• 대한심미치과학회지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.33-38
• /
• 2005

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.77-84
• /
• 2017

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to compare the surface roughness of zirconia when using Zircos E etching system (ZSAT), applying a nitric acid-hydrofluoric acid compound as a pretreatment agent, and also to compare the shear bonding strength according to different resin cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS. ZSAT, air abrasion, and tribochemical silicacoating were applied on prepared 120 zirconia specimens (10 mm in diameter, 7 mm in height) using CAD/CAM. Each 12 specimens with 4 different resin cements (Panavia F 2.0, Rely X Unicem, Superbond C&B, and Hot bond) were applied to test interfacial bond strength. The statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The results are as follows: after application of the ZSAT on the zirconia specimens, surface roughness value after 2-hour etching was higher than those after 1- and 3-hour etching on SEM images. RESULTS. For Superbond C&B and Rely X Unicem, the specimens treated with ZSAT showed higher shear bond strength values than those treated with air abrasion and tribochemical silicacoating system. Regarding the failure mode of interface over cement and zirconia surface, Rely X Unicem and Hot bond showed cohesive failures and Panavia F 2.0 and Superbond C&B showed mixed failures. CONCLUSION. Zircos E etching system in zirconia restoration could increase its shear bond strength. However, its long term success rate and clinical application should be further evaluated.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제48권9호
• /
• pp.680-687
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study was to compare post cementation efficacy according to the different adhesive systems and cement delivery methods. A total of 40 extracted human single-rooted premolar teeth were randomly divided in four groups according to the two luting agents of Unicem applicap (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) or Variolink II (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) and cement delivery methods of direct cement application or lentulo spiral application. After restoration using glass?fiber posts, the samples were embedded in acrylic resin. Three sections of 2 mm thickness were prepared from each specimen, and the post in each section was subjected to a push-out test. The data were analysed statistically at significant level of 95%. The Unicem had significantly higher push-out bond strength than Variolink and the lentulo spiral application made higher bond strength (p<0.05). Adhesive failure between cement and dentin was predominant in all groups. The Unicem of self-etch system and cement delivery using lentulo spiral showed clinically acceptable and comparable bonding strength for the fiber post.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.343-355
• /
• 2007

4종의 레진시멘트를 통한 상아질과 간접 레진 수복물 간의 인장결합강도를 열순환 시효처리 여부에 따라 측정하여 비교하고, 주사전자현미경 관찰을 통하여 각 레진시멘트의 접착 내구성을 평가하고자 시행하였다. 48개의 건전한 제3대구치의 상아질 표면을 평탄하게 노출시키고 #320 grit Sic Paper로 연마하였다. 복합레진 블록을 제작하여 #600 grit Sic Paper로 연마한 후에 접착면을 Sandblast로 처리하였다. 각각의 레진시멘트로 제조사 지침에 따라 적용하여 복합레진 블록을 상아질 표면에 접착하였다. 이후 제작된 시편을 열순환시키지 않거나, 1,000회, 5,000회 열순환 시킨 후 ($5^{\circ}C\;-\;55^{\circ}C$) 미세인장결합강도를 측정하였다. 열순환 전 시편의 접착계면 (수직절단면)과 파절된 시편의 상아질 파단면을 전자현미경 관찰하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. Variolink II의 결합강도는 다른 실험군보다 높은 결합강도를 보여주었으며, 1,000회 열순환 후 유의성 있게 결합강도가 감소되었다 (p < 0.05). 3. Multilink의 결합강도는 열순환에 가장 많은 영향을 받았으며 1,000회 열순환 이후 유의성 있게 감소되었다 (p < 0.05). 3. Panavia F 2.0과 Rely X Unicem의 결합강도는 열순환에 의하여 감소되지 않았다 (p > 0.05). 4. 접착형 레진시멘트는 복합레진형 레진시멘트에 비해서 열처리 전후 모두 낮은 결합강도를 보여주었다. 5. 결합강도가 높은 Vaviolink II와 Multilink에서는 혼합형 파괴양상을 보였고, 결합강도가 낮은 Panavia F 2.0에서는 접착성 파괴 양상을 나타내었다. 이상의 연구 결과를 토대로 적절한 전처리와 접착제를 도포한다면 복합레진형 레진시멘트는 접착형 레진시멘트보다 결합강도와 그 내구성이 우수하다고 할 수 있을 것이다. 접착성 간접 수복물의 초기 결합강도와 내구성은 레진시멘트의 접착과정과 종류, 형태에 의해 영향을 받기 때문에 이들의 적절한 선택과 올바른 사용이 성공적인 수복을 위해 중요하다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2015

