연구목적: 본 논문은 이러한 국가중요시설에서의 드론테러 위협과 대응실태를 분석하여 문제점을 도출함으로써 안티드론시스템을 실효적으로 활용하기 위한 법·제도적인 발전방안을 제시하는 데에 연구의 목적으로 두었다. 연구방법: 연구방법은 질적연구방법으로서 기존 선행연구논문, 정책자료 등에서 다루지 못한 다양한 문제점들을 전문가 심층면담을 통해 분석하였다. 심층면담을 위한 연구참여자는 국내 안티드론 및 테러분야 전문가 16명을 선정하여 반구조화 인터뷰 12개 문항을 토대로 진행하였다. 면담내용은 연구참여자들의 사전 동의 하에 녹취를 하고 이를 다시 한글파일로 전사한 후, 코딩작업을 통해 문제점 및 개선방안을 도출하였다. 이러한 토대를 만들기 위해 해외에서 발생한 드론테러 사례를 바탕으로 그 위협과 유형을 분석하고, 국내 드론테러 발생 개연성을 평가하여 안티드론시스템 구축방안을 법·제도적 관점에서 살펴보았다. 연구결과:연구결과 현재 우리나라 국가중요시설 드론테러에 대해 효과적으로 대응하기 위해서 선행되어야 할 몇 가지 문제점에 대한 개선사항이 식별되었다. 첫째, 국가중요시설 및 드론테러에 관한 용어를 명확히 재정립하여 이들을 ｢통합방위법｣ 및 ｢테러방지법｣등의 법률에 반영해야 한다. 둘째, 국가중요시설 방호개념을 현재의 지상위주의 방호에서 공중위협을 고려한 3차원적 방호개념으로 전환하고 안티드론시스템 구축에 관한 사항을 ｢통합방위법｣에 구체화하여 반영해야 한다. 셋째, ｢국가중요시설 상공에 대한 비행금지 특별법｣을 제정하는 것이다. 이를 위해 비행금지 대상시설 지정을 확대하되, 비행금지 설정범위는 최소화하여 '드론산업발전'과 '국가중요시설 보호'라는 양 날개가 균형적으로 발전할 수 있도록 법률을 개정해야 한다. 넷째, 불법비행 대응체계 정립 및 관련제도 개선이다. 예컨대 일반적인 사항에 대해서는 통일된 매뉴얼을 갖추되, 각 시설별 특성에 맞게 맞춤형으로 차별화하고 이에 대한 전문인력 확충, 대응훈련 강화 등을 통해 통해 철저한 대비를 해야 하다. 결론:본 연구의 결과에 따라, 향후 국가중요시설에서의 드론테러 및 불법드론에 대한 대응능력을 갖추고 안티드론시스템을 실효적으로 활용할 수 있도록 법 및 제도적인 뒷받침과 정책발전의 방향성을 제시하는데 함의가 있다고 할 수 있겠다.
Personalized services directly and indirectly acquire personal data, in part, to provide customers with higher-value services that are specifically context-relevant (such as place and time). Information technologies continue to mature and develop, providing greatly improved performance. Sensory networks and intelligent software can now obtain context data, and that is the cornerstone for providing personalized, context-specific services. Yet, the danger of overflowing personal information is increasing because the data retrieved by the sensors usually contains privacy information. Various technical characteristics of context-aware applications have more troubling implications for information privacy. In parallel with increasing use of context for service personalization, information privacy concerns have also increased such as an unrestricted availability of context information. Those privacy concerns are consistently regarded as a critical issue facing context-aware personalized service success. The entire field of information privacy is growing as an important area of research, with many new definitions and terminologies, because of a need for a better understanding of information privacy concepts. Especially, it requires that the factors of information privacy should be revised according to the characteristics of new technologies. However, previous information privacy factors of context-aware applications have at least two shortcomings. First, there has been little overview of the technology characteristics of context-aware computing. Existing studies have only focused on a small subset of the technical characteristics of context-aware computing. Therefore, there has not been a mutually exclusive set of factors that uniquely and completely describe information privacy on context-aware applications. Second, user survey has been widely used to identify factors of information privacy in most studies despite the limitation of users' knowledge and experiences about context-aware computing technology. To date, since context-aware services have not been widely deployed on a commercial scale yet, only very few people have prior experiences with context-aware personalized services. It is difficult to build users' knowledge about context-aware technology even by increasing their understanding in various ways: scenarios, pictures, flash animation, etc. Nevertheless, conducting a survey, assuming that the participants have sufficient experience or understanding about the technologies shown in the survey, may not be absolutely valid. Moreover, some surveys are based solely on simplifying and hence unrealistic assumptions (e.g., they only consider location information as a context data). A better understanding of information privacy concern in context-aware personalized services is highly needed. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to identify a generic set of factors for elemental information privacy concern in context-aware personalized services and to develop a rank-order list of information privacy concern factors. We consider overall technology characteristics to establish a mutually exclusive set of factors. A Delphi survey, a rigorous data collection method, was deployed to obtain a reliable opinion from the experts and to produce a rank-order list. It, therefore, lends itself well to obtaining a set of universal factors of information privacy concern and its priority. An international panel of researchers and practitioners who have the expertise in privacy and context-aware system fields were involved in our research. Delphi rounds formatting will faithfully follow the procedure for the Delphi study proposed by Okoli and Pawlowski. This will involve three general rounds: (1) brainstorming for important factors; (2) narrowing down the original list to the most important ones; and (3) ranking the list of important factors. For this round only, experts were treated as individuals, not panels. Adapted from Okoli and Pawlowski, we