• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제20권10호
• /
• pp.159-168
• /
• 2019

급격한 환경변화에 속에서 창의성이 조직 생존을 위한 경쟁우위 요인으로 강조된 이 후, 많은 학자들은 어떻게 하면 창의성을 향상시킬 수 있는지에 대해 관심을 가져왔다. 수많은 조직들이 효율적인 업무처리를 위해 팀 제를 도입하고 있는 현 상황에서 팀 창의성에 대한 관심 역시 증가하는 추세이다. 본 논문에서는 팀 창의성에 대한 이해를 목표로 팀 학습목표 지향성을 선행요인으로 고려한다. 특히, 팀 학습목표 지향성과 팀 창의성 사이의 관계를 설명하는 서로 다른 팀 프로세스(예, 팀 성찰, 팀 효능감, 긍정적 집단 정서 분위기(PGAT: Positive Group Affective Tone, 이하 PGAT))를 밝히는데 목적을 둔다. 본 연구의 분석 자료를 수집하기 위해 서울소재의 한 경영대학에서 개설하는 세 개의 경영학 전공 강좌의 수강생 187명(57개 팀)을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 위계적 회귀분석을 방법을 사용하여 자료를 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 팀 학습목표 지향성은 팀 창의성과 정(+)적으로 관련하는 것으로 나타났으며, 팀 성찰과 팀 효능감을 정(+)적으로 예측하였다. 또한, 팀 성찰과 팀 효능감은 팀 창의적 성과를 유의미하게 예측하였으며, 동시에 팀 학습목표 목표 지향성과 팀 창의성 사이를 매개하는 사실을 확인할 수 있었다. 하지만, 예측과 달리 PGAT는 팀 학습목표 지향성과 팀 창의성과는 통계적으로 관련성이 없는 것으로 나타났다. 이와 같은 본 연구 결과는 다양한 이론적, 실무적 시사점을 가진다.

• 대한한방소아과학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.121-140
• /
• 2018

Objectives This research was aimed to analyze and assess the articles of qualitative research of Pediatrics by following Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). Methods Two researchers analyzed and assessed the reports' quality and appropriateness based on COREQ guideline. The articles that failed to achieve consensus from the two researchers, the third researcher made a final decision. Results A total of fifty-six reports which used caregivers as participants, were selected and adopted qualitative research methods were chosen. In most qualitative studies, COREQ was not implemented. Some parts of the studies were poorly described and elaborated when reviewing them based on the COREQ guidelines. In the 'Research team and reflexivity', there was lack of description about the researcher. In the 'Study design', there were no detailed descriptions on the approaches they took in recruiting their study participants. There was not enough detail reflexivity participants who refused, and where the recruitment took place. There were also no records of whether there was a pilot test or a data saturation. In 'Analysis and findings' section, there were few articles mentioning Participant checking, and the main opinion of the participants were well analyzed in all the papers, but excluding opinions of few participants. Conclusions There are still many qualitative studies that have caregivers as participants, in the field of pediatrics. However, methodological skills are insufficient. The use of the COREQ guidelines should be further implemented for more robust and methodological improvement.

• 여성건강간호학회지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.321-332
• /
• 2012

Purpose: This research was aimed to analyze the reports of qualitative researches published in Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing (KJWHN). Methods: Twenty qualitative researches using in-depth interviews or focus groups published in KJWHN during from 2002 to 2011 were selected for analysis. Selected reports were analyzed by consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ), which were a reporting guideline for qualitative researches, and consisted of thirty two items and three domains, i.e., (1) research team and reflexivity, (2) study design, and (3) data analysis and reporting. Results: Personal characteristics related to credentials, gender and interviewer's bias or assumption were less reported than other items in the 1st domain. In the 2nd domain, descriptions such as a presence of non-participants, pilot test for interview guide development, and transcript return to participants were less reported than other items. In the 3rd domain, items related to number of data coder, participants checking of the finding, and clarity of minor themes were less reported than other items. Conclusion: It could be concluded that COREQ is a useful guideline for reporting of qualitative studies. From these results, we suggest that full items of COREQ should be considered and described when researchers report qualitative research.