• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.19-26
• /
• 2024

This study examines a systematic and effective approach to career guidance in medical education, with a particular focus on the 6-year integrated career guidance education framework implemented at the College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea. Based on the "New SLICE" educational development principles, this framework comprehensively addresses the needs of medical students in career planning and development. It is structured into three phases: understanding yourself, exploring options, and choosing a specialty. The first phase, understanding yourself, helps students to recognize their strengths, weaknesses, aptitudes, and potentials, thereby setting the direction for future career choices. This phase includes various psychological tests and Self-Development and Portfolio courses. The second phase, exploring options, enables students to engage in related activities such as research and practical training, providing direct and indirect experiences across various fields. This phase offers courses including Medical Field Experience, Career Guidance through the Learning Community & Advisory Professors, and Student Participation in Professor Research Projects. The final phase, choosing a specialty, involves students making decisions based on in-depth self-assessment and exploration of majors, with a capstone project being a significant component. Maximizing the efficiency of career decision-making requires integration between the basic medical curriculum and postgraduate education. Including the period up to residency entrance in the framework is necessary for effective career guidance education.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.190-203
• /
• 2002

이 연구의 목적은 포트폴리오 평가의 내용 타당도를 검증하고 학생 포트폴리오에서 파악할 수 있는 정보의 유형을 조사하는 것이다. 내용 타당도를 각 차시의 목적과 교육과정의 중점에 비추어 검증하였으며, 학생 포트폴리오를 분석하여 어떤 정보를 파악할 수 있는지 분석하였다. 분석에 사용한 학생 포트폴리오는 경기도 평택시 A 초등학교 4학년 한 학급에서 실시한 것이다. 포트폴리오에는 4학년 2학기 지층과 화석, 열과 물체의 변화단원 내용이 포함되어 있다. 4학년 교과서, 실험관찰, 교사용 지도서 역시 분석되었으며, 그 결과는 학생 포트폴리오에서 파악한 정보와 비교하였다. 과학교육전문가 2인과 10명의 현직 초등 교사가 분석에 참여하였다. 연구 결과 포트폴리오 평가 양식과 교육과정 및 교과서 내용은 $70\sim100%$ 범위의 일치도를 보였다 교육과정 중점과 비교할 때는 90% 이상의 일치도를 나타냈다. 학생 포트폴리오는 이해, 관찰, 의욕, 학습의 과정에 대한 정보를 많이 포함하고 있었으며, 결론도출, 의사소통, 자기 주도, 학습의 진전, 자기 개념, 상호작용, 학습의 과정에 대한 정보도 상당히 포함하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 전체적으로 볼 때 학생 포트폴리오와 교과서의 정보는 거의 비슷한 수준을 보였다. 다만 예상, 의욕, 자기 주도, 상호 작용과 같은 정보는 학생 포트폴리오에 더 많이 포함되어 있었으며, 관찰이나 실험 계획에 대한 정보는 과학교과서에서 상대적으로 더 많이 포함하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 연구 대상 포트폴리오 평가 양식은 타당도가 높으며, 지필 검사로는 얻을 수 없는 다양하고 풍부한 정보를 포함하고 있었다. 학생 포트폴리오에서 얻은 정보를 잘 활용하면 학생들의 학습과 장점에 대한 깊은 이해를 할 수 있고, 이를 바탕으로 학생들의 과학 학습을 크게 향상시킬 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.163-175
• /
• 2004

In this study, 63 university seniors majoring Child Studies were in an 8-week Web Based Instruction (WBI) program. Student characteristics of learning motivation, self-regulatory learning strategy, and learning style (Kolb, 1985) were the independent variables. Learning effects as dependent variables were measured by paper test and work assessment. Spearman's $\rho$ was calculated and tests of rank order difference were used for the data analysis. Results showed that learning motivation and self-regulatory learning strategy had meaningful positive relations with learning effects on the paper test score. Learning effects showed differences by learning style. These findings indicated that the learner's characteristics should be considered in the design and development of more effective WBI environments.