PURPOSE. This study was performed to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) between three dual-cured resin cements and silica coated zirconia, before and after thermocycling treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixty specimens were cut in $15{\times}2.75mm$ discs using zirconia. After air blasting of $50{\mu}m$ alumina, samples were prepared by tribochemical silica coating with $Rocatec^{TM}$ plus. The specimens were divided into three groups according to the dual-cure resin cement used: (1) Calibra silane+$Calibra^{(R)}$, (2) Monobond S+$Multilink^{(R)}$ N and (3) ESPN sil+$RelyX^{TM}$ Unicem Clicker. After the resin cement was bonded to the zirconia using a Teflon mold, photopolymerization was carried out. Only 10 specimens in each group were thermocycled 6,000 times. Depending on thermocycling treatment, each group was divided into two subgroups (n=10) and SBS was measured by applying force at the speed of 1 mm/min using a universal testing machine. To find out the differences in SBS according to the types of cements and thermocycling using the SPSS, two-way ANOVA was conducted and post-hoc analysis was performed by Turkey's test. RESULTS. In non-thermal aged groups, SBS of Multilink group (M1) was higher than that of Calibra (C1) and Unicem (U1) group (P<.05). Moreover, even after thermocycling treatment, SBS of Multilink group (M2) was higher than the other groups (C2 and U2). All three cements showed lower SBS after the thermocycling than before the treatments. But Multilink and Unicem had a significant difference (P<.05). CONCLUSION. In this experiment, Multilink showed the highest SBS before and after thermocycling. Also, bond strengths of all three cements decreased after thermocycling.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.113-119
• /
• 2009

본 연구의 목적은 다른 표면 젖음성을 갖는 상아질에 대한 수종의 자가접착레진시멘트의 인장접착강도를 비교하고자 하는 것이다. 이번 실험을 위해 Rely-X Unicem (3M, ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), Embrace Wetbond (Pulpdent, Oakland, MA, USA), Maxcem (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA) 3 종의 자기접착레진시멘트를 사용하였다. 발거한 상, 하악 대구치 60개를 미세절단기 (Acutom P-50, Struers, Copenhagen, Benmark)를 이용해 한 치아에서 $2mm{\times}2mm{\times}7mm$의 치아 시편 두개씩 얻었다. 상아질 표면을 건조 그룹은 10초간 강한 공기로 건조시켰고, 습윤 그룹은 과잉의 수분을 2 초간 거즈로 압박해 제거하였다. 상아질 표면의 젖음성을 달리한 시편에 자가접착레진시멘트를 접착한 후 상온의 상대습도 100% 상태에서 24시간 보관했고, 만능시험기 (EZ Test, Shimadzu corporation, Kyoto, Japan)를 이용해 인장접착강도를 측정했고, 분리된 접착면의 파절양상을 근관 치료용 현미경 (OPMI pro, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany)을 이용해 20 배의 배율로 관찰하였다. $SPSS^{TM}$ Ver 10.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)을 사용하여 동일한 자가접착레진시멘트에서 상아질 젖음성에 따른 인장접착강도를 T-test로 비교하였으며, 각 자가접착레진시멘트간의 인장접착강도를 One way ANOVA test로 비교 분석하고 95% 유의수준에서 Scheffe's test로 사후검정 하였다. 실험 결과 자가접착레진시멘트의 인장접착강도는 상아질 젖음성에 영향을 받지 않았으며, 상아질 표면 젖음성과 상관없이 Maxcem의 인장접착강도가 Unicem과 Embrace의 인장접착강도보다 유의성 있는 낮은 값을 나타내었다. 또한 모든 시편의 분리된 접착면은 접착실패 양상을 나타내었다. 이상의 실험 결과로 볼 때 자가접착레진시멘트는 상아질 표면 젖음성에 상관없이 사용할 수 있을 것이라고 생각된다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.125-131
• /
• 2011

