• 제목/요약/키워드: Tempormandibular disorders

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.016초

구강내과영역에서 측두하악장애 환자의 Spiral Taping 치료 (The Spiral Taping Treatment on Temporomandibular Disorder in oral Medicine)

  • 김명희;이정훈
    • Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
    • /
    • 제36권1호
    • /
    • pp.65-70
    • /
    • 2011
  • 최근 저작, 개구장애, 두경부의 동통 및 관절 잡음을 나타내는 턱관절 기능장애 환자가 점차 증가 추세에 있다. 그러나 대부분의 치료가 기간대비효과 및 지속성이 떨어지는 단점을 가지고 있다. 또한, 고비용과 장기간의 치료와 구강 장착물의 이물감으로 인한 불편감 등으로 좋은 치료법으로 선호되기 힘든 상황이다. 테이핑 치료방법은 시행하기가 비교적 간단하고 부작용이 없어 안정성이 높으면서도 치료효과가 탁월하다. 본 연구에서는 최근 비교적 쉽게 환자를 치료하고, 치료에 따른 부작용 없는 테이핑 요법 중 Spiral Taping법을 이용하여 턱관절의 통증과 관절가동범위의 제한을 일으키는 근육에 비신축성 테이프를 적용하여 측두하악장애의 효율적인 치료의 기본적인 방향을 설정하여 구체적인 치료방법과 치료절차에 대해 알아보고자 하였다.

측두하악관절증에서 자기공명영상을 이용한 측두하악관절의 관절강 평가 (Magnetic resonance imaging-based temporomandibular joint space evaluation in tempormandibular disorders)

  • 나경수
    • Imaging Science in Dentistry
    • /
    • 제37권1호
    • /
    • pp.15-18
    • /
    • 2007
  • Purpose : Disc and condylar position were observed on MRIs of temporomandibular joint disorder patients and condylar position agreement between MRI and tranascranal radiography was evaluated. Materials and Methods MRI and transcranial radiographs of both TM joints from 67 patients with temporemandibular disorder were used. On MRI, the position and shape of disc and condylar position as anterior, middle, posterior was evaluated at medial, center, and lateral views. On transcranial radiographs, condylar position was evaluated using the shortest distance from condyle to fossa in anterior, superior, and posterior directions. Results. 1. On MRI, 96 joints (71.6%) of 134 had anterior disc dispalcement with reduction and 38 joints (28.4%) without reduction. 2. Fourteen (14.6%) of 96 reducible joints showed anterior condylar position, 19 (19.8%) showed central position, 63 joints (65.6%) showed posterior position. Two joints (5.3%) of 38 non-reducible joints showed anterior condylar position, while 9 (23.7%) showed central position, and 27 (71.1%)-posterior position. 3. In 85 joints (63.4%) of 134, the transcranial condylar position agreed with that of the central MRI view, 10 joints (7.5%) with that of medial, 16 joints (11.9%) with that of lateral, and 23 joints (17.2%) disagreed with that of MRI. Conclusion : On MRT, most oi the reducible and non-reducible joints showed posterior condylar position. Transcranial radiographs taken with machine designed for TMJ had better agreement of condylar position with that of MRI. Extremely narrow joint spaces or very posterior condylar positions observed on transcranial radiographs had a little more than fifty percent agreement with those of MRIs.

  • PDF