• Title/Summary/Keyword: Taste discrimination

검색결과 33건 처리시간 0.019초

한국, 중국, 일본, 미국산 시판 사과식초의 관능적 품질 비교를 위한 SPME-GC/MS, 전자코 및 전자혀 분석 (Comparative analysis of sensory profiles of commercial cider vinegars from Korea, China, Japan, and US by SPME/GC-MS, E-nose, and E-tongue)

  • 조윤희;구송이;정남혁;까오야핑;김호진;정민희;정용진;권중호
    • 한국식품과학회지
    • /
    • 제48권5호
    • /
    • pp.430-436
    • /
    • 2016
  • 본 연구에서는 한국, 중국, 일본 및 미국산 시판 천연발효 사과식초의 객관적인 향미특성 평가를 위해 SPME-GC/MS, 전자코, 전자혀 및 관능적 분석 특성을 비교하였다. SPME-GC/MS 분석결과, 시판 사과식초의 공통된 휘발성분은 acetic acid 외 isovaleric acid, octanoic acid, phenethyl alcohol, phenethyl acetate 등으로 확인되었다. 한편, 한국산 식초에는 acid류가, 미국산 식초에는 acetic ester류가 주된 향기성분으로 확인되었고, 중국산 식초에는 ethyl acetate 성분이 높은 비율로 확인된 반면, 일본산에서는 acetic acid 비율이 낮았다. 한국산 및 중국산 식초는 전자코 패턴에서 독립된 패턴으로 구분되었고, 모든 식초에서 높은 함량으로 분리된 성분은 Kovats 분석을 통해 acetic acid로 예측되었다. 중국산 및 일본산 식초는 전자혀 분석에서 각각 뚜렷한 맛 패턴의 분리를 나타내었다. 관능평가에서 신맛이 높게 평가된 식초는 전반적 기호도에서 비교적 높은 평점을 보여주었고, 관능적 냄새, 신맛 및 단맛 항목은 각각 전자코 분석의 PC1, 전자혀의 SRS sensor 및 SWS sensor 값과 $r^2=0.83$ 이상의 높은 상관계수를 나타내었다. 이상의 결과, 시판 사과식초는 전자코 및 전자혀 패턴 분석을 통해 한국, 중국, 일본 및 미국산 시료로 구분될 수 있었고, 관능적 평점은 E-sense 분석결과와 높은 상관성을 보여주어, 관능검사를 대체할 전자코 및 전자혀 분석의 활용가능성을 확인하였다.

전자혀를 이용한 객관적 상대 단맛 측정 (Objective and Relative Sweetness Measurement by Electronic-Tongue)

  • 박소연;나선영;오창환
    • 문화기술의 융합
    • /
    • 제8권6호
    • /
    • pp.921-926
    • /
    • 2022
  • Astree사의 E-Tongue을 이용한 상대적 단맛 평가를 위하여 검토한 7개의 센서 중 PKS 및 NMS 센서가 1차로 선정되었다. PKS 및 NMS 센서를 이용해 설탕을 비롯한, 과당, 포도당 및 자일리톨, 5%, 10% 및 15% 용액을 분석한 결과, 자일리톨 및 과당의 농도 증가에 따른 PKS 센서 감응도의 변화가 미미하여, 최종적으로 NMS 센서를 단맛 측정 센서로 선정하였다. 이들 감미료의 농도 중 5% 용액을 모든 센서를 활용한 PCA(주성분 분석) 통계 방법으로 처리한 결과에서는 DI (식별지수)값이 -0.1로 감미료 상호 간 구분이 힘들었으나, NMS 센서만을 이용한 상대적 센서 감응도는 농도에 관계없이 일정한 수치를 나타내었다. 과당 및 자일리톨의 상대적 센서 감응도는 각각 1.08 및 1.00으로 사람의 미각으로 측정한 문헌상 관능검사의 상대적 감미도 범위에 포함되었으나, 포도당의 경우는 0.99로 문헌상 상대감미도 0.5~0.75보다 높게 나타났다. 5%~15% 농도 범위에서 설탕 대비 3종 감미료에 대한 NMS 단일센서를 이용한 E-Tongue의 우수한 정밀성 (%RSD, 1.53~3.64%)을 고려할 때 향후 가당 음료 등에 대한 신제품 개발 및 품질관리 등에 관능검사를 대체할 수 있는 가능성을 확인하였다.

