• 한국대기환경학회지
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.561-571
• /
• 2005

To introduce an emissions trading system for GHG that currently have no reduction requirements, the following should be considered as priorities: eliciting the participation of the industrial sector and linking GHG emission trading systems to the emissions trading system (implemented from July 2007) that has become part of national policy with the enactment of the Special Act. Two directions can serve as viable alternatives in that regard. One is a baseline-and-credit method based on incentive auctioning. This has the advantage of inducing participation through economic incentives without a reductions commitment. The downside of this method is that it requires vast investments, as well as the fact that reaching an agreement between participants and the government to decide an objective baseline is difficult. On the other hand, the cap-and-trade method set forth in the Special Act is attractive in that it can be integrated with the air pollutant emissions trading system, but it would be difficult to elicit the participation of the industrial sector in the absence of GHG emission reduction requirements. In the current situation, it would be preferable for the government to induce the participation of the industrial sector by devising a wide variety of incentives because taking part in the emissions trading system before reducing GHG emissions offers large incentives through learning by doing. The timing of GHG reduction commitments and emissions trading system implementation may be uncertain but their Implementation will be unavoidable. Thus the government needs to facilitate preparations for emissions trading of GHG in the future and continuously review its operation in integration with the air pollutant emissions trading system to maximize adaptation and teaming by doing effect in the industrial sector.

• 대한전기학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한전기학회 2004년도 추계학술대회 논문집 전력기술부문
• /
• pp.266-268
• /
• 2004

This paper presents the greenhouse gas emission trading scheme which is under progress as a pilot project at the power sector in preparation for UNFCCC. By referring UK's, Emission Trading is introduced incentive auction to maximize the reduction of greenhouse gas emission. At the 1st step, from year 2006 to 2008, only CO2 is regarded as an objective target to decrease but emission credit is excluded with an assumption and only 5 Generation company take part in as participants. The market operating procedure is composed of participants' registration, baseline verification, incentive auction, the registration of initial and yearly allocation, emission trading, yearly emission verification & approval, yearly obligation conformity, carry forward & incentive grant. It can be serve a guideline the whole aspects of emission trading which will start in 2006 including operation, verification and profit sharing.

• International journal of advanced smart convergence
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.111-118
• /
• 2023

In the ever-changing landscape of finance, the fusion of artificial intelligence (AI)and pair trading strategies has captured the interest of investors and institutions alike. In the context of supervised machine learning, crafting precise and accurate labels is crucial, as it remains a top priority to empower AI models to surpass traditional pair trading methods. However, prevailing labeling techniques in the financial sector predominantly concentrate on individual assets, posing a challenge in aligning with pair trading strategies. To address this issue, we propose an inventive approach that melds the Triple Barrier Labeling technique with pair trading, optimizing the resultant labels through genetic algorithms. Rigorous backtesting on cryptocurrency datasets illustrates that our proposed labeling method excels over traditional pair trading methods and corresponding buy-and-hold strategies in both profitability and risk control. This pioneering method offers a novel perspective on trading strategies and risk management within the financial domain, laying a robust groundwork for further enhancing the precision and reliability of pair trading strategies utilizing AI models.

• 전기학회논문지
• /
• 제64권5호
• /
• pp.667-679
• /
• 2015

The bearer of the power sector's ETS compliance cost is power consumer for the following reasons. Firstly, power companies are constrained in establishing appropriate strategies to comply with ETS regulations due to the structural differences between the domestic power market and emission trading system. In other words, because power companies do not have a right to determine price and production of electricity, they have to compete with other companies under disadvantaged conditions in the emission trading market. Secondly, because ETS compliance cost is part of power production costs as it is also clearly written in the national greenhouse gas reduction road-map and the second energy supply plan, the cost should be included in power price following the power market operation rule. Thirdly, the most effective method to reduce carbon emissions in power sector is to reduce power demand, which is efficiently achieved through raising power price to a realistic level. Low power price in Korea is the major cause of rising power demand which is also the major cause of rising GHG emission. Therefore, power sector's ETS compliance cost should be included in power price to encourage power consumers' actions on reducing power consumption. Fourthly, when externality cost occurs in the process of delivering public services, usually beneficiary pay principle is applied to identify the cost bearer. Since electricity is one representative public good, the bearer of power sector's ETS compliance cost is power consumer.

• 한국유통학회지:유통연구
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.153-172
• /
• 1997

The distribution sector is affected by a wide range of regulations. Many of these are related to health and safety, others are related to urban planning and environmental issues, whereas some mainly have an economic basis. But, regulations many be unduly restrictive, in which case they can drive up costs and ultimately prices, or they may, in some cases, reduce consumer choice. Unduly restrictive regulations could also increase costs indirectly, by reducing competition and thus lead to lower productivity growth. In the past few years, distribution sector has gone through drastic changes due to deregulation and market opening. Implementation of regulatory reforms served as an opportunity to change laws and systems which had been an obstacle to development of distribution sector. Market opening of distribution sector became a turning point to promote competition among domestic and foreign firms. However, for small and medium scale of the typical retail enterprises which were in no position to compete in terms of prices, additional facilities, and services, faced a threat of diminished trading area, and even of their existence. Because, large firms may have greater market power than small firms, as they can more easily extract favorable terms when procuring goods, and may also be able to deter entry by advertising outlays or access to the best sites. In addition, larger chain stores armied with sufficient capital dominated trading area and reduced customer's welfare by abusing their monopoly power when competing with other shops, and are often cited as an example of adverse effects of local monopoly. In order to minimize such adverse effects and to foster competition, regulatory reforms in distribution sector should set its goal to promote sound and stable distribution activities through market principle and restoring competition principle, and ultimately to boost customers welfare. Therefore, deregulation in distribution sector should be implemented in a way to promote customers welfare, eliminate entry barriers, and expand competition principle such as productivity and efficiency competition. However, it should be also recognized that deregulation of system alone is not enough to develop the distribution sector. To compete in a increasingly concentrated industry, small enterprises increasingly engage in co-operative arrangements, such as buying groups, strategic alliances or franchise agreements.