• 대한화학회지
• /
• 제62권3호
• /
• pp.203-213
• /
• 2018

이 연구는 논의기반 탐구 과학수업에서 학생 평가활동이 고등학생들의 주장과 증거 형성에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 인문계 고등학교 1학년 166명을 대상으로 논의기반 탐구 과학수업을 실시하였으며, 실험집단 학생(84명)들은 모둠의 주장과 증거에 대한 평가 기회를 제공받았고 비교집단 학생(82명)들은 이 단계를 생략하였다. 학생 평가활동이 학생들의 주장과 증거 형성에 미치는 영향 알아보기 위해 학생들이 작성한 주장과 증거 그리고 학생 평가활동의 결과를 분석하였으며, 인터뷰와 설문조사를 통해 학생 평가활동의 타당성과 활용정도를 알아보았다. 연구 결과, 논의활동에서 증거를 형성하는 능력이 비교집단보다 실험집단이 통계적으로 유의미하게 높게 나타났으며, 실험집단 학생들이 비교집단 학생들보다 더 정확하고 충분한 증거를 제시하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 실험집단 학생들은 평가활동을 통해 주장에 대한 증거가 적절한지, 증거가 충분한지, 제시된 증거 자료는 정확한지 대해 평가하며 지속적으로 평가결과를 피드백으로 활용하였음을 알 수 있었다. 학생들은 평가 결과가 대체적으로 타당하다고 인식하고 있으며, 평가 결과를 다음 활동에 반영하여 다양한 증거를 제시하는 능력이 향상되었다고 인식하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 이를 통해 논의기반 탐구 과학수업에서 학생 평가활동이 학생들의 주장과 증거를 형성할 때 주장의 타당성과 정당성을 높이는 증거 형성에 효과적이라는 것을 알 수 있다.

• 대한물리의학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.97-107
• /
• 2018

PURPOSE: This study investigated the job-centered curriculum in the Department of Physiotherapy at the University of Brighton, England, to examine NCS (national competency standards) curriculum in physiotherapy. METHODS: The researcher visited the University of Brighton from September 2015 to May 2016 and conducted interviews with faculty members. Data were collected through the university's website and the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. RESULTS: The undergraduate program is a three-year program and with a module system. There is a course leader for each module. Each grade requires 120 credits (10 hours per credit) and credit hours can be earned through lectures, tutorials, practical sessions, self-directed e-learning, group work, inter-professional classes, and seminars. Clinical placement is carried out six times during 3 years, for a total of 32 weeks, 35 hours per week, 1120 hours in total. Students are enrolled as a student members of the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy and are covered by professional liability insurance during clinical placement. The Center for Teaching and Learning holds regular workshops to discuss curriculum and module design, conduct course reviews, and review student assessment and feedback. All courses at the university must be approved, monitored annually, and re-approved every 5 years. CONCLUSION: This study can contribute to the development and operation of the NCS physiotherapy curriculum, as well as to the development of modules and assessment tools related to the application of this curriculum.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제57권2호
• /
• pp.75-92
• /
• 2018

Based on Perceptions about Mathematics Teachers (PMT) perceived by high school students, measured by 2189 students from Seoul Educational Longitudinal Study 2014 (SELS 2014), latent profile analysis (LPA) identified five distinct types of student groups (positive, partial positive, middle, negative, extreme negative). These student of positive, middle, and negative groups are positive, moderate and negative perceptions about math teachers. Partial positive group generally had a positive perception about mathematics teachers, extremely negative group was very negative about mathematics teachers. Both of these groups had peculiarly inconsistent trends and several anomalies. The Multinomial logistic regression analyses also indicated that individual factors (gender, major, self-concept, resilience, self-assessment, career maturity), school factors (friendship, relationship with school teachers) and parental factors (academic-relationship, emotional-relationship) were significant predictors of PMT profile groups. The Analysis of variance also indicated that mathematics class (attitude, satisfaction and atmosphere), Mathematics achievement were significant predictors of PMT profile groups. The profiling of perceptions about mathematics teachers resulted in enhanced understanding of the complex range of processes students employed. During mathematics class, implementation of smooth interactions and communications between students and teachers added in the teaching and learning of mathematics.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.20-31
• /
• 2018

