• The Journal of Korean Society for Radiation Therapy
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.45-53
• /
• 1995

목적 : 뇌정위 방사선수술은 AVM(ateriovenous malformation)이나 작은 크기의 종양에 1회에 고선량의 방사선을 조사하는 기술이다. 선형가속기를 이용한 방사선 수술을 하기 위하여 최근 본원에 설치한 Philips SL 75-5 선형가속기와 isocentric sub system(ISS)에 의한 뇌정위 방사선 수술에 있어서 표적의 위치선정과, gantry와 couch의 회전시 기하학적 오차가 중요시 되는데 isocentric sub system의 오차를 분석 하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 방사선원으로는 Philips SL 75-5 선형가속기의 5MV 광자선을 사용하였고, 원형의 작은 광자선속을 위하여 isocenter에서의 직경이 26mm인 secondary cone을 gimbal baaring에 삽입하여 사용하였다. 표적의 크기와 좌표를 정하기 위하여 CT나 angio localizer를 이용하고, 표적좌표 선정을 위하여 BRW phantom base와 target pointer를 이용하여 임의의 BRW-coordinator를 바꾸어 가면서 gantry angle와 ISS head 각도를 임의로 바꾸어 가면서 film에 방사선을 조사하였다. 흑화된 film을 view box 위에 놓고 광학판독기구로 film 가장자리의 오차를 scale 확대경으로 측정하여 오차를 분석하였다. 결과 : 표적좌표 선정의 정확도를 확인하기 위하여 임의의 표적좌표에 gantry의 10개각도 ISShead의 10개각도에서 각각 광자선을 조사시켜 film을 이용하여 오차를 측정한 결과 collimator cone의 직경이 26mm일때 전체 평균오차가 0.219+-0.03mm이었다. 결론 : Isocentric sub system은 gantry head와 ISS arm 사이에 gimbal bearing이 있어서 이 부위를 flexible하게 연결함으로 gantry의 회전에 무관하게 정확한 isocenter를 유지시켜 주고 ISS head는 couch와 독립되어 움직이므로 isocentric sub system isocenter의 오차를 최대한 줄일수 있음을 알았다.

• Progress in Medical Physics
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.99-107
• /
• 2003

This study was performed to prepare the verification film for localizing beam-target position with the Photon Knife radiosurgery system (PKRS) using linear accelerator(Mitsubishi, Model ML-15MDX). We developed a laser calibration system using a reticle of transparent lucite to detect Inlet and outlet beams. We verified fixation of the second collimator with film mounted on a holder in the shape of an octagon block 5cm apart from the isocenter. The film was exposed to photon beams of linear accelerator at an interval of 45 degrees during the gantry movement. There were no shifts in the beam of the second collimator during gantry movement. We used a position marker which is designed a head-shaped small lead block and a 10 mm in diameter of steel bead in the plastic tube. The position marker helped to verify the beam directions with patient position in multi-arc and trans-multi-arc of PKRS The verification of beam alignments showed an average 0.8$\pm$0.26 mm discrepancy in LINAC-gram images of PKRS. In our study, the couch movement was $\pm$5 mm laterally, while it shook $\pm$ 2 mm toward the couch axis. The couch, however, was immediately returned to the initial site after shaking. Thus, we postulate that the beam-target position(s) should be verified with LINAC-gram in a stereotactic radiosurgery system to achieve the accuracy of beam-target alignment.

• The Journal of Korean Society for Radiation Therapy
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.27-33
• /
• 2007

Purpose: We have performed SRS (stereotactic radiosurgery) for avm (arterry vein malformation) and brain cancer. In order to verify dose and localization of SRS, dose distributions from TPS ($X-Knife^{(R)}$ 3.0, Radionics, USA) and GafChromic $EBT^{(R)}$ film in a head phantom were compared. Materials and Methods: In this study, head and neck region of conventional humanoid phantom was modified by substituting one of 2.5 cm slap with five 0.5 cm acrylic plates to stack the GafChromic $EBT^{(R)}$ film slice by slice with 5 mm intervals. Four films and five acrylic plates were cut along the contour of head phantom in axial plane. The head phantom was fixed with SRS head ring and adapted SRS localizer as same as real SRS procedure. CT images of the head phantom were acquired in 5 mm slice intervals as film interval. Five arc 6 MV photon beams using the SRS cone with 2 cm diameter were delivered 300 cGy to the target in the phantom. Ten small pieces of the film were exposed to 0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 cGy, respectively to calibrate the GafChromic $EBT^{(R)}$ film. The films in the phantom were digitized after 24 hours and its linearity was calibrated. The pixel values of the film were converted to the dose and compared with the dose distribution from the TPS calculation. Results: Calibration curve for the GafChromic $EBT^{(R)}$ film was linear up to 900 cGy. The R2 value was better than 0.992. Discrepancy between calculated from $X-Knife^{(R)}$ 3.0 and measured dose distributions with the film was less than 5% through all slices. Conclusion: It was possible to evaluate every slice of humanoid phantom by stacking the GafChromic EBT film which is suitable for 2 dimensional dosimetry, It was found that film dosimetry using the GafChromic $EBT^{(R)}$ film is feasible for routine dosimetric QA of stereotactic radiosurgery.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.84-88
• /
• 1999

Purpose :To develop a method for verifying a treatment setup in stereotactic radiotherapy by ma- tching portal images to DRRs. Materials and Methods : Four pairs of orthogonal portal images of one patient immobilized by a thermoplastic mask frame for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy were compared with DRRs. Portal images are obtained in AP (anteriorfposterior) and lateral directions with a target localizer box containing fiducial markers attached to a stereotactic frame. DRRs superimposed over a planned iso-center and fiducial markers are printed out on transparent films. And then, they were overlaid over onhogonal penal images by matching anatomical structures. From three different kind of objects (isgcenter, fiducial markers, anatomical structure) on DRRs and portal images, the displacement error between anatomical structure and isocenters (overall setup error), the displacement error between anatomical structure and fiducial markers (irnrnobiliBation error), and the displacement error between fiducial markers and isocenters (localization error) were measured. Results : Localization error were 1.5$\pm$0.3 mm (AP), 0.9$\pm$0.3 mm (lateral), and immobilization errors were 1.9$\pm$0.5 mm (AP), 1.9$\pm$0.4 mm (lateral). In addition, overall setup errors were 1.0$\pm$0.9 mm (AP), 1.3$\pm$0.4 mm (lateral). From these orthogonal displacement errors, maximum 3D displacement errors($\sqrt{(\DeltaAP)^{2}+(\DeltaLat)^{2}$)) were found to be 1.7$\pm$0.4 mm for localization, 2.0$\pm$0.6 mm for immobilization, and 2.3$\pm$0.7 mm for overall treatment setup. Conclusion : By comparing orthogonal portal images with DRRs, we find out that it is possible to verify treatment setup directly in stereotactic radiotherapy.