연구목적: Silane 처리가 FRC-포스트와 레진 시멘트 간의 결합강도에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: FRC-포스트로 LuxaPost (DMG)와 Rely-X Fiber Post (3M ESPE)를 사용하였으며 자가 접착 레진 시멘트인 Rely-X Unicem (3M ESPE)과 전통형 레진시멘트인 Rely-X ARC (3M ESPE)와의 Rely-X Ceramic Primer (3M ESPE)를 이용한 표면처리 유무에 따른 결합강도를 push-out test를 실시하여 측정하고 independent samples t-test 및 one-way ANOVA와 Scheffe 사후검정을 95% 유의수준에서 실시하였다. 결과: 실험 결과 Rely-X Fiber Post를 사용한 실험군에서 silane 처리와 관계없이 Rely-X ARC를 적용하였을 때, 다른 실험군들에 비해 높은 결합 강도가 나타났으며 LuxaPost를 사용한 실험군에서 각각의 레진 시멘트에 대해 silane 처리를 하였을 때 시행하지 않은 실험군에 비해 높은 결합 강도가 나타났다. 결론: 이상의 실험 결과로 볼 때 미리 silane 처리된 LuxaPost를 사용하더라도 silane 처리를 시행하는 것이 좋은 것으로 생각된다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제33권6호
• /
• pp.553-559
• /
• 2008

이 연구의 목적은 레진 코팅된 표면과 레진인레이 사이의 자가-접착 레진시멘트를 이용한 결합 시 임시가봉제에 따른 미세인장결합강도를 평가하는 것이었다. Caviton(GC, Tokyo, Japan), Provifil(Promedica, Neumunster, Germany), Provifil(Promedica, Neumunster Germany) & petrolatum, and Eugenol-based cement, Tembond(Kerr, Orange. CA, USA) 이 임시가봉재로 사용되었다. Tescera(Bisco, Schamburg IL, USA) 로 제작하였고 자가-접착 레진시멘트인 Rely X unicem (3M, St. Paul. Minn, USA) 를 이용하여 접착하였다. 이후 미세인 장결합강도를 측정하였고 one-way anova 와 Duncan test 를 이용하여 분석하였다.(p<0.05) Caviton 군이 다른 그룹과 비교하여 유의성 있는 차이를 보여주었다(p<0.05). Provifil, Provifil & petrolatum, Tembond 군 등은 상대적으로 낮은 값을 보여주었다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.305-311
• /
• 2013

PURPOSE. Over the past years, the adhesion of fiber posts luted with simplified adhesive systems has been a matter of great interest. The aim of this study was to assess the post retentive potential of a self-adhesive resin cement using different adhesive systems to compare the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The post spaces of 56 mandibular premolar roots were prepared and divided into 4 experimental groups and further divided into 2 subgroups according to testing time (n=7). The fiber posts (Rely X Fiber Post) were luted with a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and one of the following adhesive systems: no adhesive, a total-etch adhesive resin (Single Bond), a two-step self-etch adhesive resin (Clearfil SE Bond) and a one-step self-etch adhesive resin (Clearfil S3 Bond). Each root was cut horizontally, and 1.5 mm thick six root segments were prepared. Push-out tests were performed after one week or three months (0.5 mm/min). Statistical analysis were performed with three-way ANOVA (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. Cervical root segments showed higher bond strength values than middle segments. Adhesive application increased the bond strength. For one week group, the total-etch adhesive resin Single Bond showed higher bond strength than the self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem applied without adhesive resin at middle region. For 3 months group, the two-step self-etch adhesive resin Clearfil SE Bond showed the highest bond strength for both regions. Regarding the time considered, Clearfil SE Bond 3 months group showed higher bond strength values than one week group. CONCLUSION. Using the adhesive resins in combination with the self-adhesive resin cement improves the bond strengths. The bond strength values of two-step self-etch adhesive resin Clearfil SE Bond improved as time passes.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.12-16
• /
• 2014

Objectives: Extensively destroyed teeth are commonly restored with composite resin before cavity preparation for indirect restorations. The longevity of the restoration can be related to the proper bonding of the resin cement to the composite. This study aimed to evaluate the microshear bond strength of two self-adhesive resin cements to composite resin. Material and Methods: Composite discs were subject to one of six different surface pretreatments: none (control), 35% phosphoric acid etching for 30 seconds (PA), application of silane (silane), PA + silane, PA + adhesive, or PA + silane + adhesive (n = 6). A silicone mold containing a cylindrical orifice ($1mm^2$ diameter) was placed over the composite resin. RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE) or BisCem (Bisco Inc.) self-adhesive resin cement was inserted into the orifices and light-cured. Self-adhesive cement cylinders were submitted to shear loading. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results: Independent of the cement used, the PA + Silane + Adhesive group showed higher microshear bond strength than those of the PA and PA + Silane groups. There was no difference among the other treatments. Unicem presented higher bond strength than BisCem for all experimental conditions. Conclusions: Pretreatments of the composite resin surface might have an effect on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to this substrate.