• 대한한방내과학회지
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.306-317
• /
• 2004

Background & Object : Dyspepsia for which no organic causes are disclosed is referred to as functional dyspepsia. Functional dyspepsia is here studied in connection with a biopsychosocial model. From the aspect of individual response to external environment, in connection with stress response, functional dyspepsia is studied by both the psychology department and the internal medicine departments. The disease is taken as approachable from the aspect of internal injury due to seven emotions and stress as differentiated by Oriental medicine. Materials and Methods : Targeted at 223 patients underwent medical checks and endoscopy at Kangnam Korean Hospital, Kyunghee University. They agreed to join this clinical experiment. Stress response inventory, GARS (global assessment of recent stress scale), GSRS (gastrointestinal symptom rating scale), diagnostic scores for Ki-depression, and Spleen Disease Differentiation of Syndromes were all measured and evaluated. The test group was comprised of functional dyspepsia patients. The control group was comprised of nonsymptomatic chronic gastritis patients who were found to suffer from chronical gastritis in endoscopy and thus could be diagnosed with functional dyspepsia if symptoms would arise, but did not complain of subjective symptoms. Results showed these corelations: Functional dyspepsia patients were found to have more serious Ki-depression compared to nonsymptomatic chronic gastritis patients. The more serious Ki-depression the more serious the dyspepsia symptoms. The higher the stress response inventory the more serious the dyspepsia. Deficiency of spleen Eum, and Deficiency and Sinking of spleen Gi were found to coincide with serious Ki-depression.

• 대한지역사회영양학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.280-295
• /
• 2021

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the characteristics of patients according to their nutritional status as assessed by five nutritional screening tools: Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), NUTRISCORE, Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) and to compare the agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of these tools. Methods: A total of 952 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy and chemotherapy from January 2009 to December 2012 at the Samsung Medical Center were included. We categorized patients into malnourished and normal according to the five nutritional screening tools 1 month after surgery and compared their characteristics. We also calculated the Spearman partial correlation, Cohen's Kappa coefficient, the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of each pair of screening tools. Results: We observed 86.24% malnutrition based on the PG-SGA and 85.82% based on the NUTRISCORE among gastric cancer patients in our study. When we applied NRI or CONUT, however, the malnutrition levels were less than 30%. Patients with malnutrition as assessed by the PG-SGA, NUTRISCORE, or NRI had lower intakes of energy and protein compared to normal patients. When NRI, PNI, or CONUT were used to identify malnutrition, lower levels of albumin, hemoglobin, total lymphocyte count, total cholesterol, and longer postoperative hospital stays were observed among patients with malnutrition compared to those without malnutrition. We found relatively high agreement between PG-SGA and NUTRISCORE; sensitivity was 90.86% and AUC was 0.78. When we compared NRI and PNI, sensitivity was 99.64% and AUC was 0.97. AUC ranged from 0.50 to 0.67 for comparisons between CONUT and each of the other nutritional screening tools. Conclusions: Our study suggests that PG-SGA and NRI have a relatively high agreement with the NUTRISCORE and PNI, respectively. Further cohort studies are needed to examine whether the nutritional status assessed by PG-SGA, NUTRISCORE, NRI, PNI, and CONUT predicts the gastric cancer prognosis.

• 대한지역사회영양학회지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.205-222
• /
• 2022

Objectives: This study examined the characteristics of patients according to nutritional status assessed by five nutritional screening tools: Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), NUTRISCORE, Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) and to compare the agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of these tools. Methods: A total of 952 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy and chemotherapy from January 2009 to December 2012 were included. The patients were categorized into malnutrition and normal status according to five nutritional screening tools one month after surgery. The Spearman partial correlation, Cohen's Kappa coefficient, the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of each two screening tools were calculated. Results: Malnutrition was observed in 86.24% of patients based on the PG-SGA and 85.82% based on the NUTRISCORE. When NRI or CONUT were applied, the proportions of malnutrition were < 30%. Patients with malnutrition had lower intakes of energy and protein than normal patients when assessed using the PG-SGA, NUTRISCORE, or NRI. Lower levels of albumin, hemoglobin, total lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol and longer postoperative hospital stays were observed among patients with malnutrition compared to normal patients when NRI, PNI, or CONUT were applied. Relatively high agreement for NUTRISCORE relative to PG-SGA was found; the sensitivity was 90.86%, and the AUC was 0.78. When NRI, PNI, and CONUT were compared, the sensitivities were 23.72% for PNI relative to NRI, 44.53% for CONUT relative to NRI, and 90.91% for CONUT relative to PNI. The AUCs were 0.95 for NRI relative to PNI and 0.91 for CONUT relative to PNI. Conclusions: NUTRISCORE had a high sensitivity compared to PG-SGA, and CONUT had a high sensitivity compared to PNI. NRI had a high specificity compared to PNI. This relatively high sensitivity and specificity resulted in 77.00% agreement between PNI and CONUT and 77.94% agreement between NRI and PNI. Further cohort studies will be needed to determine if the nutritional status assessed by PG-SGA, NUTRISCORE, NRI, PNI, and CONUT predicts the gastric cancer prognosis.