outlined the process of administrating the study. We performed three rounds. In the first and second rounds of the Delphi questionnaire, we gathered a set of exclusive factors for information privacy concern in context-aware personalized services. The respondents were asked to provide at least five main factors for the most appropriate understanding of the information privacy concern in the first round. To do so, some of the main factors found in the literature were presented to the participants. The second round of the questionnaire discussed the main factor provided in the first round, fleshed out with relevant sub-factors. Respondents were then requested to evaluate each sub factor's suitability against the corresponding main factors to determine the final sub-factors from the candidate factors. The sub-factors were found from the literature survey. Final factors selected by over 50% of experts. In the third round, a list of factors with corresponding questions was provided, and the respondents were requested to assess the importance of each main factor and its corresponding sub factors. Finally, we calculated the mean rank of each item to make a final result. While analyzing the data, we focused on group consensus rather than individual insistence. To do so, a concordance analysis, which measures the consistency of the experts' responses over successive rounds of the Delphi, was adopted during the survey process. As a result, experts reported that context data collection and high identifiable level of identical data are the most important factor in the main factors and sub factors, respectively. Additional important sub-factors included diverse types of context data collected, tracking and recording functionalities, and embedded and disappeared sensor devices. The average score of each factor is very useful for future context-aware personalized service development in the view of the information privacy. The final factors have the following differences comparing to those proposed in other studies. First, the concern factors differ from existing studies, which are based on privacy issues that may occur during the lifecycle of acquired user information. However, our study helped to clarify these sometimes vague issues by determining which privacy concern issues are viable based on specific technical characteristics in context-aware personalized services. Since a context-aware service differs in its technical characteristics compared to other services, we selected specific characteristics that had a higher potential to increase user's privacy concerns. Secondly, this study considered privacy issues in terms of service delivery and display that were almost overlooked in existing studies by introducing IPOS as the factor division. Lastly, in each factor, it correlated the level of importance with professionals' opinions as to what extent users have privacy concerns. The reason that it did not select the traditional method questionnaire at that time is that context-aware personalized service considered the absolute lack in understanding and experience of users with new technology. For understanding users' privacy concerns, professionals in the Delphi questionnaire process selected context data collection, tracking and recording, and sensory network as the most important factors among technological characteristics of context-aware personalized services. In the creation of a context-aware personalized services, this study demonstrates the importance and relevance of determining an optimal methodology, and which technologies and in what sequence are needed, to acquire what types of users' context information. Most studies focus on which services and systems should be provided and developed by utilizing context information on the supposition, along with the development of context-aware technology. However, the results in this study show that, in terms of users' privacy, it is necessary to pay greater attention to the activities that acquire context information. To inspect the results in the evaluation of sub factor, additional studies would be necessary for approaches on reducing users' privacy concerns toward technological characteristics such as highly identifiable level of identical data, diverse types of context data collected, tracking and recording functionality, embedded and disappearing sensor devices. The factor ranked the next highest level of importance after input is a context-aware service delivery that is related to output. The results show that delivery and display showing services to users in a context-aware personalized services toward the anywhere-anytime-any device concept have been regarded as even more important than in previous computing environment. Considering the concern factors to develop context aware personalized services will help to increase service success rate and hopefully user acceptance for those services. Our future work will be to adopt these factors for qualifying context aware service development projects such as u-city development projects in terms of service quality and hence user acceptance.