which have two opposite inclined sides. Two kinds of blank shapes are designed for all cross sections. One(h-b1.) is determined by slip-line theory and the other (G-b1.) is determined conventionally as the similar shapes with the cross sections which were used by Gopinathan. As a result of the experimental procedures, the superiority of the blank shapes designed by slip-line theory is verified in the limiting drawing ratio, the uniformity of cup height and the thickness distributions.

비원형 단면에 대한 판재 성형성(I) (직사각형 단면에 대하여) (Formability of Sheet Metal in Noncircular Cup Drawing(I) (for Rectangular Cross Section))

  • 신재현;김민수;서대교
    • 한국자동차공학회논문집
    • /
    • 제2권1호
    • /
    • pp.84-95
    • /
    • 1994
  • The effects of punch and blank shapes in the rectangular cup drawing process are examined experimentally to improve the formabilities. For this purpose, three blank shapes which are h-bl., G-bl., and T-bl., and five punch shape factors which are the ratios of two adjacent side lengths in rectangular cross section are adopted. The constructing methods of the three blank shapes are as follows. The h-bl. is designed by slip-line theory, and the G-bl. is selected for the similar shape to the punch. The T-bl. is obtained by the drawing method which is introduced in the technical references. The five punch shape factors are selected for length/width=1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75 and 2. The experimental procedures are performed for all the above forming conditions to investigate and compare the formabilities. As a result, it is verified experimentally that the rectangular cups drawn by the h-bl. are more ideal than those drawn by G-bl. and T-bl.. They have not only higher limiting drawing ratio, more uniformity in drawn cup heights and more ideal thickness distributions, but also need relatively less maximum drawing forces.

  • PDF