• 대한영양사협회학술지
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.217-226
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to investigate initial nutritional status of stomach cancer patients. The study subjects were 88 patients with stomach cancer admitted at Kosin University Gospel Hospital in Busan. We assessed the initial nutritional status by anthropometric, biochemical and dietary intake data along with subjective global assessment(SGA). The results are as follows. 1. The mean age, weight, height, triceps skinfold thickness, mid arm circumference, and mid arm muscle circumference of the subjects were 55.9$\pm$11.0years, 60.0$\pm$9.8kg, 162.4$\pm$8.5cm, 10.9$\pm$5.7mm, 26.8$\pm$3.8cm, and 23.4$\pm$3.5cm respectively. The mean body mass index was within the normal range, with 22.7$\pm$2.8kg/m2, while 15.4% of the patients was underweight. The result shows that body fat mass and body protein mass of the patients with stomach cancer were decreased. 2. The mean biochemical data of the subjects were 4.0$\pm$0.5g/dl for albumin, 174.7$\pm$41.9mg/dl for cholesterol, 107.6$\pm$57.2mg/dl for triglyceride, 92.1μg/dl for Zn, 　297.0$\pm$103.1mg/dl for transferrin, 1980.0$\pm$0.8$mm^3$ for total lymphocyte count. 3. Daily energy intake was 1997.8$\pm$579.3kcal. And the ratio of carbohydrate, protein, and lipid to energy intake was 72:14:14. 4. The patients were divided into three groups according to SGA performed by an observer. Group A(well nourished) was 55.7% with 49 patients, Group B(moderately malnourished) was 22.7 % with 20 patients, and Group C(severely malnourished) was 21.6 % with 19 patients. The three groups showed a significant difference in body weight(p<0.01), 1 month weight loss %(p<0.001), 6 months weight loss %(p<0.001), body mass index(p<0.01), and mid arm circumference(p<0.05), albumin(p<0.01), energy intake(p<0.05) as well as carbohydrate intake(p<0.05). From these results, it may be concluded that SGA can be used as a nutrition screening tool, and comprehensive nutrition assessment is desirable for those malnourished.

