• Journal of Nutrition and Health
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.41-48
• /
• 2011

Constructs with seven latent evaluation indicators and 18 observable survey questions were developed by food and nutrition experts to calculate a food safety recognition and practice index for children. The purpose of this study was to suggest statistical approaches to test construction validity on the constructs, obtain weights of the evaluation indicators, and develop questionnaires to calculate a children's food recognition and practice index. Survey data of 2,400 elementary fifth grade students were used as empirical results. Test validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis and confirmed to be highly significant by confirmatory factor analysis [i.e., linear structural relations (LISREL) analysis]. Standardized path coefficients of the LISREL analysis were suggested based on weights, and the weights were compared using the AHP and Delphi methods.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.1021-1029
• /
• 2010

중소기업의 조사부담 완화를 위하여 2009년부터 기존의 "중소기업실태조사", "중소기업인력실태 조사" 및 "중소기업사업전환실태조사"를 통합하여 하나의 조사로 수행하게 되었다. 통합 중소기업실태조사를 위한 새로운 표본설계에서 중소제조업과 지식기반서비스업 부문이 너무 상이하므로 별개의 모집단을 구성하였으며, 전체 표본수는 10,000개로 하였다. 변동계수를 사용한 배분공식으로 1차 층인 종사자규모 산업분류별로 표본을 배분하고 루트비례배분을 사용하여 2차 층인 지역별로 표본의 크기를 결정하였다. 새로운 표본설계에서는 가중치를 계산하였고 이를 이용한 추정량과 추정오차 공식을 유도하여 기존의 단순집계를 벗어나 종사자 규모별, 업종별 그리고 지역별 추정과 추정의 정도에 대한 평가를 가능하게 하였다.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.139-153
• /
• 2002

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is known as a very useful decision-making model developed for obtaining the relative weights of alternatives through pairwise comparison in the context of hierarchical structure. In this paper, we propose a method to reflect the reliability of evaluators in the process of pairwise comparison. This method is applied to the evaluation of aerospace technology alternatives. We have conducted a questionnaire survey for S company that is one of the representative aerospace companies in Korea. A questionnaire was designed for obtaining both the priority with considering the reliability of evaluators' importance weights (the modified AHP priority) and the priority with assuming equally reliable evaluators' importance weights (the AHP priority) in order to compare the priority derived by each of two methods. The result shows that there exists the difference hard to neglect between the final priorities gained by two methods.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.443-449
• /
• 2017

Estimation of population proportion like the distribution rate of LED TV and the prevalence of a disease are often estimated based on survey sample data. Population proportion is generally considered as a special form of population mean. In complex sampling like stratified multistage sampling with unequal probability sampling, the denominator of mean may be random variable and it is estimated like ratio estimator. In this research, we examined the estimation of distribution rate based on stratified multistage sampling, and determined some numerical outcomes using stratified random sample data with about 25% of missing observations. In the data used for this research, the survey weight was determined by deterministic way. So, the weights are not random variable, and the population distribution rate and its variance estimator can be estimated like population mean estimation. When the weights are not random variable, if one estimates the variance of proportion estimator using ratio method, then the variances may be inflated. Therefore, in estimating variance for population proportion, we need to examine the structure of data and survey design before making any decision for estimation methods.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.181-190
• /
• 2014

Background: Demands are recently rising for the securement of procedural justification of policy decision-making. This study aims to improve the procedure of making a decision to expand health insurance benefit package from the perspective of building a social consensus. Methods: Major priority principles were firstly derived through literature search. Weights for such principles were calculated through an analytic hierarchy process, based upon the survey conducted for the health policy experts. Priority for 11 non-covered services was assessed by applying the weights as above to the results of the questionnaire survey targeted at people including members of related committees or societies. Results: Weights for priority principles were in the order of 'severity/urgency (0.428)', 'cost-effectiveness (0.318)', 'substitutability (0.164),' and 'accountability (0.090)'. What was obtained by applying these weights to the results of the questionnaire survey was considerably in line with what health experts classified those items into 3 groups depending on their own judgement of service necessity (consistent with 9 services out of 11). Conclusion: Results of the study are suggestive as to how far a brief assessment by experts could be utilized in case there are constraints on time and expenses in implementing all the process to secure procedural justification. Various attempts and endeavors need to be made to secure procedural justification that will not mar efficiency of decision-making in the days to come.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.95-111
• /
• 2012

광양항 이용고객을 대상으로 2005년 이후 광양항 컨테이너부두 서비스품질 조사가 수행되었다. 광양항 조사의 분석결과는 서비스 평가체계 중 가장 중요한 서비스차원간의 가중치 산정절차가 수립되지 않아 연차별 또는 경쟁항만 간 정확한 비교가 어려웠다. 특히 가중치 산정에 전문적으로 활용되는 계층분석법에 의한 산정결과가 연차별로 특정 평가항목에 대해서는 90%이상씩 변동하는 등 안정성이 매우 낮아 비교가 불가능했다. 이에 본 연구는 광양항 항만 서비스기업의 품질평가체계를 발전시켜 비용 및 시간 효과적인 품질평가 및 관리 체계의 수립을 지원하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 광양항 이용고객들을 대상으로 2007년~2009년 설문 자료에 확인적 요인분석을 적용하여 서비스품질 평가를 위한 연차별로 안정적이며 비교 가능한 가중치를 사후적으로 산정하는 방법을 제시하고 산정하였다. 새롭게 제안된 방법은 설문항목을 줄이면서 보다 과학적이고 정확한 서비스품질 평가체계를 구축할 수 있게 해주었다. 이 연구를 활용하여 서비스품질을 정확하게 측정할 수 있게 되면, 기간별 및 선도기업과 비교를 통해 항만기업의 경쟁력을 높일 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.79-95
• /
• 2003

This paper investigates how the weights of performance measures vary depending on corporate life cycle, such as birth, growth, maturity, revival, and decline. Balanced Scorecard performance measures are employed for this investigation. Balanced Scorecard has been widely used for measuring a corporate Performance by incorporating financial and non-financial measures simultaneously. Because these performance measures are related to the compensation and promotion of employees, research of weights of performance measures would be instrumental. Questionnaires from 218 companies are analyzed. Depending on the corporate life cycle, our survey results demonstrate that the weights of the business Performance measures differ In the four Perspectives - financial. customer, Internal Process, and learning/growth. Our results can be used for enhancing the Duality of performance measurement systems.