• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.64-76
• /
• 2001

Despite the improvements in bond strengths of dentin adhesives and resin-modified glass ionomers, the marginal seal of cervical restorations remains a concern. Microleakage at poorly sealed margins can result in staining, post-operative sensitivity, pulpal irritation, and recurrent caries. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface penetrating sealant(SPS) on the microleakage of cervical restorations. 45 extracted human teeth were selected, and Class V preparations were prepared on the both buccal and lingual surface of the teeth to the following dimensions : 1.5mm axially, 3mm mesiodistally, and 3mm incisogingivally. After cervical restoration with composite resin, compomer, glass ionomer each restoration was treated as three methods: No Tx., Scotchbond Multipurpose Adhesive$^{\circledR}$, Fortify$^{\circledR}$. The sections were examined with a stereomicroscope to determine the extent of microleakage at enamel and dentin margins. The results of this study were as follows. 1. All groups showed some microleakage. 2. Gingival cavity wall with cementum margin showed significantly higher leakage value than occlusal cavity wall with enamel margin. 3. The group treated with SPS showed significantly lower leakage value than no treated group(p<0.05). But there is no difference between Fortify$^{\circledR}$ and Scotchbond Multipurpose adhesive$^{\circledR}$. The results of this study suggest that SPS are effective in reducing microleakage of class V restorations. But it is certain that some microleakage still occurred despite the application of SPS.

• Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.633-642
• /
• 2006

This study evaluated the surface changes such as surface average roughness(RA), surface free energy(SFE) and wear depth among groups treated with surface penetrating sealant(Fortify, Biscover), non treated polishing group before and after tooth-brushing, analyzing the influence of the sealants in filling of surface microdefects formed during the finishing and polishing procedures of composite resin. Results were as follow(p= 0.05) : 1. Ra was increased Biscover. Fortify and Polishing group. Before abrasion and in 6 months, all groups were statistically significant. In 1 month, 2 months and 3 months no statistical difference was noticed between Fortify and Biscover 2. SFE of Polishig and Biscover group. Fortify and Biscover group were statistically significant before abrasion. SFE of Polishing and Fortify group was statistically significant in 1 month. No statistical difference was noticed among groups in 2 months. SFE of Fortify and Biscover group was statistically significant in 3 months. Polishing and Fortify group, Fortify and Biscover group were statistically significant in 6 months. 3, Wear rate between Polishing and Fortify group was statistically significant in only 1 month. Wear rate between Polishing and Biscover group was statistically different in each month except for 2 month and so it was between Fortify and Biscover group. Considering film thickness of Fortify and Biscover, Fortify almost discappeared after 2 months and Biscover did after 6 months.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• v.32 no.3
• /
• pp.180-190
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the abrasion resistance of surface penetrating sealant which was applied on a composite resin restoration and to provide proper time to reapply sealant on composite resin surface. Two hundred rectangular specimens, sized $8\times3\times2mm$, were made of Micronew (Bisco, Inc., Schaumburg, IL, U.S.A) and divided into two groups; F group (n = 10) was finished with coarse and medium grit of Sof-Lex discs and BisCoverwas applied B group (n = 190) after finishing with discs. B group was again subdivided into nineteen subgroups From B-1 group to B-18 group were subjected to toothbrush abrasion test using a distilled water-dentifrice slurry and toothbrush heads B-IM group was not subjected to toothbrush abrasion test. Average surface roughness (Ra) of each group was calculated using a surface roughness tester (Surfcorder MSE-1700: Kosaka Laboratory Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) . A representative specimen of each group was examined by FE-SEM (S-4700: Hitachi High Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan). The data were analysed using cluster analysis, paired t-test, and repeated measure ANOVA. The results of this study were as follows; 1. Ra off group was $0.898{\pm}0.145{\mu}m$ and B-IM group was $0.289{\pm}0.142{\mu}m$. Ra became higher from B-1 group $(0.299{\pm}0.48{\mu}m$ to B-18 group $(0.642{\pm}0.313{\mu}m$. 2. Final cluster center of Ra was $0.361{\mu}m$ in cluster 1 $(B-IM\simB-7)$, $0.511{\mu}m$ in cluster 2 $(B-8\simB-14)$ and $0.624{\mu}m$ in cluster 3 ($(B-15\simB-18)$. There were significant difference among Ra of three clusters. 3 Ra of B-IM group was decreased 210.72% than Ra of F group. Ra of B-8 group and B-15 group was increased 35.49% and 51.35% respectively than Ra of B-IM group. 4. On FE-SEM, B-IM group showed the smoothest resin surface. B-8 group and B-15 group showed vertically shallow scratches , and wide and irregular vertical scratches on composite resin surface respectively. Within a limitation of this study, finished resin surface will be again smooth and glazy if BisCover would be reapplied within 8 to 14 months after applying to resin surface.