• Title/Summary/Keyword: Tc-99m DISIDA

Search Result 52, Processing Time 0.019 seconds

Comparison of Gallbladder Emptying Induced by a Fatty Meal and an Infusion of Cholecystokinin (정상인에서 지방식 투여와 CCK 연속주입에 의한 담낭 수축의 비교 연구)

  • Ryu, Jin-Sook;Shin, Sang-Ki;Moon, Dae-Hyuk;Lee, Myung-Hae;Lee, Sung-Koo;Kim, Myung-Hwan;Min, Young-Il
    • The Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine
    • /
    • v.26 no.1
    • /
    • pp.86-94
    • /
    • 1992
  • Quantitative analysis of gallbladder emptying is important in diagnosis of motility disorder of gallbladder and in studies of biliary physiology. However, the normal range of gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) has not been determined yet and the best method for stimulating the gallbladder to contract has not been elucidated adequately. The purpose of this study was to compare the gallbladder emptying effect of the fatty meal ingestion with that of the continuous infusion of cholecystokinin (CCK) and to establish the normal GBSF values of normal subjects. Quantitative hepatobiliary scan with $^{99m}Tc-DISIDA$ after a fatty meal was performed for 22 normal healthy volunteers. Among them, 10 subjects repeated the test with a fatty meal. Again, for 7 subjects quantitative heaptobiliary scan with an infusion of CCK (sincalide) at a rate of 20 ng/kg/hr for 45 minutes was performed repeatedly. The results were as follows. 1) With a fatty meal, the mean GBEF was $89.6{\pm}8.2%$ in 22 normal subjects, and there was no difference between subjects. 2) With a continuous infusion of CCK, the mean GBEF was $62.4{\pm}16.6%$ in 7 normal subjects, and there was a significant difference between subjects(p<0.05). 3) The reproducibility of GBEF by a fatty meal was significantly higher than by an infusion of CCK (p < 0.05). 4) The mean GBEF by a fatty meal was significantly higher than that by an infusion of CCK (p < 0.05). We concluded that a fatty meal is superior to a continuous infusion of CCK for inducing gall-bladder contraction because that induces more complete emptying and the response is more reproducible and constant.

  • PDF

The Role of Hepatobiliary Scintiuaphy and Oral Cholecystography in Predicting the Performance of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (복강경담낭절제술에서 수술전 간담도신티그라피와 경구담낭조영술의 의의)

  • Won, Kyoung-Sook;Moon, Dae-Hyuk;Yang, Seoung-Oh;Han, Dong-Bok;Park, Cheol-Min;Lee, Moon-Gyu;Lee, Hee-Kyung;Park, Kwang-Min;Lee, Sung-Gyu;Ryu, Jin-Sook
    • The Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine
    • /
    • v.31 no.1
    • /
    • pp.102-107
    • /
    • 1997
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectorny can be performed safely in most patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Preoperative evaluation should assess the potential problems that affect the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy or oral cholecystography can assess the gallbladder function and nonvisualization of gallbladder usually indicates acute or severe chronic cholecystitis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of preoperative hepatobiliary scintigraphy or oral cholecystography in predicting the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectorny. The study group consists of 176 patients who underwent both hepatobiliary scintigraphy with Tc-99m DISIDA and oral cholecystography within one month before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Nonvisualization of gallbladder was defined as persistent nonvisualization of gallbladder until 4 hours on hepatobiliary scintigraphy or 12 hours on oral cholecystography. Among 176 patients, gallbladder was not visualized in 38 patients on hepatobiliary scintigraphy and 41 patients on oral cholecystography. Concordance rate between hepatobiliary scintigraphy and oral cholecystography was 89.2%. The conversion rate to open cholocystectomy was significantly higher in patients with nonvisualization of gallbladder than in patients with gallbladder visualization(15.8% vs 2.9% on hepatobiliary scintigraphy, 12.2% vs 3.7% on oral cholecystography p<0.01 and p<0.05 respectively). The operative complication rate was also significantly higher in patients with nonvisualization of gallbladder (13.2% vs 2.9% on hepatobiliary scintigraphy, 14.6% vs 2.2% on oral cholecystography p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively). Similarly, operation time was significantly prolonged in patients with nonvisualization of gallbladder ($88.8{\pm}41.9min$ vs $62.5{\pm}23.6min$ on hepatobiliary scintigraphy : p<0.001, $89.4{\pm}41.3$ min vs $61.8{\pm}22.8$ min on oral cholecystography : p<0.001). It is concluded that nonvisualization of gallbladder on hepatobiliary scintigraphy or oral cholecystography is a valuable preoperative clinical risk factor in predicting increased conversion rate to open cholecystectomy, increased operative complication and prolonged operation time.

  • PDF