Good assessment is crucial for feedback on curriculum and to motivate students to learn. This study was conducted to perform item analysis on the Medical Education Assessment Consortium clinical knowledge mock examination (MEAC CKME) (2011-2016) and to evaluate several effects to improve item quality using both classical test theory and item response theory. The estimated difficulty index (P) and discrimination index (D) were calculated according to each course, item type, A (single best answer)/R (extended matching) type, and grading of item quality. The cut-off values used to evaluate P were: >0.8 (easy); 0.6-0.8 (moderate); and <0.6 (difficult). The cut-off value for D was 0.3. The proportion of appropriate items was defined as those with P between 0.25-0.75 and D ${\geq}0.25$. Cronbach ${\alpha}$ was used to assess the reliability and was compared with those of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination (KMLE). The results showed the recent mean difficulty and decimation index was 0.62 and 0.20 for the first MEAC CKME and 0.71 and 0.19 for the second MEAC CKME, respectively. Higher grade items evaluated by a self-checklist system had better D values than lower grade items and higher grade items gradually increased. The preview and editing process by experts revealed maintained P, decreased recall items, increased appropriate items with better D values, and higher reliability. In conclusion, the MEAC CKME (2011-2016) is deemed appropriate as an assessment to evaluate students' competence and prepare year four medical students for the KMLE. In addition, the self-checklist system for writing good items was useful in improving item quality.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.253-263
• /
• 2001

Developing mathematical thinking skills is one of the most important goals of school mathematics. In particular, recent performance based on assessment has focused on the teaching and learning environment in school, emphasizing student's self construction of their learning and its process. Because of this reason, people related to mathematics education including math teachers are taught to recognize the fact that the degree of students'acquisition of mathematical thinking skills and strategies(for example, inductive and deductive thinking, critical thinking, creative thinking) should be estimated formally in math class. However, due to the lack of an evaluation tool for estimating the degree of their thinking skills, efforts at evaluating student's degree of mathematics thinking skills and strategy acquisition failed. Therefore, in this paper, mathematical thinking was studied, and using the results of study as the fundamental basis, mathematical thinking process model was developed according to three types of mathematical thinking - fundamental thinking skill, developing thinking skill, and advanced thinking strategies. Finally, based on the model, evaluation factors related to essential thinking skills such as analogy, deductive thinking, generalization, creative thinking requested in the situation of solving mathematical problems were developed.

• 대한통합의학회지
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.63-73
• /
• 2018

Purpose : This study aims to verify the effects of flipped learning on self-directed learning and class satisfaction in a class of college physical therapy students. Methods : The subjects were 97 students in College A who had registered for musculoskeletal examination and assessment and practice at the second semester of 2017. All subjects were measured with the self-directed learning questionnaire for college student proposed by Lee et al., and the class satisfaction questionnaire proposed by Lee et al., before and after intervention. The collected data were processed using a computerized statistical program SPSS Win version 21.0. Mean, standard deviation, paired t-test and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were calculated. Results : The results showed significant differences in goal setting, identify resources for learning, effort attributed to results, self-reflection of self-directed learning and problem solving excellence, class methods and contents attention and understanding(p<.05), class interest of class satisfaction(p<.05). Conclusion : These results suggest that flipped learning improves learning motivation and attitudes. Therefore, follow-up study is necessary to investigate further the application of flipped learning in various students and teaching methods.

• 운동영양학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.69-74
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a winter training camp on physical fitness, physical self-efficacy and nutrients intake in juvenile Taekwondo players. Sixty three subjects of male middle school student Taekwondo players participated in this study. Before and after attending Taekwondo winter training camp, Taekwondo related fitness and physical self efficacy and nutrients intake of subjects were measured and compared. The results of this study were as follows: 1) There were significantly improvements (p<0.001) in 1200m run, sit up, push up. 2) There was no significantly change in physical self efficacy. 3) There were significantly increase intakes (p<0.001) in total calorie, protein, fat, fiber, Ca, P, K, vitamin A, vitamin B2, vitamin B6, niacin, vitamin C and vitamin E. However, index of nutritional quality in fiber, Ca, K, vitamin A had not good assessment. These results suggested that a winter training seems necessary to keep psychological management and scientific dietary management as well as physical training in juvenile Taekwondo players.