• Journal of Forest and Environmental Science
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.157-165
• /
• 2009

Forests potentially contribute to global climate change through their influence on the global carbon (C) cycle. The Kyoto Protocol provides for the involvement of developing countries in an atmospheric greenhouse gas reduction regime under its Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Carbon credits are gained from reforestation and afforestation activities in developing countries. Bangladesh, a densely populated tropical country in South Asia, has a huge degraded forestland, which can be reforested by CDM projects. To realize the potential of the forestry sector in developing countries like Bangladesh for full-scale emission mitigation, the carbon sequestration potential should be integrated with the carbon trading system under the CDM of the Kyoto Protocol. This paper discusses the prospects of carbon trading in Bangladesh, in relation to the CDM, in the context of global warming.

• 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.201-245
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 일반균형모형을 이용하여 배출권 거래로 인한 일반균형효과와 온실가스 저감비용의 효율성에 대해 알아보았다. 모든 국가가 교토의정서를 비준하고 연합을 형성한 국가끼리 배출권 거래를 한다는 가정 하에서 분할함수형태의 온실가스저감게임을 구성하였고, 전지구를 미국과 미국 이외의 OECD 국가군, 구소련연방, 개도국으로 나누어 연합구조별로 각 국가군에 미치는 영향을 일반균형모형으로 분석한 결과 대연합 하에서 기후변화협약은 연합을 형성하지 않은 ${\phi}$연합구조에 비해 동일한 환경적 효과를 달성하는데 978억 달러를 줄일 수 있어서 효율적인 것으로 나타났다. 하지만, 이 중 약 절반을 미국이 가지고 OEC가 20%를 가지는 반면 배출권 판매국인 구소련연방과 개도국은 각각 18%와 10%만을 가지는 것으로 나타나 배출권 구매국이 전체 연합이익의 약 70%를 가지는 것을 확인하였다. 개도국이 연합에 참여하지 않으면 2010년 Annex-I 국가의 저감량의 최대 22%를 상쇄하는 유출량을 발생하므로 기후변화협약의 본래의 목적인 온실가스 저감 및 안정화를 위해서는 개도국이 연합에 참여하여 유출량을 줄여야 한다. 하지만, 전지구적 배출권 거래시 Annex I 국가가 상당량의 연합이익을 가져가고 개도국의 에너지 산업은 위축되므로 기후변화협약의 안정성을 위해 추가지원금을 제안하고 개도국을 연합에 참여하도록 유인할 필요가 있다.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2013

By the continued island-mainland bridging works, increased consumer demand for seashore regions and fundamental improvement of accessibility to metropolitan areas, rural service industries in the island areas has been rapidly developed in the past decades, and also, their functions differentiated geographically. In most island areas, catering and accommodation sectors have been expanded, while traditional trading sector decreasing. And the dominant power of public sectors has been increased but private ones decreased. So, the overall development trends of service industries in island areas would be considered as unhealthy for rural economic sustainability. As a tentative solution, it may be proposed that through the functional specialization/differentiation and efficient linking/networking of rural service industries with multifunctionality of countryside capitals, their spatial cohesion would be strengthened.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.143-163
• /
• 2006

The terms electronic trade, electronic trading and electronic commerce are often used interchangeably, and refer to trading transactions conducted using electronic media. Electronic trade is business-to-business transactions in an industrial context, while electronic commerce refers to retailing and the consumer sector as well as mass marketing. The Electronic trade process is defined as a flow of information (documents) exchanged between enterprises and trade-related firms (shipping companies, foreign exchange banks, forwarders, etc.) in the course of implementing a series of export and import procedures. Electronic trading systems exploit information technology to improve the efficiency of communications and/or to alter the nature of inter-organizational transactions. Many studies exist about the adoption of inter-organizational systems (IOS) and electronic data interchange (EDI), but few focus on electronic trade. The literature on exporting companies's electronic trade adoption and implementation, although extensive, consists mainly of exploratory studies focusing on technological characteristics such as barriers, benefits and usage. The purpose of this study is to broaden this perspective by investigating the environmental, organizational and technological drivers of business-to-business e-commerce adoption.

• 조명전기설비학회논문지
• /
• 제23권5호
• /
• pp.50-57
• /
• 2009

교토 프로토콜이 2008년 발효됨에 따라, 온실가스를 감소시키기 위한 다양한 옵션들이 검토되고 있다. 그 중 전력산업의 발전부문은 온실가스를 배출하는 주요 원인으로서, 향후 온실가스 배출감소를 위한 노력이 요구되고 있다. 발전부문에서 석탄화력 부문은 특히 배출가스가 많은 발전원으로서 저렴한 발전원가로 인해 현재의 전원구성에서 차지하는 비중이 높은데, 배출가스 부문에 대한 규제가 강화되고, 이러한 요소가 비용화 될수록 타 발전원으로의 점진적인 대체가 요구된다. 본 논문은 전원구성 변화에 의한 배출권거래의 경제적 효과를 분석하고, 이러한 배출권 제약조건을 고려한 최적 전원구성을 산출하는 방법을 제안하고자 한다.