• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.44 no.3
• /
• pp.27-48
• /
• 2022

This paper reconsiders the empirical evidence of the relationship between tax treaties and FDI using U.S. outbound FDI to 78 countries over the period of 2007-2018. Unlike previous studies, we explicitly consider differences in the tax environments of recipient economies, including their tax-haven status, transfer pricing rules, CFC rules and anti-avoidance regulations, in our estimations. Our results confirm the importance of controlling for country-specific tax environments, especially the tax-haven status and transfer pricing rules. We find that tax treaties positively contribute to FDI inflows in developing countries, while they have no statistically significant impacts on OECD countries. Recently signed tax treaties still foster FDI but less than older ones do. Finally, our results indicate, all other things being equal, that the weaker the transfer pricing regulations, the greater the amount of U.S. direct investment into a non-OECD economy.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.6 no.6
• /
• pp.117-124
• /
• 2006

Thanks to globalization and multi-corporations which have further created complex economic systems over the years, we are now experiencing new aspects of economic challenges as well. Any country abiding by law and order is required to have taxpayer's consent and cooperation upon levying taxes, however, taxpayers will resist or try to avoid paying taxes at all if they can. Particularly, it becomes easier for them to do by using tax haven wherever they we, and their endeavor is not likely to stop as long as they can. These kinds of actions have undoubtedly created tax loopholes which have in fact surfaced and brought to attention to many. Inevitably, each country aggressively pursuits to exchange tax information with others and cooperate each other Thus this study will look into various types of international tax avoidance cases and its root causes and focuses on ways to cooperate amongst nations. The study also suggests possible ways to develop and enhance international tax systems for all the parties concerned.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.19 no.8
• /
• pp.161-171
• /
• 2021

According to the equity home bias theory, foreign investors are considered to have less information than native investors. However, as the economy becomes liberalized and overseas economic innovation has a great influence on the local economy, it is possible for foreign investors to invest as informed traders. This study analyzes whether information on trade amount by nationality has specific characteristics. The findings are summarized as follows. First, the increase in trading by foreign investors has negative effects on stock returns. There is no significant difference in these negative effects by nationality. This means that foreign investors show strong herd behavior regardless of nationality. Second, foreigners' investment activities increase stock price volatility, but the impact is not significant. Third, the behavior of foreign investors is still positive feedback. However, there are signs that positive feedback behavior may be changing, especially for funds from the United States and the Cayman Islands. Finally, tax haven zone funds have different investment strategies than other foreign investors. However, Cayman Islands funds, which are estimated to be closely related to Korea, are different from Luxembourg and Ireland funds. These findings undermine the fundamentals of the equity home bias theory.