한국장신구의 사치 금제 고찰 (A Study on Luxury Prohibition of Korean Personal Ornaments)

  • 추원교
    • 디자인학연구
    • /
    • 제2권1호
    • /
    • pp.43-62
    • /
    • 1989
  • The luxury is the expression of human being's ornament instinct. In this study, in order to grasp the moulding system of the Korean's personal ornaments, the process of luxury prohibition was reviewed to search for to which direction the ornaments developed in the frame of the prohibited style connected closely to the character of the personal ornaments. The proiod was fixed from the old society to the late Chosun dynasty era. The beginning of the luxury in Korea seems to be the start of the luxury burial at the time of funeral in the age of Koguryo., In the era of Koguryo, 10th year of King Dongmyung (B. C. 28), in the era of Baekje, 27th year of King Koi(260), the prohibition of dress regulation and the style of dress were conducted. The prohibition of personal ornaments in Silla was started from King Bup:Heung, and in the 9th year of King Heung-Duk, the prohibition was conducted in order to correct the luxury of the nobles and set up the social discipline. In the 11 th of King Il-Sung-Ni-Sa-Kum, the use of gold, silver and jade was prohibited in the civilian circles. The prohibition of Silla was succeeded to Koryo era, and in the 7th year of King Kwangjong(956), the system of Baekgwan Gongbok(uniform for government officials) was set up, and the system of Sasek Gongbok(four color official uniform) was set up in the 11 th year of the same King, and the prohibition of the personal ornaments such as crown and band is considred to have been conducted. The prohibition of gold and silver was conducted in the first year of King Sungjong(982), and in the 4th year of King Chungryul(l260), the order of wearing the dress and hat in accordance with the Yusan dynasty and the Mongolian customs were widely circulated in the royal court and vivilian circles. The strong influence of Mongolia made the taste of the traditional personal ornaments laste. The personal ornaments were used for the nobles until the age of the Unified Sillar but even the common people could use them in case they were rich, and such a circumstances made the use of foreign goods inflated. The prohibition of Koryo era was aimed at the prohibition of the foreign goods of luxury, and the classification of the social status.In the age of Chosun Dynasty, the production of gold and silver was feeble indeed but the oute reason of the prohibition was to eradicate the luxurious tendency, elevate the custom of eradicate the luxurious tendency, elevate the custom of thrift, and moreover, the gold, silver and jade were no the products of Korea and the prohibition was conducted but the true reason was afor the tribute tt China and the classification of status. The prohibition of Chosun dynasty was conducted first in the June of the 3rd year of King Taejo The major contents of prohibition was no use of gold, silver and jade, coral, agate, amber, etc. of th, wives of the Dang-Sang-Kwan (Court Nobleman) or their sons and daughters, and the same pheno menon was common even at the time of marriage. The people engaged in the secret trade there of wert beheaded. The personal ornaments in the prohibition were the pendent trinket, Binyo (crossbar) ceremonial ornamental hat, ring, earring, ornamental knife, hat string, hat ornament, belt, etc. Thl luxurious marriage expenses out of the luxury was severe, and lose of the marriageable age because 0 non-preparing the marriage goods was the national evil. The prohibition oC luxury was hard to bt kept to the nobles or rich people, the same as old days and present days. The prohibition of th{ luxury and personal ornaments of Korea had nothing to do with the commons, and it was limited tc the nobles and rich people. The prohibition was aimed to cultivating the custom of frugality by eradicating the luxurious atmosphere, but it was chiefly due to the tribute to the China and tht discrimination of the. status. We can say that the recent personal ornament was the flower of handi craft industry bloomed in the prohibition and regulation.

  • PDF