• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제11권7호
• /
• pp.271-279
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 공공의료기관의 인지도와 재방문여부와의 관계 및 영향을 미치는 요인을 살펴봄으로써 인지도를 높일 수 있는 방안을 제시하여 병원 재방문 증가에 기여하고자 하는데 그 의의가 있다. 분석방법은 빈도분석, 신뢰도 및 탐색적 요인분석, t-test, ANOVA, 상관관계분석, 위계적 다중회귀분석을 실시하여 결론을 도출하였다. 결과를 보면 상관관계분석에서는 재방문여부와 독립변수들간에 모두 유의한 상관관계를 보였고, 서비스품질인식 및 진료환경적 요인이 독립변수들의 설명력을 증가시켜 의료기관의 재방문과의 높은 관련성이 있음을 보여주고 있으며, 평소 이미지 및 의료서비스, 진료환경은 재방문의사에 긍정적인 영향을 미친다는 결과를 도출하였다. 본 연구를 통해서 공공의료기관의 인지도와 재방문과의 관련성을 확인 할 수 있었으며, 공공의료기관은 의료서비스 질과 인프라를 개선시키기 위해서 지속적으로 이미지 및 의료서비스, 진료환경에 대한 기대수준을 파악하여 재방문을 향상시킬 수 있는 대안 연구가 필요할 것이다.

• 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
• /
• 제41권5호
• /
• pp.479-485
• /
• 2018

Radiologic technologists working at the second and third medical institutions are classified as radiation-related workers and radiation workers according to their working departments, and are subject to double regulation by the Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Nuclear Safety Commission. We will try to understand the system of dualization and to understand the investigation of recognition. The dualized system of radiation-related workers and radiation workers includes the difference in name and terminology, the effective dose limit, the maintenance education and training of radiologic technologists, the period of medical examination, the radiation zone, dose of the woman whose pregnancy is confirmed in radiologic technologists, the qualification criteria of the safety officer, and the period of the regular inspection of the radiological equipment. In the questionnaire survey on the dualization system, there were various items showing significant differences between the radiation-related workers and radiation workers Overall, the radiation workers were more aware of the radiation workers' education and related terms than the radiation-related workers.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.275-289
• /
• 2011

Objectives : The recognition rate for issues and improving resolution for the recuperation income expense claim policy was examined. Methods : 1,135 copies of survey have been sent to the group of people who have claimed the dental recuperation income expense to dental recuperation institutions in Daejeon, Chungcheong Do that are registered to the health insurance evaluation and estimation office as of the May 2010 and 207 surveys that were regarded to be sincere for answering were analyzed. Results : Majority of respondence were belonged to the dentist institutions with more than 5 years of claim experiences as well as 10~50% of claim rate. The recognition of medical fee evaluation guideline was normal level, and negative recognition was higher to the health center with daily charge policy compare to the dental hospital and university affiliated dental center with treatment charge policy, Highest opinion for inappropriateness of dentist with significance was found (p<0.05). The openness of evaluation cases are regarded to be discharged through the transparent evaluation and most of the opinions for insurance claim evaluation adjustment are within the both 'Do not understand the evaluation guideline and program error of disease category, code and program' with significance(p<0.05). The reaction after the evaluation adjustment was high in reflection on the claim process after examining the reason for the evaluation adjustment through the evaluation and estimation office and university affiliated dental institution and dental center was regarded to be most active and deputy reclaimment was seemed to be most actively discharge the objection registration task (p<0.05). The claim error improving resolution recognition was highly prioritized to the accurate charting for the disease title and treatment description, improving the setting of claim program, and most highly recognized by the university affiliated dental hospital/dental center and comparably low by health center(p<0.05). and although the most of the responds of treatment description and browsing the medical fee was positive, 50% of dentists disagreed the idea so that this was creating a significant discrepancy with other groups(p<0.05). Conclusions : From this research, the recognition of medical fee evaluation guideline for dental (university) hospital and dentists were negative and high adjustment experience was examined as lacking of evaluation guideline understanding and error of disease name, code and programs and deputy reclaimment, university affiliated dental hospital/dental center were most actively handle the objection registration tasks and dentists have objection on the treatment description and browsing the treatment fee so that if these indexes can be referred to implement into the recuperation income claim process, this can be regarded to be a opportunity to create mutual credibility between recuperation institution, treatment pensioner and the evaluation institutions.