• Journal of Nutrition and Health
• /
• 제43권2호
• /
• pp.189-196
• /
• 2010

입원환자의 초기 영양관리를 위해 개발한 영양검색 도구의 타당성을 평가 하고자 입원 후 48시간 이내에 동일한 대상자에게 KNNRS, PG-SGA, NRS-2002를 수행하였으며 그 결과를 비교 평가하였다. 1) KNNRS, PG-SGA, NRS-2002를 이용한 영양검색결과 영양상태 불량 및 영양불량 위험도가 높은 환자의 비율은 각각 28.7%, 51.3%, 48.5%로 나타났다. 2) 각 영양검색 도구에 따라 영양상태 불량 및 영양불량 위험도가 높은 것으로 나타난 환자는 영양상태 양호 및 영양불량 위험도가 낮은 환자에 비해 공통적으로 평균연령이 높고 BMI, 혈중 헤모글로빈, 총 임파구수, 알부민 수치가 유의적으로 낮았다. 3) KNNRS와 PG-SGA에 의한 영양상태 분류를 비교하였을 때 KNNRS에서 영양상태가 양호한 환자 545명 중 PG-SGA에 의해 영양상태가 양호한 환자는 331명이었다. KNNRS에서 영양상태가 불량한 환자 219명 중 PG-SGA에서도 영양상태가 불량한 환자는 178명이었다. 민감도와 특이도는 각각 60.7% (95%CI 54.2-67.0), 81.2% (95% CI 75.3-85.2)로 영양불량 상태를 판정하는데 두 도구가 임상적 관련성이 있는 것으로 사료된다. 두 도구 간 유사성 kappa 지수는 0.34로 KNNRS는 PG-SGA를 기준으로 타당한 검색도구로 검증되었다. 4) KNNRS와 NRS-2002에 의한 영양상태 분류를 비교하였을 때 KNNRS에서 영양상태가 양호한 환자 540명 중 NRS-2002에 의해 영양불량 위험도가 낮은 환자는 312명 이었다. KNNRS에서 영양상태가 불량한 환자 216명 중 NRS-2002에서 영양불량 위험도가 높은 환자는 139명이었다. 민감도와 특이도는 각각 57.8% (95%CI 53.4-60.9), 64.4% (95%CI 60.2-69.8)로 영양불량 상태를 판정하는 데 두 도구가 임상적 관련성이 적은 것으로 사료된다. 두 도구 간 유사성은 kappa 지수 0.18로 낮게 나타났다. 5) KNNRS가 PG-SGA 결과와 비교 시 타당성이 검증되었으나 영양불량환자의 비율은 28.7%로 PG-SGA와 NRS-2002의 51.3%, 48.5%에 비해 낮았다. 보다 효과적이고 적극적인 초기 영양관리 중재를 위하여 영양불량 판정 기준의 수정 보완이 필요하다. 6) 영양검색 도구의 유효성과 영양관리의 효과를 검증하기 위하여 재원일수, 합병증 여부, 질병 예후, 사망여부와의 연계연구가 필요하다.

• 생물정신의학
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.277-287
• /
• 1996

본 연구는 주정중독에 동반된 우울증 환자의 치료에서 적어도 행동학적 부작용의 관점에서는 PAR이 AMI보다 우수함을 증명하였다. 이러한 PAR의 행동학적 효과의 우수성은 환자의 삶의 질을 향상시키고 결국 치료결과를 높이는데 관여하리라고 생각된다.

• Journal of Nutrition and Health
• /
• 제52권4호
• /
• pp.332-341
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 입원환자의 초기영양평가를 위해 개발된 영양검색도구의 타당성을 평가하고자 입원 후 24시간이내 동일한대상자에게 PG-SGA와 개별면담을 시행 후 그 결과를 비교 평가하였다. CKUNRS와 PG-SGAS 두 그룹 모두 나이는 고위험군이 평균 연령보다 높았고, BMI, 혈청 알부민과 헤모글로빈은 영양불량이 심할수록 유의적으로 낮게 나타났다. CKUNRS와 PG-SGA를 비교 분석한 영양 평가결과 전체 686명 중 영양불량 위험 환자는 각각 107명(15.6%)과 380명 (44.6%)으로 조사되었다. 민감도와 특이도는 각각 98.7% (96.8 ~ 99.5)와 33.3% (28.1 ~ 39.0)로 나타났으며, 두 도구 간 유사성 kappa 지수는 0.34로 CKUNRS는 PG-SGA를 기준으로 어느 정도 타당한 검색도구로 검증되었다. 결론적으로, CKUNRS를 PG-SGA와 같은 공인된 영양검색도구와 비교한 결과 민감도와 유사성 면에서는 어느 정도 타당한 수준의 영양검색도구인 것으로 판정되었으나, 특이도가 높지 않은 부분에 대해서는 추가적인 고려가 필요할 것으로 보인다. 초기입원 영양평가로 효과적인 영양검색도구를 위하여 재원기간, 합병증 유무, 사망률, 환자의 질병 예후와 관련된 유용성은 검증되지 않아 이에 관련하여 추가적 연구가 필요하다고 사료된다. 그리고 보다 정확한 영양불량 환자의 검색을 위해서는 간호사의 입원환자 초기 평가 및 재평가 부분에서 누락 가능성이 있는 체중변화, 소화기계장애, 식욕상태, 저작곤란, 연하곤란 등의 정확한 기록을 할 수 있도록 간호사정 기록자의 지속적인 교육이 필요할 것으로 보이며, 효과적인 초기 영양관리를 위해서는 향후 CKUNRS의 영양검색 기준에 대한 수정보완이 필요하다고 사료된다.

• 마케팅과학연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.49-58
• /
• 2010

企业社会责任已经成为学者们进行研究的一个重要课题. 多数认为企业社会责任对企业去定义他们在社会中的责任是必要的, 并且为他们的商业活动提供社会和道德标准. 其结果是, 相当数量的零售商已经采用企业社会责任为一个战略工具来宣传他们的商业活动. 为此, 本研究企图探索美国消费者在他们对零售商主观的感知和评估的基础上在道德购买和消费中的态度和行为. 本文的目的包括: 1)测定参与者对零售商企业社会责任的认知度. 2)评定参与者如何评估零售商企业社会责任. 3)测定参与者对零售商企业社会责任的评估过程是否影响他们对零售商的态度. 4)评定参与者对零售商企业社会责任的态度是否影响他们的购买行为. 本文并没有关注实际的零售商企业社会责任表现. 因为消费者的决定过程是基于个体的评定而不是实际的事实. 本研究调查了美国大学生对零售商企业社会责任的认知和评估. 本研究的参与者是56名来自美国东南大学的大学生. 他们的年龄在18岁到26岁之间. 使用开放性译码和选择性译码进行内容分析. 我们收集和分析了超过100张单倍行距的答复. 使用两步骤的译码(即开放性译码和选择性译码. 译码结果和分析笔记用来理解参与者对企业社会责任的认知和从书写的回复中提炼出来包括直接引用的答案所支持的伦理购买行为. 为保护参与者隐私, 这里使用的都是化名. 参与者被要求写下有关零售商, 他们对企业社会责任问题的认识和评估一个零售商的企业社会责任表现. 大部分应答者(n=28)表明他们对企业社会责任有一定的认识但是不觉得需要按这个要求去做. 少数应答者(n=8)表明他们对企业社会责任有一定的认识但是基本不关心. 结果表明当大学生评估零售商的几页社会责任表现时, 他们使用企业社会责任的三个纬度: 员工支持, 社区支持和环境支持. 我们发现如何对待和支持员工是一个评估零售商的企业社会责任的重要准则. 应答者表明作为一个员工和零售商有好的经历会使他们对此零售商有积极的感知和态度. 和员工支持相关的有四个主题: 根据员工表现的奖励和惩罚, 工作环境, 员工教育和训练课程, 以及员工和员工家人折扣. 良好的赏罚机制被认为是一个重要的属性. 和工作环境相关的因素包括: 零售商如何良好的遵守与工作时间相关的规则, 午餐时间和休息同样被认为是重要的属性之一. 有关社区支持, 有三个方面: 对当地社区销售比率的贡献, 对慈善组织的财政贡献和对社区大型活动的支持. 在环境方面, 有两个主题: 循环利用和销售有机或绿色产品. 在回复中有提到, 零售商正在尝试去做对环境友好所能做的. 一位应答者提到这个公司正在创造有环保设计的店铺. 并且能在这家公司的网站上轻松的找到为帮助环境所做的事情的信息. 应答者还注意到这些店铺可提供有机和亲环境产品. 应答者在此类中还提到关于这个公司如何使用环保的杯子和他们如何帮助新奥尔良的居民重建家园. 应答者注意到零售商为购买产品的消费者提供可再使用的袋子. 一位应答者说一家零售商通过提供有机棉来使他们的产品帮助环境. 在分析应答者之后, 我们发现参与者对零售商的企业社会责任的评估影响他们对零售商的态度. 然而, 在态度和购买行为之间有显著的差异. 尽管参与者对零售商的企业社会责任有积极的态度, 但资金和时间的缺乏也影响他们的购买行为. 总体来看, 一半的应答者(n=28)提到在购物时企业社会责任表现影响他们的购买决定. 本研究的结果为零售商针对消费者提高他们的形象而考虑企业社会责任提供了支持. 本研究暗示出消费者根据员工, 社区和环境三方面的支持来评估零售商. 评估, 态度和购买行为似乎是密切相关的. 也就是说, 评估是基于消费者对零售商企业社会责任的认识. 这些认识可以影响他们对零售商的态度从而进一步影响他们的购买行为. 参与者同时表明企业社会责任会使他们对零售商印象良好但是并不会影响他们的购买行为. 在参与者中, 价格和便利似乎超越了企业社会责任的重要性. 本文还讨论了此研究的启示, 对未来研究的建议和研究的局限.